Power Dynamics In Jane Eyre

699 Words2 Pages

Power dynamics in Bronte’s Jane Eyre have been examined in a multitude of ways, including the centralisation of slaves and masters (Zonana), and Dupras’ reading of the importance of economic status and depravity. However, this critical response will focus on how the ultimate form of power, and therefore the formation of power dynamics, stems from Jane’s position as an unreliable, biased narrator. The extract from chapter twenty-seven, wherein Rochester tells Jane about Bertha’s voyage and confinement to Thornfield, ultimately displays how Jane as the narrator challenges the influence of masculinity, and how power structures are superimposed by female narrative voice. Similarly, how Jane’s voice furthers power imbalances between her and Bertha, …show more content…

This is shown through Rochester’s display of bigamy later in the extract; Jane narrates an arguably accurate account of Rochester’s speech, lamenting he was “convinced that I could and ought” remarry. Bronte’s use of language such as “convinced” gives connotations in this instance of male entitlement, as Rochester refuses to acknowledge or follow known law. Similarly, the use of “ought” gives insight into Rochester’s views of his own superiority; arguably, he believes he has a right to ignore his pre-existing wife due to her madness. Here, masculinity is being presented in a detrimental way by Jane, as the primarily negative aspects of Rochester’s character are being displayed. Kaufman suggests that “men’s social power is the source of individual power.” As Jane controls how readers view Rochester’s masculinity and therefore his social power through narrative voice, it can therefore be suggested through Kaufman’s idea that Jane also controls Rochester’s individual power. This both serves to heighten the power of women as they implicitly control the presentation of men, and lessen the impact of Rochester’s status. Therefore, Jane as the narrator provides her with an ultimate source of power, as she dictates how those with the ultimate source of power in society are …show more content…

If we pursue the idea of Jane having power over the presentation of narrative detail, then it is prudent to suggest that she allows for the continued oppression of Bertha by allowing Rochester’s dehumanizing language to stay present within the extract. Language such as “monster in the vessel” and “goblin” are expressed by Rochester and incorporated without question into the narrative by Jane, which traditionally have animalistic, primitive connotations. This immediately paints Bertha as less than a woman, and elevates Jane’s status as the pure “dove” in both Rochester’s eyes and the eyes of the contemporary reader. Therefore, Bertha as a feral, goblin-like creature gives Jane power to re-enforce commonly accepted racial stereotypes of the Other, and make integration seem detrimental to progression due to narrative choices. This further marginalises Bertha in the eyes of contemporary society, thus highlighting how power over the narrative can influence equality, as omissions to Rochester’s language could have been made to strengthen sympathy for Bertha’s position. However, Alexandra Nygren argues that Jane is “unintentionally complicit” in the oppression of Bertha, as she is already heavily influenced by society’s rigid views on the Orient. This idea takes explicit blame away from Jane in her narrative choices; nevertheless, even Jane’s ignorance still influences the

Open Document