Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay of playground safety
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay of playground safety
According to articles "Can a Playground Be Too Safe?" and "Tear Down the Swing Sets" lawsuits and fear of injuries led to playground design change. Design changes were meant to make playgrounds safer for the children, so that lawsuits and injuries were not a problem anymore. Playgrounds used to be more dangerous and had risky features in them that made them unsafe. Now playgrounds have evolved into safer environments but, to kids, they are boring and repetitive. In the article "Can a Playground Be Too Safe?" John Tierney claims that fear of lawsuits from children who fell on the playground is one reason that led to playground design change. The effect of this was manufactures decided to make playgrounds more secure and safe. This may lead …show more content…
Parents do not want their children playing on playgrounds that put them at risk for getting hurt. "Sometimes, of course, their mastery fails, and fall is the common form of playground injury." This shows that in the building of playgrounds, equipment ends up becoming unsafe for children. So manufacturers have to make the playgrounds even safer than before. In the subsequent article "Tear Down the Swing Sets" Nicholas Day states that all playgrounds that have been torn down in the past had a physical risk to them. Therefore, manufacturers are alternatively attempting to make creative risks. They want playgrounds to be enjoyable and interesting without risk and danger. For example, in the article, it says, "So instead of a physical risk, Rockwell talks about now making a creative risk." This shows that manufacturers believe putting a creative side will keep kids engaged on the playgrounds. A second reason that led to playground design change is that head directors of places like England's Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents wanted to impede all injury accidents that occur on playgrounds. In the article, it mentions "There's this real reluctance to get involved in anything that potentially could cause injuries." This shows that businesses don't want to take a chance on making playgrounds dangerous, so their business can
In article one, Tear Down the Swing Sets, Nicholas Day has given us reasons why playground designs have changed over time. One reason is child safety. Days research shows on lines 35, he has stated," But there's this sense that if you talk about it that's enough. There's this very real reluctance to get involved in anything that might at least potentially cause an injury." This example shows that playgrounds
Another reason that scooters shouldn't be allowed at the skatepark is that the skatepark are getting overpopulated. A lot of things get more dangerous when they are busy. For example highways, streets and especially skateparks. You always hold your kids hand when they cross the street so why would you just let them free? Skateboards are like cars flying out and could hit you.
The lack of playgrounds gave my friend and I the opportunity to create games and scenarios out of thin air. Alondra and I could be zookeepers chasing after our favorite animals or space explorers who eventually discover an alien race! Not having playgrounds forced Alondra and I to open our minds and that lead to endless possibilities of fun. Imagination has a colossal effect on a child’s mind as they grow into adults. Stimulating your imagination when you are young can lead to out of the box thinking which can benefit a child’s learning.
In conclusion, the author has given a common issue in our society, which is safety for children. Although the debate tends to replace all traditional equipment on children's playgrounds, it still causes us to think more about how to develop children in the perfect way. Do we need to keep children too safe? And this point is the success of the writer because his article is viable and very comprehensive to the intended audience, providing balance as well. By expressing the opposing ideas of two sides in the argument, the readers actually have the chance to give their own
People who say “Rockwell’s playground is still an adventure playground—a construction site with all the splintery edges sanded down. It’s what an adventure playground looks like in a risk-averse culture. And it promotes the kind of play we think children should be doing now: not with just their bodies, but with their minds. The Imagination Playground is a much more cognitive vision of the playground. No one would confuse it with a jungle gym.” (Day 2) This shows that children to Mr.Day should be using their heads more and playgrounds should be safer, but Commissioner of parks in New York Henry Stern has a different idea. He says “His philosophy seemed reactionary at the time, but today it’s shared by some researchers who question the value of safety-first playgrounds. Even if children do suffer fewer physical injuries — and the evidence for that is debatable — the critics say that these playgrounds may stunt emotional development, leaving children with anxieties and fears that are ultimately worse than a broken bone.” (Tierney 1) Showing that kids should be doing physical activities at parks and using their imagination somewhere else. Not only-but also David Ball says “There is no clear evidence that playground safety measures have lowered the average risk on playgrounds,” said David Ball, a professor of risk management at Middlesex University in London. He noted that the risk of some injuries, like long
This defense isn 't a slam dunk, however. For example, plaintiffs might be able to prove that a properly trained rider operator would have noticed the child 's small size and prevented the child from going on the ride in the first place. When riders don 't follow posted safety rules and leads to injury, the amusement park can bring this as a defense as well. For example, if a rider unlatches his seatbelt on a spinning ride and then is thrown from the car, a court is unlikely to find the park negligent. In my personal opinion this cannot be used as defense by Knott’s Berry amusement park as non-compliance was not
Play is the engagement in activity for enjoyment and recreation rather than a serious or particular purpose. Children are playing constantly, but to what point does being safe alter the stimulating and the overall enjoyment of play. In the 21st century adolescents have been less subjective ti risky play in western society due to parents becoming more protective over the safety of their children. It is important for parents and child care givers to understand the different categories of risky play and why adolescent children should partake in risky play to an extent. Ellen Beate Hansen Sandseter explores the idea on how to categorize different types of risky play in her article, Categorizing risky play- how can we identify risk-taking in children
Parrish, A. M., Yeatman, H., Iverson, D., & Russell, K. (2012). Using interviews and peer pairs to better understand how school environments affect young children's playground physical activity levels: a qualitative study. Health Educ Res, 27(2), 269-280. doi: 10.1093/her/cyr049
In modern Western countries, adults take the responsibility of managing children’ behaviours, activities and the environment as protecting children from significant injuries. Also, parents are likely to pay more attention to protect their children from external injuries such as traffic accidents, stranger’s dangerous, personal accidents and other factors (Wyver et al., 2010, p.264). Under these kinds of protections, children lose many opportunities for free play and lead to the increase of childhood obesity as well as inactivity health issues (Wyver et al., 2010, p. 263). Beside the protection from parents, the features in the childhood environment are less risky for children to play with. For example, some Western countries such as the United Kingdom uses the rubber playground to reduce the rates of children injuries (Wyver et al., 2010, p. 265). The surplus safety from both parents and environment minimises children’s chances and experiences of encountering risks. In some way, the surplus safety infringes children’s right of play and silences their voices on their lives. Wyver et al. (2010, p. 263) argue that the surplus safety is negative to children from both legitimate anger and child development anger. Surplus safety may not substantially build the child-friendly
... in the toy industry is to make toy safety the number one priority and to fulfill the customers’ needs.
If a town has a skatepark that is built in the right spot and is also built correctly it could improve the looks of the town. Improving the looks of the town will attract people and skaters from everywhere. In order for this to happen the park has to be designed and built professionally. A few rails and ramps that are placed on the outskirts of the town are not going to improve the looks of anything. But, if a nice park is built in a busy, populated area where there are lots of people it will looks great.Not only do skateparks look good, but if it designed and constructed correctly, they are fiscally conservative and require little maintenance(Whitly). After they are built they practically last forever.
The Play Strategy for Scotland is a national initiative that is very much relevant to my topic. The main aim is to create the best place for children to grow up in Scotland. It also aims to achieve making children able to play safely in their environment. The initiative links to my topic as it identifies the importance of play being a life-enhancing daily experience and its contribution to a happy, healthy childhood. The Play Strategy also protects children’s ability to play. (The Scottish Government, 2013)
The indoor environment-first and foremost the indoor environment needs to be safe, and it needs to be all inclusive. This means that every child, no matter their age race, ethnicity, gender or abilities or special education needs, can all play. When considering the layout of the indoor area it needs to be spacious and it needs to accommodate children continuous change of interests and abilities so that children are able to grow and learn. If the indoor environment stayed the same each day, children would not be stimulated, they would get bored and they would not develop their learning. Furthermore, the environment needs to be of the highest quality, the toys need to be safe, and good enough to situmulate the childs brain. these toys need to
There are some ways Disney can change or add things to their safety features. One way they could change it would be to add sensors on the belt during the whole ride. Normally, the sensor are used just to tell when the belt is buckled in, not when it disconnects. The sensor would inform a cast member that the belt disconnected, and the cast member could safely and efficiently stall the ride to fix the problem. Another major change would be to add grate-like material to the tops and bottoms of all carts. The normal steel “cage” constricted the air flow and could potentially damage the exterior and major components to the safety of the ride. The final fall, at the moment, is pretty jerky. The final major change would be to add magnetic brakes instead of mechanical. This would allow for a softer final