Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The trial and death of socrates
Plato's trial and death of Socrates
Plato's trial and death of Socrates
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The trial and death of socrates
Socrates is the founding father of what is considered western philosophy. Socrates was the first person that one can identify as asking questions and pursuing answers to those questions. As a result, those questions and answers are now what we consider as one of the main aspects of philosophy. Those before Socrates, or the Pre-Socratics, asked questions and sought answers as well; however, their primary concern was based on mathematics and natural phenomenas. In contrast, Socrates primary focus was on that of the citizens of Athens. He focused on them by asking questions then debating their answers. Some of the questions that Socrates wanted answers to ideas and thoughts of what was goodness, what was morality, could virtue be taught and what was knowledge. These thoughts were totally different from those of the Pre-Socratics. …show more content…
In the later years of Socrates life, he faced charges of teaching the younger generation to disrespect the Gods of the city of Athens.
Likewise, the ancient Greeks believe that the same Gods protected their cities from natural disasters such as storms, flood and plagues as well as the invasion from other cities. For this reason, if Socrates were teaching the youth to disrespect the Gods, then there was a great chance that the city of Athens would be at harm by those natural disasters. As a result, Socrates was convicted of these charges of disrespecting the Gods and ultimately sentenced to death. In contrast, he was offered a reprieve however he would have give up doing philosophy, but Socrates refused because he believed that life without philosophy would be meaningless to him and he would rather died than survive yet not have any purpose on
life. Socrates receives his sentencing of death by the Athenian jury; however, he responds with a speech. Socrates explains that he has never lived a quiet, ordinary life as opposed to others. He states that he did not have the same interest as others cared about. He continues to go on in speech and say that he was too strict on himself with the principles to survive. For that reason, he tried to persuade each of the people of Athens to think outside of the box of more practical advantages than of his mental and moral well-being. Moreover, Socrates wanted everyone to think more of well-being in that case of the city of Athens or of anything for that matter. Socrates felt that because he was thinking of the betterment of everyone in the city of Athens that he did not deserve to be sentenced to death. Socrates stated “that it could be more appropriate for such a person than that of free maintenance at the state’s expense — he deserves it much more than any victor in the races at Olympia, whether he wins with a single horse or a pair or a team of four. These people give you the semblance of success, but I give you the reality; they do not need maintenance, but I do.” For this reason, Socrates was explaining that all he was trying to do was to get the people of Athens to see that by teaching the youth of the city of their well-being, it would be better off for the city; however, the Athenians did not see it in the same aspect as Socrates. Socrates believed that whenever wronged anyone intentionally; however, due to the short period of time, the Athenians were not convinced of the argument that Socrates presented. Socrates belief that a good life is a just and honorable one lead to his circumstances under which he would escape. Socrates denies that escaping execution is the right thing for him to do. While sitting in the prison cell waiting on his execution, Socrates is visited by his Crito who begs for him to escape and go to another city because he, Crito, is wealthy alongside of other friends of Socrates who will take care of him if he choses to escape. Socrates broke the covenants and the agreements which you made. Socrates has his choice and might have gone either to Lacedaemon or Crete because he always often praised them for their good government or to some other Hellenic or foreign State. Crito explained to Socrates that, “ [h]e seemed to be so fond of the State and now you run away and forsake your agreements — if you will take our advice, do not make yourself ridiculous by escaping out of the city.” Crito, along with others, explained to Socrates that if he escaped there would be no good to him or to his friends. Likewise, they also told him that they would be deprived of their citizenship, driven into exile and even lose their property. In addition, they told him that if he chose to escape to one of the neighboring well governed cities, he would be presented as an enemy to them. For this reason, their government would be against him. Socrates states “I hear the summering in my ears, like the sounds of a flute in the ears of the mystic; that voice, I say, is humming in my ears, and prevents me from hearing the voices of any other.” Socrates refusal to escape shows his belief that what is important is not life but a good life. On the day of Socrates execution, Crito and others were there as the execution occurred. Crito explained to Socrates that, “[a]ll he had to do was drink the poison and walk around until his legs became heavy, then lie down and from there the poison would work on its own.” Socrates took the cup of poison hemlock and drunk it instead of waiting the long execution period. As it drunk it and laid down once his legs began to get heavy to enter into what would be his final days of life. The hemlock would attack his central nervous system to gradually bring on paralysis and ultimately death. As he was lying there on his death bed, the uttered, “ Crito, we owe a cock to Asclepius - make the offering and don’t forget.” Ascleipios was the God of medicine. Socrates felt that he owed a debt to this God because of the poison that he just had that took that took his life. As one can see, Socrates stood in what he had a belief in. Socrates was accused of teaching the youth of Athens to disrespect the Gods of the city. However, Socrates believed that what he was charged for was for the betterment of the city of Athens. For this reason, he refused to escape from his punishment, yet he took the hemlock and faced his execution in a shorter period of time than that which was expected. Likewise, I believe that choosing not to escape but face his execution was a good decision in his aspect. By choosing not to escape, Socrates showed that his beliefs were greater than that of what the Athenians thought therefore he would face the consequence.
Socrates a classical Greek philosopher and character of Plato’s book Phaedo, defines a philosopher as one who has the greatest desire of acquiring knowledge and does not fear death or the separation of the body from the soul but should welcome it. Even in his last days Socrates was in pursuit of knowledge, he presents theories to strengthen his argument that the soul is immortal. His attempts to argue his point can’t necessarily be considered as convincing evidence to support the existence of an immortal soul.
In Walter Mosley’s Always Outnumbered, Always Outgunned, the reader is introduced to Socrates Fortlow, an ex-convict who served twenty-seven years for murder and rape. Fortlow is plagued by guilt and, seeing the chaos in his town, feels a need to improve not only his own standards of living, but also those of others in Watts. He attempts this by teaching the people in Watts the lessons he feels will resolve the many challenges the neighbourhood faces. The lessons Fortlow teaches and the methods by which he teaches them are very similar to those of the ancient Greek philosopher for whom Fortlow was named: “‘We was poor and country. My mother couldn’t afford school so she figured that if she named me after somebody smart then maybe I’d get smart’” (Mosley, 44). Though the ancient Greek was born to be a philosopher and Fortlow assumed the philosopher role as a response to the poor state of his life and Watts, both resulted in the same required instruction to their populations. The two Socrates’ both utilize a form of teaching that requires their pupil to become engaged in the lesson. They emphasize ethics, logic, and knowledge in their instruction, and place importance on epistemology and definitions because they feel a problem cannot be solved if one does not first know what it is. Socrates was essential in first introducing these concepts to the world and seemed to be born with them inherent to his being, Fortlow has learned the ideals through life experience and is a real-world application in an area that needs the teachings to get on track. While the two men bear many similarities, their differences they are attributed primarily as a result of their circumstances provide the basis of Fortlow’s importance in Watts and as a modern-...
Socrates was wise men, who question everything, he was found to be the wise man in Athens by the oracle. Although he was consider of being the wises man alive in those days, Socrates never consider himself wise, therefore he question everything in order to learned more. Socrates lived a poor life, he used to go to the markets and preach in Athens he never harm anyone, or disobey any of the laws in Athens, yet he was found guilty of all charges and sentence to die.
D.J Ciraulo, “On the Trail and Death of Socrates” which is chapter one is based on an Apology. Chapter one has a main charter named Plato. The author says, “Plato style of thinking and questioning is not only relevant to the beginning of science and politics, but is foundational to the next two thousand years of theology” (Ciraulo3). Plato explains the logical thought of death and which it stands at, what is human death? How can we determine that it has occurred? In the Introduction it quotes, that death is the defining condition of our humanity and How so? (Ciraulo ix). This chapter from Plato point of view he’s sees things his way. He informs the reader about the sciencefic thoughts but he doesn’t agree with everything. Plato was
Socrates: A Gift To The Athenians As Socrates said in Apology by Plato, “...the envy and detraction of the world, which has been the death of many good men, and will probably be the death of many more…”(Philosophical Texts, 34) Throughout history, many leaders have been put to death for their knowledge. In Apology, Socrates- soon to be put to death- says he was placed in Athens by a god to render a service to the city and its citizens. Yet he will not venture out to come forward and advise the state and says this abstention is a condition on his usefulness to the city.
Socrates has been leading a philosophical life and spends his whole life examing what the truth is. The truth here is a tangible truth, whereas it is more likely to be the rules or the orders of the world. In Socrates’s defense, he expresses the idea that he is a gift or a messenger that is sent to Athenians by the god. His task is to talk to others and then discuss intriguing and valuable problems with people in order to find out the most worthy and useful truth and wisdom for human beings because humans only know a little about themselves and the world in fact. “Whereas just as I don’t know anything, I don’t think I do either.” ( The
Socrates is as a person who is profoundly wise, a person who has understood planes of reality far higher than what is understood by most people. He is depicted as one who has been outside the cave and who is no longer imprisoned by the illusions of the ordinary world. He is depicted as a skilled communicator who can ask people to question and examine even their most cherished assumptions. The Socratic Method is based on a dialogue between two or more people who may hold differing views, but wish to pursue the truth by seeking agreement with one another, Socrates used it quite differently in that he believed that knowledge was instinctive and could be brought out by means of skillful questioning. In many ways, Socrates resembled the Sophists.
Socrates is easily one of the most well known names in the history of philosophy. He is even portrayed via the magic of Hollywood time travel in the popular movie “Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure” and was more recently quoted inaccurately on a t-shirt as saying, “I drank what?” Despite his fame, Socrates was not the first philosopher by far, and certainly not the earliest to make meaningful contributions to the field of philosophy. Some of the great “Pre-Socratics” include Anaximenes, Parmenides, Xenophane, and Democritus. The philosophical issues of their days were significantly different from the popular discussions today, though no less relevant, and provide ample fodder for the cannon of philosophical consideration. The issues in consideration here that may benefit from discussion are the problem of the one and the many, the distinction between phusis and nomos as regards the nature of god(s), and distinction between appearance and reality. Appropriate and thorough discussion of these topics in the pre-Socratic context is certain to yield insight into the connection between these three issues.
Socrates was a Greek philosopher who lived from 469-399 B.C.E. Socrates believed that Philosophy was primarily a social activity, which in fact he made use of quite often. He would find himself roaming the streets of Athens questioning the youth or just anyone who would give him the chance to talk to them. Furthermore, Socrates questions drove people absolutely insane, until the point of absolute consternation if you will. He tried proving a point which is quoted “Look, here we are, two ignorant men, yet two, men who desire to know. I am willing to pursue the question seriously if you are” (Palmer, 31).Ultimately, this meant that the person Socrates was questioning actually didn’t know anything at all, just as well as Socrates himself, so which for the both of them would remain in search of the truth.
Socrates was the first of the three great philosophers. Before devoting his life to his teachings and philosophies, he was a stonemason and also served as a soldier of some distinction during the Peloponnesian war. He never wrote any of his teachings down, and he preferred to speak about his beliefs and philosophies. He also involved himself with the political workings of Athens. He spent most of his life in discussion with young aristocratic men, unrelentingly questioning their blind confidence in popular opinion, but he never offered them any outlined abstract teaching. He merely conversed and questioned their beliefs. Also, unlike other Sophists of the time, he refused to accept pay for his teachings.
Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle all had a big impact on Western Civilization and did so in their own unique way but each one’s concepts lasted long after their initial ideas appeared. Socrates’s concepts were the first time a person went against the beliefs and philosophies of the time. His most influential impact was on ethics. He believed that people should behave in a good and gracious manner regardless of the outcome. He did not feel like a person should be selfish and think of only their wants. He also felt that people should not push their ways and beliefs on others just because they had the power and could. His beliefs were important to ethics today because he felt that a person would be happy if they acted morally good regardless
“Love is difficult to define, and there maybe different definitions. But one definition of love, is an utter, absolute, and unqualified wish for the other’s happiness” (). One of the most important Greek philosophers in Western history, Socrates contributed to many theories, and impacted the field of ethics throughout his life. He was well known in Athens for his knowledge and teachings to the youth. He was the creator of Socratic irony and the Socratic method, both used to convey his lessons to the Athenians. Socrates had many disciples throughout his life including Plato, one of the more popular students. Plato is the author of many philosophical writings, many of which are about Socrates. He questioned the idea of virtue and studied the
It is the twenty-first century; technology has evolved, ideas have changed, and morals have progressed. Yet, students of this century are still using the age-old Socratic method to discover new ideas, increase knowledge, and clarify concepts, not because it is traditional, but because it is effective. The Socratic method, which is a type of pedagogy that utilizes a dialectical approach, is a tool that people use to nurture their critical thinking skills. To add, this technique was created by the classical Greek philosopher Socrates, with the intention of developing his students’ critical thinking abilities. The elenchus started with Socrates’ interlocutor stating a disprovable thesis,
Lavine explains in his book From Socrates to Sartre, these points of not only Socrates' defense, but of his philosophy as well. “The only true wisdom,” he writes, “consists in knowing that you know nothing” (15). Lavine describes the second point as “[. . .] the improvement or 'tendance' of the soul, the care for wisdom and truth, is the highest good. [. . .] Virtue does not come from money, but from virtue comes money and every other good thing for mankind, public and private” (15). Lavine describes the third point as the Athenians throwing a gift back in the face of their own gods. Socrates' point being that their gods sent him “to be stirred by [his] sting” (16). Socrates' final defense was, as explained by Lavine, “If virtue is knowledge, and if to know the good is to do the good, then wrongdoing comes only from failure to know what is good. [. . .] if you really understood the right thing to do, you would have done it”
Gregory Vlastos commented in his book Socrates: The Ironist and Moral Philosopher, “Such is his strangeness that you will search and search among those living now and among men of the past, and never come close to what he is himself and to the things he says.” (Vlastos). Gregory makes an important point; although studying Plato gives us a glimpse of Socrates, it only gives a glimpse of him through Plato’s eyes. We can study this text and others and never understand exactly who this man is. Even if we had writings of Socrates’s own hands it would be difficult to understand this complicated man. On the other hand the writings we do have, including the