Rick, I am terribly sorry about your wife’s ordeal. There was no need for her to endure this. This is purely unethical for it shows continual, poor service for all travelers. Like other professions, there are always ‘bad apples’ working for TSA unfortunately. Still, those TSA agents needed to be reprimanded and reminded about being courteous to everyone at all times. There was no excuse for the TSA agents to treat someone badly. I totally understand your unfortunate situation. I want to give Dr. Oster the round of applause because I had that same experience every time I went through TSA scanners whenever I flew out to different states for ballroom dancing competitions. I always hollered, “Hey, mister (or ma’am), please be informed that I wear a hearing aid and it may accidentally set that alarm off.” These TSA agents really did look nervous every time. As always, they got me through in a split second. LOL! Of course, last time, I flew was like three years ago since I am too busy doing the writing assignments for the doctoral program. …show more content…
One of these agents once told me that they had to do their job but they were also proud of the work since they believed they helped to keep our flights safely. Even though, we all hate to go through TSA scanners for they are time-consuming and so annoying. I certainly won’t convince anyone who despises those TSA scanners. Luke 6:31 says, “Do to others as you would like them to do to you.” Eventually, those TSA agents should get compliments from us for keeping flights safely. I often wonder if there is a better way to go through these obnoxious
POSITION PAPER ON THE AIR FORCE DISBANDING INTO A SEPARATE AIR FORCE AND SPACE FORCE 1. What is the difference between a. and a. This Position Paper is on the idea that the Air Force should disband into a separate Air Force and Space Force. This paper will go over three things: the pros and cons of doing this, and it will back up the notion that it is a good idea after all to disband into separate entities. 2.
Being a food service accountant is a rewarding job that comes with a lot of responsibility. It’s a job that requires one person to be the financial watchdog over the whole food service operation at any particular Air Force base. The food service accountant has to review all financial records, such as purchase order documents, inventory sheets, and waste logs; and then prepare reports to send up to the Services Agency to report on the facility’s financial status. One person can be the accountant for multiple facilities and the entire Air Force is counting on this individual to catch any major signs of wasteful spending from the facilities that the accountant is responsible for overseeing. Individuals lucky enough to get selected for this position are usually handpicked and have a proven record of responsibility and great attention to detail. Being a food service accountant is a privilege with rewarding benefits that most of the people assigned to the same duty section do not get the opportunity to enjoy.
The National Security Agency or NSA for short is a United States federal government intelligence organization that is used for global monitoring and collecting data. After the attacks on September 11, 2001, President George W. Bush implemented the NSA’s domestic spying program to conduct a range of surveillance activities inside the United States. There has been a lot of controversy surrounding this program as it allows the NSA to tap into the public’s phone calls, cameras, internet searches, text messages, and many other mediums to seek out individuals that may be potential threats to the security of the general public. Many individuals say that the tactics used by the NSA are unconstitutional as they invade people’s privacy. This is primarily
One of the first new pieces of technology the TSA introduced were better screeners. A new screener known as AIT or Advance imaging technology has been created to counteract items that may have been hidden from site or...
Flight attendants aboard the plane warned federal agents that the Indian-Americans looked suspicious; therefore, the agents took Hebshi into custody to be searched and questioned. The flight attendants and the federal agents were just trying to make sure that everyone on board the flight was safe. Despite the motives, in any circumstance, racial profiling is wrong. The problem with racial profiling in this case is the woman and the two men made it past extensive airport security; therefore, if they were exhibiting any suspicious behavior it would have already been dealt with by security professionals. The problem with racial profiling in every case is that it violates the natural rights of the person that is being victimized.
Since 9/11 there have been nine major security changes at airports. The most important changes are the liquid ban, which bans liquids more than 3.4 ounces from being on an airplane and the body-scan machines along with the enhanced pat downs. (Seaney 1)l/ The body scan machines are x-ray machines that scan the person for anything that could be used as a weapon. Enhanced pat downs are violating to some people as they do not like their private areas searched for weapons. But these pat downs are necessary to detect, find, and remove weapons that a TSA (Transportation Security Administration) agent cannot see with their own eyes. The last important change worth mentioning is that all special items including laptops, tablets, E-readers, and all electronic items have to be checked for explosives and other threats. These changes as well as other minor regulations for passengers give the TSA an extra line of defense while screening air travelers.
“What time should we leave? Two hours in advance? Three? Four?” Millions of people ask these questions each year before boarding a plane. Between driving, security, walking to the gate, and getting settled, boarding a plane exhausts travelers. But out of all of these different activities, one frustrates and restrains travelers the most: TSA security. People ask why they need all this security, complain about the inconvenience it causes, and ultimately annoys people to no end. Created after 9/11, Transportation Security Administration, or TSA, nationalized airport security, increased screening duration, and supposedly increases security on flights. However, statistics say these added security measures never come to fruition and potentially cost more lives than they save.
To avoid it, you need to be careful to handle TSA. Do not open the lid, touching it on the surface, and passing down. You need to make sure to follow the steps and keep the area clean and
The gate agent’s job appears to be a balancing act between the safety of each passenger and the inconvenience of the process they must undergo to ensure that safety. Agent Ludo Sanchez was part of the first wave of those hired after the Trade Center event. He applied for the TSA position out of a sense of patriotism as soon as he became aware that there was a need. Also, in Sanchez’s defense, on the day of the incident, as soon as he was notified that his area had been breeched, he immediately began “the standard procedures for securing the area, and sealing the terminal from further passenger traffic” (p. 6).
The importance of the TSA in security can be seen on a daily basis, even though this security comes at a price. Majority of the time the lines move smoothly and delays are caused by passengers who rush and fail to follow the rules. This week alone 37 Firearms were discovered, of the 37 firearms, 34 were loaded and 15 had rounds chambered. (Transportation Security Administration, 2014) These are dangers items that we don’t know the intent of the passengers. If you look back at the events of 9/11 lesser weapons (box cutters) were used by the hijackers to take over the plan, fear is a powerful tool. The TSA has used multiple detection systems which assist with detection of these items which include but not limited to body scanners, chemical scanners (which detection gun power ingredients), metal detectors ...
As a response to the 9/11 attacks, one would expect that the TSA would improve airport security. In reality, it's just security theater. Originally, the use of metal detectors and luggage x-rays in airport security checkpoints was enough. However, on December 25, 2009, an inbound international flight was the target of an attempted bomb plot. Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab got past security screening and successfully boarded the plane with explosives packed in his underwear. He nearly succeeded in detonating the bomb, but the detonation didn't go as planned and passengers overpowered him before he could fix the detonation[0]. As a result, the TSA increased the use of full-body scanners to replace metal detectors. Before the 2009 attack, there were only 40 full-body scanners in use across 19 airports. After the attack, the government planned to have over 1000 machines in use by the end of 2011. However, the expensive machines are ineffective. In 2010, TV personality Adam Savage unintentionally managed to get two 12" long razor blades through security[1]. In 2011, an undercover TSA agent was able to successfully pass through the scanners with a handgun in her underwear, repeatedly[2]. The TSA is clearly incapable of creating a truly safe airport checkpoint, and is becoming less effective the longe...
This type of screening was performed by a private organizations, who were hired by the airline that held the operation control over certain airline terminals based on a type of complicated competitive bidding process (“Introduction to US Airport Security”).
Well, we can start off by saying TSA isn’t going anywhere anytime soon as much as we’d love for it to be long gone. One of the biggest solutions to not only help lines move faster, but cut down the billions of dollars that TSA spends on security, is to profile people. As inadequate as it sounds, we are profiled every single day. To what we’re wearing, our hairstyle, our language, our ethnicity, etc, someone is always going to judge you based on first appearance. Police officers are the biggest profilers in the world. Christopher Elliott concedes that there’s been a lot of talk lately about the TSA adopting Israeli-style screening techniques, including profiling every airline passenger. This makes sense. Terrorists who bomb airlines tend to fit a certain description (Elliott). Profiling can be done in two different ways. Philip Baum of the NY Times, acknowledges that effective profiling is based on the analysis of the behavior and appearance of a passenger (Baum). Profiling isn’t always based on race, religion, nationality, or color of the
Does the thought of going through airport security make you want to jump off a bridge? Some people may think that security in airports is either too strict, or it is not enforced enough. Airport security has certainly developed over time, both in terms of more technology, and in terms of increased security. It has had a lot of reasons to step up, both with terrorist attacks, and with other incidents, such as the way that explosive technology has evolved. The topic of airport security is a big debate: is it too strict or not strict enough? It is important that people know and understand both sides of this important issue.
Airlines are institutions that have their own unique set of rules outside of “normal society.” These rules and norms of airport and airplane behavior are socially constructed as behaviors that are often seen as acceptable outside of these specific institutions may be frowned upon or illegal within the confines of air travel. This social construction is a product of social interaction, between the many employees and consumers at the airport, with the airport having the goal to transport their customers from one place to another as quickly and safely as possible. This goal requires that the airport effectively does its job and that the passengers play their own part in following the rules set forth. People are expected to act in accordance to the airport norms, or else will be potentially faced with punishment. An example of this could be saying the word bomb. In everyday life this is not a big deal, however...