When you or your loved one walks into a business or is invited onto private property , you expect to be walking into a safe environment. Business are responsible for taking certain measures to ensure the safety of you and your loved one. If you become injured because of a property owner 's failure to keep their property free from hazards, hidden or known, you may have a legal claim against the property owner. This is a premise liability case. Below are some frequently asked questions and answers regarding premise liability claims.
What is the most common type of premises liability claim?
The most common type of premise liability claim is slip and fall. If you have been involved in a slip in fall in a business or premises, contact a firm
…show more content…
Typically, the property owner owes a duty to ensure the premises is free from hidden and latent defects and a duty to exercise reasonable care on his or her property.
A licensee is someone who comes onto the property for his or her own purposes, like a salesman or a social guest. The landowner owes the licensee a duty to warn of a dangerous conditions that creates an unreasonable risk of harm.
A trespasser is someone who does not have a land-owner 's express or implied permission to be on his or her property. Generally, a landowner does not owe a duty to trespassers; however, there are some exceptions to this rule. Children, for example, are an exception to this rule. A land-owner owes a duty warn of dangers on the land if they know or reasonably should have known that children are likely to trespass. For example, a landowner who owes a trampoline, reasonably should know that children are likely to trespass on his or her property. With regard to adults, a landowner has a duty to provide warning of injury. For example: signs that say “electric fence” or “beware of dog” are reasonable warnings for trespassers to prevent
…show more content…
First, it is extremely important that you seek medical attention immediately. As a result of the dog bite, you are susceptible to deadly diseases and serious infection. Second, you should consider seeing a counselor. Being bitten by a dog is a traumatic experience. Often, as a direct result of the trauma of being bitten, a victim might have an irrational fear of animals, suffer from nightmares, or experience other symptoms associated with psychological trauma of being bitten by a dog.
Third, you should contact a firm of personal injury lawyers. The legal issues surrounding dog bites are often complex because most states (but not all) are strict liability jurisdictions. This means that dog owners are civilly liable for the dog bite as long as the victim neither trespassed nor provoked the dog. In some states, liability is automatic, while in others there are limitations upon it. A dog bite victim should seek counsel to determine if they reside in a strict liability state and to ensure they receive the maximum compensation allowed under the law.
Is there a time limit for filing
Cross, Frank B., and Roger LeRoy Miller. "Ch. 13: Strict Liability and Product Liability." The legal environment of business: text and cases, 8th edition. Mason, Ohio: Cengage Learning Custom Solutions, 2012. 294-297. Print.
National Canine Research Council. Investigative Report for Dog-Bite Related Fatalities 2009. National Canine Research Council, 2010. 6-48. Print.
Duty: The general rule for premises liability is that there is a duty to keep the premises in reasonably safe conditions. Vicky was a trespasser on the land because she had no express or implied consent to be there. In light of this relationship, because Vicky was a trespasser, under the traditional common law categories, there is no duty but to not willfully or wantonly harm the trespasser.
The issue is what duty of care did C.D. Management owe to Richard. Mounsey v. Ellard, held that a landowner owes a duty of reasonable care to all lawful visitors. 363 Mass. 693, 707 (1973). The Court stated “that there is significant difference in the legal status of one who trespasses on another's land as opposed to one who is on the land under some color of right-such as a licensee or invitee.” Id at n.7. Although the general rule for care owed to trespassers is to refrain from willful, wanton, or reckless conduct. Schofield v. Merrill 386 Mass. 244, 245 (1982). Mounsey allowed for the possibility of exceptions when dealing with trespassers, “The possible difference in classes of trespassers is miniscule compared to the
“Dog Bite: Fact Sheet.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC, 1 Apr. 2008. Web. 13
Strict liability arises in the animal context when the animal at issue is either a wild animal or a domestic animal with a known vicious propensity. This principle is the origin of the well-known “one bite” rule for dogs. Strict liability, sometimes called absolute liability, is the legal responsibility for damages, or injury, even if the person found strictly liable was not at fault or negligent. Under a rule of strict liability, proof of causation is a necessary condition for liability. The early common law distinguished between wild and domesticated animals for purposes of imposing liability on their owners. Owners of fierce or wild animals were absolutely liable for harm caused to others. However, owners of domesticated animals, such as dogs, were liable only if they had scienter; that is, the owners were liable only if they knew of the animal’s dangerous or mischievous propensities. Tort law has traditionally sought to balance the “usefulness” of an animal with the risk it represents to the public. Common law torts is a legal structure that seek to allocate risk among the members of society; the more valuable a particular activity to society, the more willing is the society, through its legal rules, to shift risk of the activity to others.
The standard for an invited person is higher as the RSPB undertakes to secure his welfare, the standard for a trespasser is objective and thus lower, as the trespasser is deemed to be an average person, and no regard is given to the idiosyncrasies of the trespasser: age, mental health. Evaluation The RSPB must take all reasonable measures to ensure its grounds are reasonably safe and that any disclaimers of safety offer greater protection to the visitor rather than just highlighting the risk. However, for trespassers, there must still be no overtly dangerous objects/circumstances upon RSPB property, though regard need not be given to particular characteristics of trespassers. Moreover, disclaimers ought to warn of the dangers but not necessarily offer any alternatives.
When an individual slips, trips or falls and sustains injuries because the surface he or she was walking on has some type of defect, or is slick, a lawsuit may be filed. Issues the frequently lead to a slip, trip or fall include ice, water, soap, oil, cracks or holes. These issues can cause an individual to lose his or her balance and fall to the floor. Elements of a Slip, Trip and Fall Case If an injury occurs due to the condition of a property, the injured has to prove that the property owner was negligent. Negligence refers to the property owner knowing about the problem and choosing to ignore it or that the owner should have been aware of the dangerous condition and failed to take action.
However, if the floor was wet for an extended period of time, it becomes more responsible to claim that the property owner or business should have cleaned the floor or put up the proper warning signs for customers. #4 How Slippery The Floor
Many people wander off the designated roads; they wind up onto private lands and can be charged with trespassing. These off-road vehicles are destroying private residence land. The owners are outraged and demand for the police to put a stop to illegal off-roading. All land owners encourage everyone to report and illegal off-roaders at WWW.Riversidesheriff.org/rove/. They say it is a disturbance and causes damage to their property. It is clear the off-roaders are not wanted or welcomed. When you drive off the designated trails, you are driving onto someone’s private land. It is important to keep in mind that if you are on someone’s land, you are trespassing and causing a disturbance. When you are driving behind houses in the desert, you need to be cautious in case a pet got loose, how would you feel if your companion got out and someone that was trespassing ran them over because they were being
Notably, the class of potential defendants in a product liability is extensive; it may include everyone in the distribution chain of the product (Wong 2010). The defendant may range from the manufacturer of the product to the seller or the lessor of the product. In addition, anyone who services the product or installs the product after purchase may stand liable in the event that the product is defective. Principally, the basis of action in a product liability litigation are the negligence, intent, strict liability, breach of implied warranty of merchantability, and general misrepresentation (Wong 2010). In practice, prosecutions in product liability have significantly relied on the Third Restatement of Torts, on section 402A
In short I had two things going against me, my weight and lack of experience. When going to touch base on the other side of a narrow bridge everyone made to the bridge except for me so the guard dog still had enough footing to give me a great big bite on the side of my chest next to my nipple. Right after I got bit I was laughed at and teased by saying that the dog wanted milk because everyone was able to get out of harm’s way but
This can include, but is not limited to the following: Anxiety resulting from the attack Infection resulting from the bite Other bodily injuries resulting from the attack Whether or not the dog bite resulted in an open wound, it is important to understand that there could be serious repercussions
Violators may be punished by a criminal sentence, a fine, or both. A defendant may also be required to remove a nuisance or to pay the costs of removal. For example, a manufacturer who has polluted a stream might be fined and might also be ordered to pay the cost of cleanup. Public nuisances may interfere with public health, such as in the keeping of diseased animals or a malarial pond. Public safety nuisances include shooting fireworks in the streets, storing explosives, practicing medicine without a license, or harboring a vicious dog. Brothels, illegal liquor establishments are examples of nuisances that interfere with public morals. Obstructing a highway or creating a condition to make travel unsafe or highly disagreeable are examples of nuisances threatening the public