Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Brief essay on social psychology
Brief essay on social psychology
Brief essay on social psychology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Brief essay on social psychology
Previous research efforts have made attempts to show that priming certain cognitive personality traits can impact future behavior or responses. The present research paper will summarize the findings of some of the previous efforts, and will communicate the results of a similar priming exercise. Finally, the current results will be analyzed in order to attempt to support the assertion that priming may affect individual behavior, responses, and perceptions.
Triandis (1989) asserts that individuals possess three different aspects of the self: the private self, the public self, and the collective self. Furthermore, Triandis states that individuals will identify themselves in one of these three aspects depending on certain situational factors, such as culture, in-group/out-group status, anonymity, expectations of future interactions with others, etc.
Srull and Wyer (1979) found that causing individual participants to access certain trait characteristics by assigning them to perform cognitive tasks can affect how those individuals respond to stimuli in the future. For example, priming a participant with “hostility” or “kindness” can result in those participants’ positive or negative perceptions of an ambiguous personality that is later presented via a hypothetical vignette.
Kuhn and McPartland (1954) developed the “Twenty Statements” test. This test simply asked participants to answer the question “Who am I?” by writing twenty responses as if they were providing the answers to themselves. The responses to the questions could then be analyzed for content in order to determine whether the participants self-identified as collective (members of a group) or ideocentric (roles that were not reliant on relationships with others).
The...
... middle of paper ...
... to address some of the problems with this research study. It seems that the study may have benefited from the use of further controls. Specifically, the use of some method of capturing a baseline of self-perceptions by the participants may have provided even more illumination regarding whether the priming exercise resulted in an increase of collective or ideocentric responses.
Works Cited
Kuhn, M. H., & McPartland, T. S. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review, 19, 58-76.
Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660-1672.
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
Inside us all there is a deep dark fear this is what grabs us by the thresh hold of life. It controls the most important aspects of our lives. This is found within the deepest and darkest chasms of our souls. The very creature that wreaks havoc in our minds we cage and never confront we lock this beast away to afraid to overcome it. If the beast is not confronted it begins to contort and change who we are as a person and how we interact with others. Even the very decisions we make as a person to affect those around us and are loved ones to also suffer the consequences of our actions. Such as the crucible and how each person was warped into their own monster by greed.
Identity is very important in a person’s life. It can induce pride or shame, provide a community or provide a way to distinguish one’s self from others. But, where does this identity come from? It is easy to assume we are who we are because of who raised us, but this is not the entire case. Andrew Solomon, author of “Far from the Tree” introduced two different forms of identity, vertical and horizontal. He defines vertical identity as the attributes acquired and shared by the people we are raised by and horizontal identity as the attributes different from those who raised us, but are shared and acquired through a peer community. These two types of identities generally do not intersect and, depending on the circumstance, one can greatly impact
Does personality determine behavior? Phelps (2015) dived into this discussion in his article by reviewing the perspectives of personality, how psychology relates to behavior and the idea of self, and further, how behaviorists define personality and all of its components. Phelps (2015) compares and contrasts the common beliefs of personality and the view of self as attributed to personality theorists with those characterized by behavioral theorists. A typical understanding of personality is one that defines it as an internal substance that drives behavior, and therefore, by seeking to understand a person's personality we can almost assume their actions (Phelps, 2015). Behavioral theorists, on the other hand, do not lean on vague internal conditions to explain behavior, but rather they evaluate a person's past and present settings to define behavior, according to Phelps (2015). The conclusion is that behaviorists' perspectives on these topics are far more parsimonious in nature and most popular views of personality speak to a more internal and far-reaching position rather than the behavior itself (Phelps, 2015). Likewise, Phelps (2015) addresses the issue of meeting specific criteria for discerning whether a theoretical viewpoint is valid in helping us understand people. He continued to remark that behaviorists' stances meet a large portion of the criteria as presented by Gordon Allport (Phelps, 2015). For example, they have less assumptions, they are consistent, and not to mention, they are testable and falsifiable, Phelps (2015) supports. In my opinion and critical review, this article is useful because it provides an unbiased assessment of a variety of personality theories and definitions of personality and the self. Likewise, it is simple and easy to understand, thus qualifying it as parsimonious. Overall, I think the article did its ultimate job of evaluating different perspectives and
Human beings inherently utilise these cognitive structures in order to make immediate inferences about personality. In the 2000 study, Vrugt and Luyerink found that individuals had incorporated certain postural positions within their schematic structures for men and women, and could draw upon these to make inferences about personality and occupation. Females who posed conservatively were deemed more feminine, whilst male who sat less conservatively were deemed more masculine. Similarly, Hack (2014) ascertained that particular facial expressions had been cognitively assigned to either gender. Whereby, via the mechanism of stereotyping, the smiling females were perceived to be more likeable, communal beings, in comparison to the presented smiling male faces. Not dissimilarly, Lindwall and Ginis (2008) found that stereotypical traits existed for males who exercised regularly and those who did not. Based appearance alone, male exercisers were considered to be happy, sociable, hard working, confident and well disciplined. Furthermore, Juodvallkis et al (2003) explored the consequences of stereotyping behaviour in the job screening process. In relation to impression formation, those who displayed a gender appropriate style of communication were deemed to be more appropriate for the position than those who did not. Lastly, Okimoto (2012) extended this line of research and focused on the stereotyping
In Study 2, high-prejudice participants formed a more negative and less positive impression of the target person after subliminal priming of the category Blacks than did participants in the no-prime condition. Low-prejudice people tended in the opposite direction. (Lepore & Brown, 1997). In Study 3, both high- and low-prejudice people increased negative ratings when valenced stereotype content was also primed. (Lepore & Brown, 1997). The general aim of these three studies by Lepore & Brown, was to assess the possible flexibility among categorization, stereotyping and prejudice.
(1994). Beyond Individualism/Collectivism: New Cultural Dimensions of Values. In U.Kim, H.C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi & G. Yoon (Eds.). Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 112-115.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Journal of personality and social psychology and. Retrieved from http://internal.psychology.illinois.edu/~broberts/Hazan & Shaver, 1987.pdf
reveal aspects of an individual character or psychological makeup. Carl Jung was a psychiatrist best known for theories of the Collective Unconscious, in this assignment I took the personality test that Carl Jung created based off personality and behavior. When completing the test my personality trait revealed to me as ISFJ with an individual preference in four dimensions characterizing my personality type including Introvert (12%), Sensing (16%), Feeling (53%), and Judging (9%). After reading the analysis of each preference I noticed that I have a few similarities that relates to my personal life and wellbeing
... (2004). Contemporary Perspectives on the Psychology of Attitudes (Rev ed.). Florence, KY: Psychology Press.
Many philosophers and psychologist from Jean Piaget to William James have theorized what makes a person who they are, their identity. Jean Piaget believed that the identity is formed in the sensorimotor stage and the preoperational stage. This means that a child is forming his identity as late to the age of seven (Schellenberg, 29) However, identity is strongly impacted by society such as school, church, government,and other institutions. Through our interactions with different situations our personality develops (Schellenberg 34). "In most situations there is a more diversified opportunity for the development of social identities, reflecting what the individual wants to put forth to define the self as well as what others want to accept,"(Schellenberg 35). Therefore, humans, much like animals, adapt to different situations based on who they are with. Individuals are always changi...
One way in which the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) of personality differs from the Trait Theory (FFT), is that the SCT represents a bottom-up approach (Cervone, 1997; Shadel, Niaura and Abrams, 2000; Zelli and Dodge, 1999). In other
The tripartite framework is used to explore the formation of personal identity. The three levels of the structure include individual level, group level, and universal level.
McCrae, R. R., & Allik, I. U. (2002). The five-factor model of personality across cultures. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Every day, individuals are being influenced by the stimuli around them. Most of the time, they are not even aware that this is happening. Things seen, heard and experienced all come together to form an individual 's own idea about the world around them. This unconscious activation that predisposes individuals to certain responses and choices is called priming. Numerous studies have been conducted to determine if priming has an effect on consumer behavior and for the purpose of furthering the understanding the underlying effects of environmental primes on behavior. These studies have since exposed a cascade of priming effects on behavior.
McAdams, D. P. (2009). The person: An introduction to the science of personality psychology (5th ed.). Hoboken, N.J: Wiley.