More handpicked essays just for you.
Native american history and european settlers
Essay on native american history
Essay on native american history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
I. Introduction A. Attention Getter: Imagine the Minnesota Vikings were called the Minnesota Black skins. How would you feel about that? B. The Washington Redskins need to change their name, and they need to do it now. C. Sub points: Native American history, why they need to change their name, and actions taken to remove their name. II. Body A. Native American history 1. The word “Redskin” refers to the color of the native’s skin. (Kessler NP). 2. For every male above 12 years old that was taken by the white men was worth 50 Pounds (Phips 2). 3. For every female and male under the age of 12 taken, or any scalp or evidence that was presented of an Indian that was killed was worth 20 pounds (2). B. Why they need to change the name 1. …show more content…
At the University of Southern California a professor researched the effects on native American mascots on teens and concluded that Native American students have lower Self-esteem (Anastasia NP).
2. A survey conducted by the Center for Indigenous Studies at California State University, asked 400 Native Americans if they found the name offending. They concluded with 67% of the Native Americans saying yes (Steele NP). 3. In the dictionary, it is defined as slang and a racial slur to Native Americans (Rhodan NP). 4.”Redskins is a derogatory term and that a group of people shouldn’t be used as a Mascot” (Anastasia NP). 5. “It’s is the worst name we can be called in the English language”, says Suzan Shawn Harjo who is a Native American (“what’s in a” NP). 6. Native American groups and lawmakers say it’s offensive and racist (Potenza NP). 7. The U.S Patent and trademark office say “this racial designation based on skin color is Disparaging to native Americans” (NP) 8.”Eliminating Indian team names will help erase ethnic stereotypes, making it easier for Americans to see Indians as individuals” (Worshop NP). 9. “To the fan we only exist in the 1800s as a warrior culture”, says Cynthia Colonelly. (Anastasia …show more content…
NP). C. Actions taken to remove the name 1. 10 members of congress sent a letter to Dan Snyder. (Berman NP). 2. “Native Americans throughout the country consider the term ‘redskin’ a racial, derogatory slur akin to the the n-word among African Americans or the w- word among Latinos”, wrote the lawmakers in the letter they sent to Dan Snyder.
(NP). 3. The congressmen also said the NFL will never have diversity if they continue to use the racial slur of redskins (Berman NP). 4. An Oneida Indian nation sent 2,500 NFL players letters (“Native Americans Appeal” NP). 5. President Obama asked for the nickname to be released (Armour NP). 6. Tom wheeler (FCC Official) expresses that he doesn’t use the term because he believes it is offensive (Rhodan NP). 7. Instead of using the term ‘redskin’ the Washington city newspapers boycott the term and refer to them as the pigskins (Berman NP). 8. “I think it’s insensitive and I think that there’s no reason for it to continue as the name for a team in our capitol”, say Hilary Clinton (Kedmey NP). 9. American Indian sports mascots have gone to 3,000 to 900 as of 2014, according to the morning star institute (Potenza NP). 10. The NCAA asked 19 universities to change their name or get permission from all the local tribes, most agreed (NP) 11. The Arkansas State University Indians became the Red Wolves (NP) 12. In Cooperstown, NY Cooperstown High School went from the Redskins to the
Hawkeyes III Conclusion A. The Washington Redskins name is offensive to Native Americans B. The Redskins need to change their name.
In a generation focused on social justice and the elimination of prejudice from our society, there is still a use of offensive language and terminology in the area of professional sports. In “The Indian Wars” by S. L. Price, Price attempts to make the reader aware of sports teams that use derogatory terms as their team name and their mascot. He does this by highlighting football, and trying to determine whether Native-Americans are offended by team names in sports, or more specifically, the Redskins. Price’s essay is ineffective because although he raises good points, he doesn’t help the reader to form an opinion by adding historical context to the derogatory names used. He also uses inaccurate poll results to make assumptions about the feelings
Naylor implies that derogatory terms have a twist and are a disguise of acknowledgement to her race. Although it was initially created to humiliate and dehumanize African Americans, ‘the n-word’ develops into a word that admires men of that race.
The debate is divided into two sides. Those opposed to the use of Redskins and all Native American names in sports, and perceive the use of such terms and imagery as racist and derogatory towards Native Americans and those for keeping the name who cite the history of the team, its links to Native American players and coaches who were part of the team when it was create...
Teams in every sport, at every level of competition, have a mascot. It is the mascot that represents the competitive spirit and team identity, motivating players and fans alike. Does the symbol chosen have any impact on whether a team wins or loses? Unlikely. But the choice of a Native American mascot continues to ignite debate and controversy among athletes, fans and alumni, as well as those people who might otherwise be disinterested in sports. Utilizing an Indian mascot is nothing more than a veiled attempt at hate speech.
...ers' evolution from mother and student into a leading voice against the merchandising of Native American sacred symbols -- and shows the lengths to which fans will go to preserve their mascots." In keeping all the Native American Mascots in schools, colleges, and professional sports teams we are showing a lack of respect. The Native Americans have voiced the lack of honor these names are bringing to them. "The fact that history has ignored the incredible pain we have inflicted on Native Americans does not now give us the right to ignore their largely muted call." Americans need to take a step back think about how they would feel if there ritual and or sacred tradition was misused. "We feel that we are being put in a position of sacrificing our dignity and pride and will never be treated as equals in white society as long as the use of Indian symbols continues."
The opposition states that it would be considered racist to call a team the blacks, but they can have a team called the Redskins. The arguments for the opposition are thin, but bring up valid points.
Fighting the use of the word ‘redskins’” by Brian Cladoosby says how “[s]tudies show the use of American Indian-based names, mascots and logos in sports has a negative psychological effect on Native peoples” Cladoosby places a link to Dr. Michael A. Friedman research report which backs his case. In his study Dr. Friedman, a clinical psychologist says how Redskins is “uniquely destructive” because it “perpetuates the stereotypical and outdated caricature” and “promotes and justifies the use of a dictionary-defined racial slur, thus increasing risk for discriminatory”. With the rate of Native American suicide one of the highest in the nation the addition of their culture and history being stereotyped young Natives are facing discrimination and then being told that it’s okay because it’s for a sport. Cladoosby adds how that it creates a challenge to Natives who want to “maintain a foundation in their culture and language” meaning that ignoring a name that was once used when hunting their ancestors means that they are ignoring their culture. The name is not just racist and derogatory but promotes the an old-fashioned and stereotypical view of Native
Recently, the use of controversial words has become a heavily debated topic, as seemingly truthful statements to some, cause insult to others. The Times article "Why 'Redskins' Is a Bad Word", by acclaimed linguist and professor John McWhorter, was published in 2015, around when the use of the word "Redskins" was being debated in Californian public schools through Bill AB-30 (2015). In the article, McWhorter aims to clarify the condemnation of the word "Redskins" (McWhorter,2015, para. 1), by suggesting the offence does not stem from the literal definition of such words, but instead the negative and often derogatory connotations the words have. McWhorter begins by introducing the recent discussions surrounding the use of the word "Redskins" (McWhorter,2015, para. 1). He informs readers of the emotions attached to controversial words in the examples and describes how words continue to evolve as time goes on. Alongside his reputation as a credible person, a quote from a distinguished professor, and anecdotal story, McWhorter provokes an emotional connection with the readers
Putting Indians on a helmet shows how America “owns” them. “Not only do Indians have to deal with the fallout of being ‘conquered’ people...the shame of being men who descended from those unable to protect our women...the shame of being women who descended from those raped and tortured…” but they also have to deal with being reminded of the events that happened in the past. Constantly being reminded of these events is disrespectful and torture. In the past, the Indians were helpless against the pilgrims and were unable to do anything to protect their people. Since the name of the mascot is broadcasted visually, Redskins just reminds them that they were owned and still remain to be. Just like corporate America copyrighting their inventions, in Dan Snyder’s position in his letter to the Washington Redskins fans, he continues to want to “own” the name Redskins. Snyder’s action of keeping the team name shows his power of “sustain[ing] long term success if this franchise.” American Indians are being disrespected in this manner by being seen as a franchise instead of a group of people. Especially since such a big issue like this is just for a sports game, it is demeaning for American Indian’s
Team mascots that depict a certain type of group is wrong and should be changed. It is degrading and hurtful to far too many people to keep them from staying the same. Native Americans or any other race or ethnicity should not be stereotyped in a way that degrades them in any way. All teams that have mascots that are named after a certain race or ethnicity should be changed.
Exploiting the Native American culture should not be use to portray a sport team, using their culture mascot represents a false perception about the culture, damage their virtue and causes racial discrimination. Using mascots leads to misconception of Native Americans and it damages the youth mentality. It also ridicules their culture that sport fans can devise. Native American mascots are ignorant and a shame to their society. Today many Native Americans are battling against the disturbing image of Chief Wahoo and all the distorted images that these mascots set up about them. The use of Indian mascots and symbols should come to an end because it is vulgar and is not considerate to the Native people and their society.
Times have changed - what was acceptable 30 years ago may not hold up in today’s world. Racially offensive mascots have created division - not unity. If teams like the Indians, Braves and Redskins were to change their names and update their branding, they could potentially benefit more than by holding on to offensive, outdated traditions. Why would a professional sports organization settle for fewer fans, less revenue, and an image that offends its own citizens? By...
Many races are unjustly victimized, but Native American cultures are more misunderstood and degraded than any other race. College and high school mascots sometimes depict images of Native Americans and have names loosely based on Native American descent, but these are often not based on actual Native American history, so instead of honoring Native Americans, they are being ridiculed. According to the article Warriors Survive Attack, by Cathy Murillo (2009) some “members of the Carpentaria community defended Native American mascot icons as honoring Chumash tradition and the spirit of American Indian Warriors in U.S. history and others claimed that the images were racist stereotypes” (Murillo, 2009). If people do not attempt to understand and respect Native American culture, then Native American stereotypes will become irreparable, discrimination will remain unresolved, and ethnocentrism will not be reprimanded.
Today in America the word Racism is taken to a whole new level. Even in sports, such as the NFL racism prospers. For instance the Washington Redskins of the National Football League. Native Americans are trying to say the NFL is being rude for naming a Team Redskins. The Redskins have had that name since 1933 (Staff). The team had the name of Braves before they adopted the name Redskins. It was changed due to racism purposes. Some people would agree that the whole situation with Redskins is ridiculous because The Major League Baseball series has two teams related to Native Americans, The Atlanta Braves and The Cleveland Indians. The NFL also has more than just Redskins. They have the Kansas City Chiefs. So if they are really worried about total racism why isn’t the Chiefs in on this conversation?
Contrary to popular belief, discrimination of Native Americans in America still widely exist in the 21st century! So you may ask, why? Well, to answer that one question, I will give you 3 of the countless reasons why this unfortunate group of people are punished so harshly for little good reason. So now, let’s get into it, shall we!