Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Poetry comparision essay
The help literary analysis
The help literary analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Practice Essay 2 #1 The article and the poem about bunting are very similar but look very different. It was tough to pick which one I liked more because they both had qualities that the other one did not have, the poem on one hand had more meaning behind each word and that a couple of words could be dissected and analyzed to have a bigger and deeper meaning they what they present. The article on the other hand is more straightforward and the words are more shallow and not as deep as the words in the poem. I liked the article better just because it has more detail and is more descriptive and that is what I prefer to read. The article and the poem were alike in multiple ways. One way the article and the poem were alike was that they both described …show more content…
a past event when their fathers taught them how to bunt. The beginning of both passages start off by describing the setting of where their fathers are teaching them to bunt.
In the article, it takes place in the backyard of the authors house while his other siblings are paying no attention to him and his father because they are doing other things, the poem takes place in what I like to picture as a rough, not in the best shape, neighborhood baseball field near Carmichael Motors. In both of these writings the authors compare the bunt to a sacrifice, the sacrifice being that the bunter is willing to sacrifice his stats and a chance to be on base to help his teammates prosper and simply take one for the team. In the article, the author compares it to brains over brawn and making the most of what you have. Both of the authors at the time in the story were young, in the article the author was 6 years old and in the poem the author doesn't exactly say how old he is but he had played three years of organized baseball, so this gives you a little clue. The author of the article is now telling this story 45 years later and the author of the poem is telling it years later as well. At the time when both of their dads were teaching the authors how to bunt, all the authors were worried about was hitting a homerun, when I was a …show more content…
little kid all I wanted to do was hit a homerun instead of getting thrown out at first for bunting. The author in the poem says that he admires what his dad is doing but he still has his eyes on the bank that served as the center field fence. In the article the author describes that swinging the baseball bat away in baseball is what is fun not bunting. The author’s dad never taught any of the authors older siblings how to hit a baseball but only bunt and the authors thought it was because they would break a house window or even hit a neighbor's house. The two different writings were alike in many ways but were also different. The two writings differed in a couple different ways.
The article on one hand is a lot more detailed and tells the reader more about the author's life and what kind of living situation the authors family has. The author doesn't come right out and say it but his family is not the wealthiest. He says that his dad had two jobs and coaches the school sports team to make a little extra money and that their aqua blue station wagon was about to die. On the other hand the poem does not go into much detail, the only way you get more detail is by dissecting the poem and pulling the information out, but even then the poem isn't as descriptive as the article. The author of the article compares his life to baseball and how him and his siblings were not long ball hitters, they lost jobs, lost their savings, lost faith and even lost their dad. The author thanks his dad because they are masters at stretching things out, getting the most from what an opportunity offers, and keeping it going with nothing more than grit in their hearts and a grip on the bat. The author of the article says “that’s what he really had us working on in the backyard.” meaning that he was teaching the author and his siblings life lessons that they will not always succeed and hit home runs, but if they get knocked down in life to stay determined and make that out count as a run in the long run. The author’s dad compares bunting to life and in the article the author says his dad was very impatient but when it came to
teaching the author and his siblings how to bunt he was very patient. This shows that the author’s father cared about his kids and wanted to teach them that life is more than just hitting home runs. I also believe it is important for the author’s dad because he spent every weekend teaching the author how to bunt and he even taught the authors older siblings in the past which shows that it also has value to the author's father. The poem the author doesn't compare it to his life directly, but the last line of the poem the author said he is getting a grip on the sacrifice meaning that he is finally starting to understand the reasoning why his father taught him how to bunt. These two simply writings had a lot of meaning behind them and I really liked the story of the article.
The poem “Moco Limping” by David Nova Monreal is about a man who has very high hopes for his dog. He wants him to be heroic and a leader but is disappointed when he doesn’t live up to those standards. He thinks his dog is clumsy and stupid. The poem “Oranges” by Gary Soto is about a boy who was walking with the girl he had a crush on down to a drugstore. He spends a nickel and an orange to buy her chocolates. These poems, “Moco Limping” and “Oranges” have different tones that the authors expressed using different word choice in the beginning of the poems, but become similar at the end.
Both poems are set in the past, and both fathers are manual labourers, which the poets admired as a child. Both poems indicate intense change in their fathers lives, that affected the poet in a drastic way. Role reversal between father and son is evident, and a change of emotion is present. These are some of the re-occurring themes in both poems. Both poems in effect deal with the loss of a loved one; whether it be physically or mentally.
Both authors use figurative language to help develop sensory details. In the poem It states, “And I sunned it with my smiles, And with soft deceitful wiles.” As the author explains how the character is feeling, the reader can create a specific image in there head based on the details that is given throughout the poem. Specifically this piece of evidence shows the narrator growing more angry and having more rage. In the short story ” it states, “We are below the river's bed. The drops of moisture trickle among bones.” From this piece of text evidence the reader can sense the cold dark emotion that is trying to be formed. Also this excerpt shows the conflict that is about to become and the revenge that is about to take place. By the story and the poem using sensory details, they both share many comparisons.
America, and the world love sport; there are hundreds of types, but the one thing that links them all together is the emotion. For players and fans alike, the emotional involvement with the game is what draws them to it; and for Americans, there is one sport in particular that ignites their passion – baseball. Baseball has been called “America’s pastime” for a reason; the suspense, drama, and pride wrapped up in this game have captivated generations. The poem, “Casey at the Bat” effectively captures the emotion tied into the sport of baseball. “Casey at the Bat” is a poem about the last inning of a Mudville baseball game. The team is down two points, and the first two of their batters had already been sent back to the dugout. However, luck seemed to be on their side, the next two batters reached base, and the best hitter on the team was up to bat; Casey. The confident-cocky Casey let the first two balls go by; both were strikes. Then the last pitch came, the crowed held their breath as Casey took a swing; and to quote the poem, “but there is no joy in Mudville -- mighty Casey has struck out.” There are two distinct psychological personalities present in this poem; these emotional beings are the audience and Casey. The actions and words of both shed light on each others personality and mental state during that final, historical inning.
Stories and poems are very different in many ways. Poems are often shorter than stories and have rhyme and meter. Stories do not have rhyme and meter and are usually much longer in length. Nevertheless a poem and a story can have many similarities. “Cherrylog Road” by James Dickey is a poem about a taboo relationship between two teenagers, while “A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings” by Gabriel García Márquez is about an “angel” that has washed up on the shore of this small town. Both “Cherrylog Road” and “A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings” have somewhat twisted theological parallels to the Bible.
The way the points of views in each different poem creates a different theme for each poems using different points diction to convey meaning for each of the two poems. In the poem “Birthday” a humorous tone shows a newborn baby in a first person point of view. As opposed to the poem “The Secret Life of Books” which uses a third person point of view for a more serious tone. The two poems would change dramatically whiteout the different points of views because without the humor of the newborn baby being the narrator the poem might take a different spin on the meaning to create a more serious tone. As opposed to “The Secret Life of Books” where the poem is a big personification which if it was not in a third person point of view it might have a a humorous tome in the background. The two poems have many things that help contrast them with each other another one of these being the theme chosen to give each poem a separate identity, while “Birthday” has some background information in some of the diction it uses to World War II “The Secret Life of Books” has no need for the knowledge of background information just the curiosity of the brain
the poem is pretty much saying that no matter what happens everything will be okay in the end because he knows he has his dad by his side and he is realizing that he can make his father Proud by doing so many good things in the world. so both poems have a nice determined and kind tone and mood both poems share that bravery and that they're not scared of anything no matter what life throws at them they look at everything the way
...ut something the mother is doing for herself, while the second poem is all about the sacrifices the father made for his son. Comparing them shows the mother to be the more "selfish" of the two, in that her child and husband are distractions from her revelry, and they are somewhat burdensome to her. But the father is totally self-sacrificing -- getting up in the "blueblack cold," making a fire with "cracked hands that ached." He takes no thought for his own comfort, except, possibly, when he gets angry. This makes me think if the father had spent some time relaxing like the mother, maybe he wouldn't have gotten as angry. Maybe thinking of yourself every once in awhile is a good thing, I don't know, but it is interesting to note the contrast. I think mother in the first poem is person we can relate to, but the father in the second poem is a person we admire.
For my poetry paper I chose to examine poetry from the family album. The family album stood out to me significantly because I thoroughly enjoyed all of the poems because I had a personal connection with it. Family has always been an important part of my life and I think this particular album speaks volume. This album has many levels to it, some deeper than others. I feel that from reading poetry, it expands our ability to think and form ideas that we would have not thought about before. Poetry gives readers the ability to make connections on a deeper level and see things from a different perspective. The two poems that spoke to me in this album specifically were “Those Winter Sundays” By Robert Hayden and “Begotten” by Andrew Hudgins. These two poems are both similar because they are from a son’s point of view, talking about their parent(s). “Those Winter Sundays” was one of my all-time favorite poems from this album because it shows a hard working father who is dedicated to his family, but does not get any recognition for his hard work.
on: April 10th 1864. He was born in 1809 and died at the age of 83 in
... overall themes, and the use of flashbacks. Both of the boys in these two poems reminisce on a past experience that they remember with their fathers. With both poems possessing strong sentimental tones, readers are shown how much of an impact a father can have on a child’s life. Clearly the two main characters experience very different past relationships with their fathers, but in the end they both come to realize the importance of having a father figure in their lives and how their experiences have impacted their futures.
Someone reading these poems might quickly jump to the conclusion that since they both use death as their theme, they are the same. However, after closer examination, they will find that the theme is actually one of the few things these two poems have in common. Robinson and Frost took one Webster’s definition, went beyond the literary meaning, and ended up with two totally different but appealing masterpieces. They are textbook examples every writer should follow when trying to approach a theme.
The former poem is to do with racial prejudice and the latter is to do
So in conclusion I think both of the poems are very interesting. Both of the poets have felt similar emotions throughout their experiences and poems. Such as anger, humiliation, unfairness and sadness. Although I like them both I prefer “In a Brixtan Markit”. I prefer this I because it is based on a real experience, and it is in a West Indian dialect which I think makes it unusual, interesting and different.
Death is important to both poems because it expresses each character’s reaction and the importance of accepting death. If you don’t you’ll be grieving and angry for a long time. Both poems tie in with each other due to this, but are different because the characters reacted differently.