Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on cultural differences
Example of differences in cultural boundaries
An essay on cultural differences
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on cultural differences
At the National Gallery of Art in Washington D.C, stands a home for discovered sculptors of the Hellenistic World. This home is known as the Power and Pathos exhibition. Here lies the Portrait of a Ruler, a monumental bronzed head sculpted in Ancient Greece during 310-290 BCE. Although the sculptor is unknown , this figure is exemplary of how sculptors of the Hellenistic period used physical and emotional expressions to create godly figures. In this visual analysis and comparison, the physical and emotional features of the Portrait of a Ruler will be explicated in order to develop an understanding of the sculpture.
The Portrait of a Ruler is a very large sculpture of a young male’s face/head. The face expression of the figure seems to be gloomy.
…show more content…
Bronze allows the sculpture to remain stable despite the fact that the only support it’s receiving is a metal rod and a small base. It stands stationary without any additional support. The bronze also has a tremendous relationship with the light. When light hits the bronzed surface, it gleams in a profound way. The highest points of his face—the forehead, nose bridge, cheekbones, chin and philtrum reflect the most light and outline the face vertically down the center and across the eyes. As a result, the entire face appears illuminated. This effects makes the sculpture look even more godly thus emphasizing its …show more content…
The Head of a Man is more stylized in comparison to the Portrait of a Ruler, which is more naturalistic. The Head of a Man has features that are far from ordinary human characteristics. For example, the large over-arched eyebrows and large eyes are disproportioned to the face. The hair on his head lacks lines that represent individual strands of hair. It appears more flat thus lacks three-dimensional features. It has stylized diamonds shapes to portray braided hair. Although the long, curly beard from the Head of a Man and the curly, flowing hair of the Portrait of a Ruler are both stylized, the beard appears much more solid and firm than the curly hair. Therefore, the curly hair appears more life-like and natural. On the other hand, the sizes of the sculptures express the opposite idea. Since the Head of a Man is life-sized, and the Portrait of a Ruler is beyond life-size the Head of a Man appears more human-like in that aspect. In addition, the sculptures also express different emotions. The Head of a Man is smiling and has a more elevated facial expression while the Portrait of a Ruler is gloomy and solemn. This suggests that their people may have viewed their rulers differently or it may simply say something about the kind of rulers they were. Regardless, this is evidence of cultural differences in
In this paper I am exploring “Portrait of Augustus as general” and “Khafre enthroned”. From exploring and getting to know the Statues in my Art History Book I have compared these statues (Kleiner, 2013). The first and most obvious similarity between the two is in the artists’ idealization and immortalization of their subjects. Both Khafre and Augustus are portrayed in an idealized manner, designed to give the impression of nobility, timelessness, and divinity. The two statues were the political advertisements of their times that showed the public images of reliable leaders who one
There are several differences between the sculpture of Menkaure and Khamerernebty, and the sculpture of Akhenaten and Nefertiti.
If one came close to the figure’s stomach where there’s the seafoam green, one can see the strong mark makings of the paint brushes and knife strokes, making the paint come out of the canvas. Similarly, Brown also uses big paint strokes of different colors to direct viewer’s eyes around the artwork. For instance, on the left side of the figure, there is a big vertical downward motion of a brush stroke in maroon, that connects to a green streak that goes up and encompasses the figure’s head and then downward to the body of the figure, which outlines and pushes the figure to stand out. And to make our eyes go back to the figure, Brown paints a blue triangle on the chest, making it a focal point due to it’s dark color that stands out of the light colors. And if someone stood facing the side of the painting, one can see the thick globs of paint that would make the viewer take a double glance to see if it was either a painting or a sculpture, which reinforces the idea that the painting is coming alive and making one feel
In conclusion, although Mycerinus and Kha-merer-nebty II and Augustus of Primaporta, do appear very different, come from entirely different geographic regions and were separated by thousands of years, they do have many things in common. When we consider subject, style, and function; perhaps other works of art have more in common than they appear to have.
Both pieces to me seem to represent godlike features. For example, in the palette the king is shown as larger than his enemies and in the stele the king is standing over the people and is much higher than them. As rulers, they are both depicted as strong and heroic and as humans, they are depicted as
The subject does not accurately depict the human anatomy. In fact, while studying this figure, one may notice that geometric shapes make up many of the limbs. For example, the artist uses ovals to represent the palm of the hands, the shoulders and the knees. The man's chest is in the form of squares with rounded edges and with perfect little white circles as nipples. This...
In conclusion, the portrayal of ancient rulers is dependent not only on the style of art popular during the era, but also on the evolution of the political climate. The portrayal of Menkaure, a pharaoh of the Old Kingdom in ancient Egypt, is of complete authority, control and power. His face does not show concern or grief over his people, because he is not challenged politically, the image of control coincides with his sole power over the kingdom. While the depiction of Alexander the Great, in ancient Greek coins is deified. Alexander’s leadership ended with world domination; therefore, his deified portrayal on monetary funds is particularly appropriate. By contrast, Philip the Arab’s portrait sculpture almost resembles a present day photograph with its capture of fleeting expression. This expression of anxiety and sadness is a representation of the political turmoil during the time period of his rule. Taking the progress of ancient cultures into account, how does the art of sculpting improve in the manipulation of the medium used?
Also, the sculpture named Kroisos (Kouros from Anavysos). ca. 540-525 BCE. Compare with the Kouros, both of them are freestanding, painted sculpture. Kroisos has a greater body than Kouros, and I can image that the flesh, sinew and bones inside the stone. And as for Kroisos’s facial expression is more naturalistic than Kouros. His lips are drawn up that becomes an artificial smile, I mean the archaic smile, but not reflect in his
‘The representation of the human form likewise served to stress essential data about the subject. The shoulders are nearly in frontal view to show the width of the body and not obscure the far arm, while the chest was represented in profile to show its contour…....
This sculpture seems to epitomize the ideal male human form. All of the body parts seem perfectly proportioned and the muscles are beautifully defined as if the image were of an athlete. The image is youthful with a calm demeanor. The right missing forearm looks as if it used to be resting at his side, while the left elbow was probably at a 90 degree angle, with the hand holding something. The slight bend in the left leg gives the impression of movement, as if the image was frozen while walking. The counterpoised stance adds an air of nobility to the "man".
Let’s begin with what was going on during the time period for each sculpture. During the 2458-2446 BCE. Userkaf was thriving over his brother Sahure, and he became the new ruler of Egypt. In the start of 2446 BCE, Neferirkare beings his dominant over Egypt. King Sahure and Nome God is a high relief it is still attached to a surface of a stone. The Pharaoh sitting on his thorn wearing a Nemes headdress (it is usually blue and gold striped), fake beard. The king has an emotionless facial expression. It was made for a decoration for the king pyramid complex. The symbol behind this statue could be the gathering of the Nome gods form Upper and Lower Egypt around t...
He was the victim of adultery and murdered by his wife’s lover after coming home from war. The sculptured face shows his importance based on the fact that it is composed of gold and that represents wealth and status.
The blue oval tiles that make up the majority of the body are geometric, for example, and the multiple gold fish and starfish found at the base of the sculpture are organic. Proportion and scale are the principles of design that assemble this sculpture as a whole. The size of this sculpture can make one believe that a mythical creature can be this size in the world Gay created. In this made-up world we expect the size of this sculpture to be to scale. The proportion is the relationship between parts of a whole, for example, the head to the rest of the body as it thins out the closer you get to the end of the tail.
For the final project, I will compare works of art from the Quest for Immortality and the two pieces I chose are Statuettes of worshippers, from the Square Temple of Eshnunna and Epic of Gilgamesh. For my visual work of art, I chose The Votive Figures which date back to 2900-2600 B.C.E. and for my literary piece of art I chose The Epic of Gilgamesh which predates by 1500 years. I will compare these two pieces of art that share a common theme and also link the contemporary connection within each piece. Votive Figures are various in sizes and are usually carved in gypsum or limestone and were mined from the Square Temple in Eshunna which is the present day Iraq. They portray men wearing fringed skirts and women wearing tufted dresses draped over their shoulder.
Here, we will be looking at a rendition of the high marble statue of Augustus Caesar known as “Augustus of Prima Porta.” Originating from 1st Century A.D., it is said that there is a possibility that the original sculpture could have been of greek descent. Upon a general overview of the sculpture, one can see that Augustus fulfils a millitarial role of some kind. From his very stance to the garments portrayed on him, Augustus is draped in a decorative cuirass and a tunic, accompanied by a figure of Cupid clutching on to his right calf. After taking the general themes of the work into account, one can then began to start unraveling the many symbolic elements embedded into the sculpture that allude to godly themes. Starting from the crown of his head, the very chiselment and structure of his face gives the work a youthful element to it, even though some say that Augustus was around 40 years old. A recurring theme within Greek and Roman culture is the matter of godliness and immortality amongst idolized figures themselves. This idea is usually depicted by displaying powerful human being in a younger light. This