Popcorn Cost Benefit Analysis

1019 Words3 Pages

Popcorn at the movies for an individual is a necessity and now since the upcoming movies are going to be overwhelming and daring so the demand for popcorn will be through the roof. The Economic Principle that is applied here is Cost – Benefit analysis (Opportunity Cost) which basically means that The cost of an item is what you give up to get that item. Henceforth, in this case the consumers have given up the price of popcorn for the benefit of eating while being entertained let the movie be a dud or a blockbuster.
This paper empirically analyses the concession sales data by observing the detailed income statistics for a chain of movie theatres all over the word. Prices for goods such as ink for printers, blades for razors and concessions at …show more content…

Movie-theatre popcorn is mainly known as one of the World’s biggest rip-offs, with a selling price of eight times what it costs to make. It’s been predicted that movie theatres make an 87% revenue at the concessions stand on overpriced candy, hotdogs, soda nachos and, well of course, popcorn.
Generally, stores around the world will keep changing the price tags to end in .99 and discounting their items during the weekends. But seeing a price end in this number is really common that consumers barely notice the tremendously effective sales ploy. This is based on the economic principle of Not-All-Costs Matter which basically means that some costs matter (Opportunity Costs) while other costs don’t (Sunk Costs) when making decisions. In this case the consumers care about the prices that end in .99, it is also called Psychological …show more content…

When the lipsticks are being priced at $36 and $38.99, 54% purchased the more expensive lipstick. Whereas, when the prices of the lipsticks were $32.99 and $35.00, just 20% purchased the higher valued one. Such a huge change in a behaviour in response to such small changes in the prices seem pretty difficult to square with usual models of rationality. But it is quite simple to understand that if an individual imagines a consumer that concentrates completely on the left most digit. To such a consumer, the prices would look like $36 and $38 in the first situation and $32 and $35 in the second situation and thus the changes from the first situation to the second situation would appear bigger than what they really

Open Document