Prison Misconduct

1303 Words3 Pages

Prison Misconduct There are two different kinds of influences on prison misconduct, there is the combined characteristics of the inmates themselves, and the combined characteristics of the staff in control of them (Camp, Gaes, Langan, Saylor (2003). Prison misconduct has been classified into significant fields related to drug use, violence, property offenses, prison accountability and escapes, security-related offenses, security offenses interfering with daily operations, along with a residual category (Camp, Gaes, Langan, Saylor (2003). Misconduct spoils the effective procedure of the correctional institution, detracting from its capability to present the intentional services to the superior society (Goetting & Howsen (1986). Sexual Misconduct Seven significant properties were found from the Poisson Regression Model (Delisi, Caudill, Trulson, Marquart, Vaughn, Beaver (2010) study for sexual misconduct. First, wards with heightened anger-irritability symptoms were to be expected to take part in sexual misconduct. Younger wards with Caucasian delinquents were way more drawn in to sexual misconduct. Wards with elevated scores on somatic symptoms were less prone to be taking part in sexual misconduct. All previous offenses strongly predicted sexual misconduct but previous property and earlier drug use were negatively connected to sexual misconduct. In a study using 14 controls, psychiatric symptoms, commitment offense type, gender, race, age, and four different measures of previous delinquency; anger extensively predicted staff assaults, sexual misconduct, and aggressive misconduct. It also advanced significance in foreseeing ward assaults (Delisi, Caudill, Trulson, Marquart, Vaughn, Beaver (2010). In a women’s penitentiary the mo... ... middle of paper ... ...rulson, Marquart, Vaughn, Bever (2010). Additional research has revealed that individual-level risk factors, like gang history, recurrent prison confinements, active criminal justice status, previous arrests and convictions, substance abuse history, and others are associated with prison misconduct and violence among inmates (DeLisis, Caudill, Trulson, Marquart, Vaughn, Bever (2010). In other research inmates’ psychological characteristic were studied such as anger in relation to their criminal history, these variables also relate to misconduct in prison. There is a harsh distinction concerning those at the top of the dominance pyramid in which the toughest men take over individuals who are less than them. At the top of the pyramid there are those that are considered “real men,” while those considered to be “weaklings” or “punks” inhabit the bottom of the pyramid.

Open Document