Portrait of a Man in a Red Turban is an oil painting by the Early Netherlandish master Jan van Eyck, from 1433. It has been in the National Gallery, London since 1851, and it is considered to be one of the greatest paintings ever. The original frame survives and has the painted inscription JOHES DE EYCK ME FECIT ANO MCCCC.33. 21. OCTOBRIS ("Jan van Eyck Made Me on October 21, 1433") at the bottom and at the top the motto AlC IXH XAN ("I Do as I Can"), which appears on other van Eyck paintings, always written in Greek letters, and include es a pun on his name. The subject is often thought to be van Eyck himself, though there is no direct evidence for this. (Portrait of a man, (self-portrait?))
In fact, the man in this portrait is unknown, no
…show more content…
Eyck developed special techniques that gave his painting a sense of light and depth. Moreover, this painting has political and religious values and the form shows a sharp and detailed analysis of the physical lines to highlight depth and accuracy. (Art Analysis of “Man in a Red Turban” and “The School of Athens”, 2005). Jan van Eyck also used a number of elements of arts combined to improve the look and feel of the painting. For example, he has emphasized blood vessels and skin wrinkles that are clearly visible to the viewer. Additionally, details can be seen in the bright oil colors and the strokes that outline the earmarks. The artist also used tenebrism to illuminate the line details looking at the face that he has completely illuminated; noting that tenebrism is a style of painting where the artist highlight the contrast between dark tones and light. The turban is also brightened to show the details especially around the ears of the person. Depth is also demonstrated in the engravings around the frame. (Portrait of a Man in a Red Turban (1433), 2010). Moreover, Jan van Eyck has used space to create depth between the dark background, the light foreground. Nevertheless, the areas around the figure are dark to show that the person sitting is coming from a dark area, so the use of negative space
Albrecht Durer-Self Portrait at Age 28: This self-portrait was painted in 1500 shortly afore Durer’s 29th day of inchoation. In the painting Durer is visually perceived in a Christ like pose where he directly faces the viewer. Traditionally at the time this particular pose was reserved for portraits of Christ and typically artists would surmise a three quarters pose with the artist conventionally facing the right of the viewer. Durer’s visible hand is perhaps one of the most striking components of the painting, the placement can be thought of as pointing to the sacred heart of Christ. It should withal be noted that the placement of the fingers can be optically discerned as an “A” and a “D” betokening Albrecht Durer or Anno Domini. The set of Durer’s oc...
The chosen art work is "Miracle of St. Dominic." This painting is a tempera on panel, painted by the Renaissance artist Taddeo di Bartolo, in the year thirteen sixty three. The painting is currently housed at the McNay Art Museum, measuring approximately 10" high by 10" wide. In this particular painting we are witnessing a miracle by St. Dominical. There are spectators and a horse that lays above the man in red, who St. Dominical has brought back to life.
Arnolfini Double Portrait was painted in 1434, by Jan van Eyck; who hard already gained attention and admiration through earlier works, such as the Ghent Altarpiece. The subject of Arnolfini Double Portrait, also known as The Arnolfini Portrait, is the italian merchant Giovanni Di Nicolao Arnolfini and his first wife inside of a room filled with objects teeming with symbolism. The depth is divided into a familiar three layers, a foreground, which is composed of a dog and a pair of sandals; a middle ground which features the two main subjects of the painting; and background, which contains the rest of the objects in the painting. The painting is symmetrical and the vanishing point is not far from the center of the painting along the horizontal. The paining is filled with symbolism and items meant to portray the subjects' distinguished lifestyle. Although, what some of the objects actually symbolize can be interpreted in slightly varying ways. To begin, many of the ob...
The two painters Jan Van Eyck (c.1390-1441) and Hans Memlinc (d.1494) are both considered great masters of Northern Art. Van Eyck is known for his execution of naturalistic detail and creating translucency in his panels. Memlinc is known for his financially minded cornucopia of work and for revolutionising the genre of portraiture. However, their differences are more pointed than there similarities. Both artists are mindful of the traditions of the Flemish school, such a the use of light to create a sense of the third dimension on the panel and the importance of landscape and background. Both artists worked in Bruges at some point; Van Eyck was an earlier master who moved to Bruges in 1430 until his death. Memlinc was German but settled there in 1465 until his death. The paintings by Van Eyck that shall be discussed are The Ghent Altarpiece, Madonna with Chancellor Rolin, Portrait of a Man and The Portrait of Giovanni Arnolfini and his Wife. The paintings by Memlinc that will be discussed are The Diptych of Maarten Nieuwenhove, Portrait of a Young Man Before a Landscape and The Donne Altarpiece.
The man’s eyes are closed and his mouth is slightly open. The colours of the painting shades of blue, and there is a flatness to the painting. The only break in color is the brown guitar. Like other paintings at this time, the mas is assumed to be poor. There is an overall sense of depression and tragedy.
The major structures in the painting consist of an umber colored cross and three ladders. Starting from the top of the image, there is an old man with a scraggly, white beard holding onto and leaning over the top beam of the cross. He is set off by color, wearing a bright red gown and azure head wrap. The majority of his body rests atop the cross while he stands on the ladder that is leaning on the back of the cross.
The essay How You See Yourself by Nicholas Mirzoeff discusses the evolution of art. The author discusses the use of art to represent changing identities over the years including cultural practices and societal expectations. The selfie, according to Nicholas Mirzoeff’s essay, is the equivalent of a self-portrait in the previous centuries preceding the technological development required for the present day selfie. The essay explores the different periods and the significance of art, particularly self-portraits, the selfies of the time, and their development over time. The author focuses on different themes including heroism, gender definition, and the focus of an image. Mirzoeff effectively provides examples illustrating and reinforcing the themes he highlights in his essay.
Seidel, Linda. "Jan van Eyck's Arnolfini Portrait": Business as Usual? Critical InquiryVol. 16, No. 1 (Autumn, 1989), pp. 54-86 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1343626
This painting, measuring about six-by-seven feet, is a massive work that draws viewers directly to it once they enter the room in which its displayed. It is not covered by any glass and is in a very well-lit area, thus it allows viewers to stand as close as possible to see the details of how Peter Paul Rubens handled his medium. Looking at the painting from a photograph is much different than viewing it up close and in person, because when looking at a photograph, one cannot see the texture of the paint that gives the painting its very delicate, unique, and realistic quality. The work appears to be in very good condition because most of the colors are still very rich and vibrant, such as Adonis’ red garment (Rubens). Although one cannot tell when directly viewing the piece, it has been said that previous use of radiographs for further analysis on the painting uncovered that initially, “Rubens gave A...
Faggin, Giorgio T and Hughes, Robert. The Complete Paintings of the Van Eycks. New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1976. Print.
In this self-portrait Durer portrays himself in the guise of the Savior. Durer's natural resemblance to Christ has been reverently amplified (Hutchinson 67). His bearded face is grave, and fringed by lustrous shoulder-lenth hair painted in a dark, Christ-like brown (Russell 89. Scholars have called attention to the fact that, the portrait was intended to portray Durer as the "thinking" artist through emphasis on the enlarged eyes and the right hand. Duere's use of the full-face view and almost hypnotic gaze "emphasizes his belief that the sense of sight is the most noble of the five senses." He wrote in the Introduction to his Painter's Manual, "For the noblest of man's senses is sight… Therefore a thing seen is more believable and long-lasting to us than something we hear" (Hutchison 68).
The composition of the painting takes place with the square of the canvas. The square is approximately 5' x 5'. A black frame surrounding the painting protrudes approximately 4" off the canvas. There is a 1" inlay between the canvas and frame. From this square, Reinhardt breaks the composition into six equal squares in three even rows. Texture is no where to be found in the painting. No visual indication of the artist's brush stroke is present. No varnished glare is given off by the piece. The entire work, including the frame, is completely matte. The squares take up the entire canvas in a checkerboard type arrangement. Each square is a slightly different shade of blue-black. It almost becomes impossible to see the difference between each square. The middle squares in the top and bottom rows shift more towards blue than the rest of the squares. The division of these middle squares become more obvious than the others. When the painting is looked at from a distance, it is almost impossible to see any of the squares at all. When looking from a far, all a viewer can see is a blackish blue canvas. As you stare longer into the painting, a halo begins to form around the corners of the canvas, creating a circle inside the square. Once you look away from the canvas, the circle is gone. With this observation in mind, we could say that the painting most definitely relies on the viewer. A viewer is required to look at the piece for its full affect. We could say that the squares in the painting are self-contained.
This painting by Vincent Van Gogh is on display at the Art Institute of Chicago Museum, in the Impressionism exhibit. There are many things going on in this painting that catch the viewer’s eye. The first is the piece’s vibrant colors, light blues and browns, bright greens, and more. The brush strokes that are very visible and can easily be identified as very thick some might even say bold. The furniture, the objects, and the setting are easy to identify and are proportioned to each other. There is so much to see in this piece to attempt to explain in only a few simple sentences.
A self portrait is normally a painting of the painter itself. The painting is a tangible piece of art because it is
Paintings of different time periods have their own unique styles which lead to the different styles of work even though they have the same theme. Comparing Gerbrand van den Eeckhout's work to Michelangelo's work and the work on the doors of Bishop Bernward, the artists use different techniques to depict the same topic of works-the fall of man, which makes different understandings and expressions on the audience. Assessing the style of the work, Eeckhout's work is close to the baroque style compared to Michelangelo's one. The baroque art pays greater attention to the use of color and shadow, more romanticism and pursues the balance of the composition.