Discussion of the Pre-Socratics

1766 Words4 Pages

Discussion of the Pre-Socratics

Socrates is easily one of the most well known names in the history of philosophy. He is even portrayed via the magic of Hollywood time travel in the popular movie “Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure” and was more recently quoted inaccurately on a t-shirt as saying, “I drank what?” Despite his fame, Socrates was not the first philosopher by far, and certainly not the earliest to make meaningful contributions to the field of philosophy. Some of the great “Pre-Socratics” include Anaximenes, Parmenides, Xenophane, and Democritus. The philosophical issues of their days were significantly different from the popular discussions today, though no less relevant, and provide ample fodder for the cannon of philosophical consideration. The issues in consideration here that may benefit from discussion are the problem of the one and the many, the distinction between phusis and nomos as regards the nature of god(s), and distinction between appearance and reality. Appropriate and thorough discussion of these topics in the pre-Socratic context is certain to yield insight into the connection between these three issues.

The problem of the one and the many consists of two parts that are quite evident in the one and the many. The one is used in referring to that which is a unifying force in many theories of the universe; it is that from which all things are made and that to which all things return, most theories consider it an indestructible non-creatable substance infinite in existence at least but on occasion infinite in diversity. Sometimes philosophers use the one to explain a theory of Arche, which refers to the originating order of all that is. The many refers to that which ...

... middle of paper ...

... nomos and appearance versus reality. Finally, it can be seen that all of these concepts are intermingled; the reason that the pre-Socratics found these topics so intriguing was their search for an “arche” or originating order. All of these issues need to be addressed in order for a society to answer its questions about its roots. Perhaps the most intriguing fact of this matter is that these philosophers have not provided the final answer, if they had we wouldn’t still find the questions and our search for “arche” so interesting today.

“It is proper that you should learn all things, both the unshaken heart of well rounded truth, and the opinions of mortals, in which there is no true reliance.” (Parmenides, Fragment 1)

Citations

Baird, Forrest E. Philosophic Classics Volume 1 Ancient Philosophy Third Edition Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ; 2000

Open Document