Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of youth leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of youth leadership
Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, more commonly known as Pompey the Great, conquered
many lands during the 100’s BCE. As a young general, he had much to learn, that at an early
age, he had already distinguished himself as a great leader. Pompey’s term as consul
strengthened Rome, through his powerful and effective ruling.
Pompey’s rise in power as such a young general, could not have been accomplished
without the help of Sulla- one of Pompey’s father’s close friends. In the beginning of the Civil
War, between rivals Sulla and Marius, Pompey’s father supported Marius- so, by default, so did
Pompey. Soon after the death of Pompey’s father, he provided his army and resources to Sulla.
The people he once was trying to help, he was now mercilessly executing, and these Marion
leaders could do nothing but surrender (Cawthorne 20). Sulla, impressed by Pompey’s
demeanor, allowed him to join forces with him, which was the first step to Pompey’s rise to
glory. He soon sent him to Picenum, Eastern Italy, Sicily, and Africa to wipe out the rest of the
Marion leaders (Grossman OL). At this young age of about 23, Pompey was given a triumph
although he was still an equestrian or low in power. Sulla was not necessarily happy about
giving Pompey the triumph, since he had just finished celebrating his own, and was not certain
Pompey deserved it (Roberts 595). After this parade, was when people started to call him
Pompey “the Great.” Because of how grateful and impressed Sulla was, Pompey was then
married to Sulla’s stepdaughter.
After this marriage, things started to become complicated within Pompey and Sulla’s
relationship. Sulla began to notice Pompey’s growing prestige and they hit a bump (Everitt 73...
... middle of paper ...
... element of surprise, since a lot of
Pompey’s army was elsewhere. Caesar knew it would take time for Pompey to organize his
army, so he attacked. His tactic worked and his legendary speed surprised Pompey and threw all
of Rome into a panic. One by pne people began to lose confidence in Pompey and blame him for
what happened (Freeman 244). He narrowly escaped death at his camp when it was attacked, and
decided to take refuge with King Ptolemy of Egypt. However, Ptolemy didn’t want to offend
Caesar, the obvious winner. So as soon as Pompey stepped on shore he was shot and killed
(Lawthorne 21).
Although he lost, Pompey had helped Rome as a whole with his organized and powerful
ruling. This young general accomplished a lot until his death, much more than many others.
People such as Pompey have helped to strengthen Rome, and create history.
Events which stretch as far back as the reforms of the Gracchi brothers’ meant that the Rome was facing a Republic that was already deteriorating before Pompey had stepped into power. While Pompey’s quest for power was harmful, many other factors were also baleful to the Republic, and were hence instrumental in its decline. Gnaeus Pompeius’s measures to gain power were harmful because it was primarily a paradox to the principles of being part of a Republic with all its notions of shared and short power. The fundamental reason why there were other reasons for the decline of the system are that the military power was given to him, the already weak Senate, and the fact that Pompey was not the only player in the breakdown of the Republic due to the alliances he had made with Crassus and Caesar.
In contrast to the publicity spin of today’s tabloids, ‘losers attract notoriety,’ (Fear, 2008, p, 6) Roman society was no different with one’s reputation of paramount importance and continually defended. Antony and Cleopatra’s union was ammunition for Octavian and propaganda used against the couple in their pursuing battle of Actium. (Fear, 2008, p.7.)
everything he was about to the people and didn't hold anything back, and it wore on him
According to, Franco Cavazzi, a current accredited unprejudiced Roman Historian, Sulla’s first major achievement was becoming Marius’s Lieutenant. Marius was not a Roman nor patrician but still managed to be elected 7 times, he lead the army to many victories and was well recognised for them. (Gill, N.S. 2014) (Cavazzi, F. 2002) It was during Sulla’s service under Marius’s command in the military, that many of Sulla’s character traits were cultivated that contributed to the way he ruled.
... Besides that, he conquered Gaul (modern France) and defeated his rival Pompey in the civil war of 49-45 BC. By doing so, he managed to bring peace to Rome and also expanded Rome's provinces. Caesar proved himself as a potential leader, whom the Romans agreed after the conspirators killed him. In conclusion, it is clear that the conspirators made a wrong decision to assassinate Caesar because of the following reasons: Caesar recreated Rome, conspirators had personal motives in his assassination, he did not force the Romans to give him honours, the conspirators' failure in gaining freedom for the Romans, Caesar's position as the Chief Priest, monarchy was the best government available, the conspirators' wrong judgement in killing Caesar, and Caesar was a consummate statesman.
be better for Rome while the others just did not want him to become more powerful than
However, Caesar had the approval of many citizens in Rome, which gave him more power of Pompey. Most citizens of Rome wanted him to run the Republic instead of Pompey, therefore, they supported and even encouraged his battle against Pompey. By having more power, he was essentially more easily persuaded to cross the Rubicon with his troops. Doing so, he crossed the Rubicon and began the fight due to the power of the people. Once he crossed the Rubicon, he was hailed as a hero (Civil Wars by Julius Caesar) and was persuaded to continue fighting for power in Rome. With Caesar’s army of troops growing and the support rising, he felt he had no choice but to continue fighting for power over Pompey. However, Pompey also had supporters on his side, making the battle longer and more difficult. Obviously you can not stop a war in the middle of The civil war lasted four years and Caesar eventually won power of Rome over
people. He had a big ego and was obviously used to being in charge. When Cassius
In the years following the Persian Wars in 479 B.C., Athens had come out on top being the most dominantly powerful of any Greek city with a navy that had superior strength that increased day by day. The Athenians “ruled with heavy-handed, even brutal force as well as with reason” (Kagan 2). This was due largely to the fact that Athens had a stable and effective government, which only increased their advantage in proving themselv...
Pyrrhus became king at the age of 12 but was soon dethroned by an uprising in 302 BCE. For the next few years he served as an officer in the wars of the Diadochi. In 298 BCE, he was sent to Alexandria as a hostage under the treaty of Demetrius and Ptolemy. Pyrrhus befriended Ptolemy and then married Ptolemy’s step daughter, Antigone. In 297 BCE Ptolemy restored Pyrrhus to his kingdom. Three years later, with military and financial aid from Ptolemy, Pyrrhus went to war against his former ally Demetrius, king of Macedonia. Pyrrhus took control of the entire western half of Macedonia and Thessaly. He was driven out of Macedonia in 286 BCE when he was defeated by Lysimachus at Edessa.
To only make matters worse, Rome was slowly slipping into total anarchy. The government was becoming corrupt with bribery. The elections were being stopped, and there wasn't a consul elected in 53 or 52 B.C. Most authority was lost, the streets became rioted, and unsafe. During this time, Pompey tried to annul the Law of Ten Tribunes without notifying Caesar. If this happen, it would of removed a lot of Caesar's power. Caesar saw what he was trying to do, and stopped it before this action took place, and now knew for sure that Pompey was no longer his ally, but instead an enemy.
...ined himself from fighting back at them. Even though this is true, Odysseus is a leader and king and patience should be a key point in his personality.
The lack of war allowed the Roman Republic to stagnate and become self-indulgent. By the end of the Punic Wars, which combined these elements, Rome was sure to fail. Without a common thread uniting its society, the Roman Republic unraveled because it had nothing left holding it together. Works Cited (Plutarch, p. 269), (Holland, p. 14), (Plutarch, p. 319), (Holland, p. 33)
In “The Assassination of Julius Caesar, 44 BC ” Julius Caesar is perceived as a dictator. He pursues his political enemy, Pompey from Greece to Egypt and defeated the legions loyal to Pompey
to his young age had to rely on the advisors. The young ruler tried to