In the article, “Princess Diana Dies in Paris Crash,” the British Broadcasting Company or BBC remains the ethos example because they provide trusted World and UK news. Ethos demonstrates that speakers and writers are credible and trustworthy. The logos example shown in the article consists of, “Diana, Princess of Wales, has died in a car crash in Paris,” which remains a fact straight from the text. Using logos correctly means that the writer or speaker has a clear main idea, with specific details, examples, facts, stats, or expert testimony. This article does not consistently show pathos because it comes from a news broadcast and not many emotions remained shown throughout the article. The only pathos in this article explains how the Queen …show more content…
and the Prince of Wales remained, “deeply shocked and distressed” when Prince Charles broke the news of their mother’s death to Princes William and Harry. Pathos remains shown by using emotion, and it also helps draw in an audience for the writer or speaker. The information from this article remains very reliable and trustworthy coming from BBC News. This article stayed on topic from start to finish, which shows that the article clearly hit the rhetoric mark. The British Broadcasting Company had facts that came from a direct source, and they also stayed on topic very well. In the article, “Queen Elizabeth’s Televised Speech,” the ethos consists of Queen Elizabeth, Princess Diana’s mother in law.
Some examples of logos that remained shown in the article remained Diana’s death and also when Queen Elizabeth stated, “Since last Sunday’s dreadful news we have seen, throughout Britain and around the world, and overwhelming expression of sadness at Diana’s death.” By reading the article, it remained very clear that Princess Diana got involved with multiple charities. The pathos shown in this article consisted of how one decides to deal with a loss. Another example of pathos shown remains when Queen Elizabeth stated: “In good times and bad, she never lost her capacity to smile and laugh, nor to inspire others with her warmth and kindness,” while she spoke of Princess Diana. The article showed in many ways why people admired and respected her so much. Queen Elizabeth did a televised speech, and in the speech, she stated that the family had to mourn the death of their daughter. This article came from Queen Elizabeth herself, which makes it a very reliable and trustworthy source. This article clearly hit the rhetoric mark by staying on topic throughout the entire …show more content…
article. In the article, “Earl Spencer’s Eulogy for Diana,” Earl Spencer, Diana’s brother, remains the ethos example.
Earl Spencer remained a very reliable and credible source because he knew Diana very well. Some examples of logos shown in this article remained that Diana had eating disorders, and that the last time that Earl had seen Diana was for her birthday on July 1st in London. To explain the pathos, Earl Spencer tells about the sadness of Diana’s death and says how wonderful of a person she acted as, “People who never actually met her, feel that they too, lost someone close to them.” Anyone who has ever read this eulogy could feel the great amount of emotion that the brother had expressed for Diana. This article missed the mark because the author gets off of subject and talks more about the feelings of him and the people rather than about
Diana. In the article, “Wikipedia entry for Princess Diana,” the ethos remained Wikipedia because it remains an online encyclopedia. An example of logos shown in this article remained, “On 31 August 1997 Diana was involved in a car accident in the Pont de L’Alma road tunnel in Paris, along with her new lover Dodi Al-Fayed, and their driver Henry Paul.” Other examples of logos remained that they had driven a Mercedes and crashed into the thirteenth pillar of the tunnel, and that Diana’s funeral date happened on 6 September 1997. This article missed the rhetoric mark because Wikipedia did not act as a reliable source. Wikipedia remains an online encyclopedia that gets created and edited by volunteers from around the world; therefore, Wikipedia does not remain a credible and trustworthy source.
Edlund, John R. Ethos, Logos, Pathos: Three Ways to Persuade.” Cal Poly Pomona, n.d. Web. 6
...devices all work together in one way or another as well. It could also be, the author uses one rhetorical device to prove another one. For example, one way they work together is, when showing a picture of the nasty water in the article, it is pathos because seeing the picture will make readers feel disgust and sadness. Pictures are considered logos, which is why having it also intertwines logos in the mix. Ethos are pulled in the picture because it is relying on the evidence. The picture is evidence that this is not just some pitty article, it 's truly happening. It is a great article for the fact it lets a reader find their own opinion without forcing the opinion on them. This article not only informs the readers about what is going on but encourages them to donate water to Flint to make the slightest difference to the donator, but a huge difference to the receiver.
Pathos: is an approach that appeals to the audience’s emotions. Including specific examples showing how tragedies have been avoided thanks to first responders being trained. Also, included in Pathos are examples on how tragedies have happen due to the misunderstanding
An example of Moss’s outstanding usage of ethos, pathos, and logos is Jeffrey Dunn’s story. Dunn held an executive position at Coca-Cola in 2001, when the main company goal was to drive Coca-Cola into poorer areas. On a business trip to Brazil, Dunn realized that “these people need a lot of things, but they don’t need a Coke” and decided to push the company in a healthier direction. This choice led to Dunn’s eventual firing (491-494). This story not only appeals to pathos by getting to readers’ emotions, but also to ethos and logos because Dunn is a credible source and gives an authentic experience that adds to the credible feel of the article. (very good info./analysis, keep but
Aristotle’s rhetorical triangle links three elements of arguing together: the speaker, the story, and the audience. The relationship between the elements determines the speaker’s argument and whether it will be successful in oratory or literature. Ethos, Logos and Pathos are each different aspects of the argument that must be balanced in order to succeed in persuading or convincing an audience. Ethos, or character, relates to the speaker’s credibility that the audience appeals to: it is useful when persuading a group of people to trust what you are saying or doing. Logos, or logic, is a way of convincing and appealing by reason, truth, and facts. Pathos relates to the audience’s emotions and their response to what the speaker is saying.
The author uses pathos and logos several times in this writing. Pathos is in use when the author says, “Attempts to add sexual orientation to the federal statute began shortly after the brutal murder of young Matthew Sheppard in Wyoming, apparently because of his homosexuality.” He uses logos when he says, “ the yearly number of hate-crimes charges brought by the Justice Department dropped from seventy-six in 1996 to twenty-two ten years later.
Throughout the analyzing process, logos, ethos, and pathos are searched for and scrutinized. While reading this article, one may see believe there is a lack of evidence from outside sources to back up an argument, and then quite possibly assume it is just made up and not reliable. Granted, Jones seems to use only one source for his article, which does not necessarily mean he does not state any evidence or logos. This whole article is Jones’s evidence, and the source is himself, because the article is a story about the author’s involvement with violent media.
The fact in this article is that the writer uses logos and pathos more in the critique. Logos, meaning from the text book is the arrangement of an argument and also evidence that supports the writer’s statement. Pathos is Associated with emotional feelings. Ethos simply means the act of a writer trying to convince his audience. I believe that the writer did not use ethos much in the story.
Ethos and logos are used as an appeal in the essay. It was a story with a lot of emotion which she had successfully handled in the whole essay. She presented the essay in the real life with many facts, she gave poetic touch to her essay because of some of the metaphors she used like we didn 't breathe it. She used both logos and pathos in
She uses testimonial device to bring in the well-known reliable source known as Llewellyn Hinkes-Jones from “The Atlantic” to help support her case. She uses pathos to appeal to her audience’s emotions by pulling on their heartstrings. She uses the logos to provide support to her article which she means to convince her audience by use of logic, reason, or statistics. She uses euphemism to make something harsh or distasteful sound in a somewhat positive way. She uses ethos to convince her audience of her credibility. There are very few weaknesses in her article which are greatly outweighed by the many strengths in
She mentions how one’s ACE score directly affects their life. Information via pathos is not in statistics, but rather just words and how it is brought across the audience. Her word choice is strong throughout her talk, giving a question to the audience in the beginning of her talk asking, “How many of you know/knew someone has/had a mental illness when growing up.” This appeal to emotion grabs the audience’s attention as Harris attempts to relate her talk to everyone there. Harris’s logos are directly related to her pathos as her logos backs up her pathos. Without logos, Harris’s pathos would have been nothing as no supportive information would be
This causes her strongest statement to lose logos and ethos. Rust-Tierney and Schneck also bring heavy doses of pathos and logos as they question the same question William Baude poses: “Yet what if someone goes through every possible procedure and after all is said and done still claims to be innocent? What if another court were to actually find him innocent?” (Baude, 20). Employing pathos and logos Baude gives an explanation for why the death penalty is flawed as he tells the tale of a man on death row. Baude claims
Ramage, John D., and John C. Bean. "Ethos, Pathos, and Logos." Ethos, Pathos, and Logos. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 1998. Web. 29 Mar. 2014.
The emotional appeal (ethos) is wonderful, it connects audience and writer instantly, but there is a risk; some rational readers might suspect writer is an implicit bias because her article is laden with too much emotional content than standard research is.
Ethos, convincing people, is used through doctors, physiologists, and lawyers in the article. As you read the article some of the doctors seem to lose their standing with us because they could not detect what Dee Dee was doing to Gyspy, but ethos is used. Pathos deals with emotion and you get a lot of different emotions throughout the article. There is anger for what Dee Dee did to Gyspy, sadness for Dee Dee’s death, love which is what Rob, Gyspy’s father, has ever done to her, but there certainly more. Logos is logic, in the article, there is a use of it. Like when the article discusses the condition that Dee Dee had called, Malingering. The article is set up to invoke pathos, ethos, logos to help us understand the whole story and not just one part of