Primo Levi’s The Periodic Table

1135 Words3 Pages

Primo Levi’s The Periodic Table

Primo Levi’s personal relationship to his profession as a chemist shows that philosophically and psychologically, he is deeply invested in it. His book THe PeriOdic TaBLe shows that his methodology cannot be classified as either purely objective or purely subjective. He fits into the definition of dynamic objectivity given by Evelyn Fox Keller in her book Reflections on Gender and Science.

Primo Levi’s methodology cannot be called purely objective. Being purely objective would mean being not influenced by personal beliefs or feelings. Levi’s relationship to being a chemist is very much involved in how he feels. On page 33, Levi refers to zinc as “boring… tender and delicate” and says he felt “curious, shy, and vaguely annoyed…” (Levi 33). His feelings are very much involved. He always relates personally to everything he does with chemistry. The book itself shows how different parts of his life relate to the elements in the chapter titles. Each time he finds a way to relate his anecdotes or stories to a certain, elusive quality of the chapter title. Thus he cannot be said to be completely objective, because he is influenced by personal beliefs or feelings. In fact his feelings sometime dominate his scientific method.

Sometimes Levi completely ignores the facts and established methods and goes on his own feelings. On page 39 “I preferred to invent each time a new road, with swift, extemporaneous forays, as in a war of movement… here the relationship with Matter changed, became dialectical: it was fencing, a face-to-face match” (Levi 39). He finds new ways to relate to the matter, to investigate and explore it, to know it. This is his biggest interest and inspiration as a che...

... middle of paper ...

...as a chemist. His stories of chemistry always had a reference to the human condition. He was neither dominated by his feelings nor exclusively regulated to the facts. His methods were the personification of dynamic objectivity, the strange and unique mix of objectivity and subjectivity and then objectivity again. This made his story so unique and meaningful, for it was not a lecture in scientific principles and it was not a purely heartfelt history of his life. The parts that would be expected to be cold and heartless were oddly compassionate, and the parts that were expected to be soaked in emotion were strangely told from a factual point of view.

Bibliography

Keller, Evelyn Fox. Reflections on Gender and Science: 10th Anniversary Edition. New Haven and London: Yale University, 1995.

Levi, Primo. THe PeriOdic TaBLe. New York: Schocken Books, 1984.

More about Primo Levi’s The Periodic Table

Open Document