Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Debates over free speech and hate speech
Problems with freedom of speech
Freedom of speech vs. hate speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Debates over free speech and hate speech
Xe, xem, xyr, xey; what comes to mind when you think of these words? Are these words anything more than gibberish, or are you able to form the mental picture of an individual who uses these words as pronouns? Regardless of your own answer there are many that can’t manifest such images in regards to their ‘comrades’. (careful not to use labels such as countryman or woman.) Not what if I told you that if you didn’t force yourself and retrain your brain to use these words you would be in violation of the law? It’s unbelievable isn’t it? Unfortunately truth can be stranger than fiction. If you improperly label someone using “archaic” pronouns in Canada you are committing a criminal offense, and we’re not just talking about a traffic ticket; this …show more content…
I mean, look at the conversation we’re having right now, (In reference to the rather brash interrogation he received from Cathy Newman.) You’re certainly willing to risk offending me in the pursuit of truth. Why should you have the right to do that? It’s been rather uncomfortable... You’re doing what you should do, which is digging a bit to see what the hell is going on. And that is what you should do. But you’re exercising your freedom of speech to certainly risk offending me, and that’s fine. More power to you, as far as I’m concerned.” In saying this he rightly put that there can be no double standards, and there can be no avenue which we do not explore as a means to reach a compromise that will help mend our relationship with our fellow country-man, it’s because of this and the dire consequences should we not mend the gap forming between the populace of western civilizations as a whole that makes any such proposal to censor free speech unacceptable. To finish I’ll say this, it is your right to be offended, but it is not your right to deplatform anyone who you deem to be
Individuals’ right to keep and bear arms in self-defense should be further restricted. For example, George Zimmermann – neighborhood watch citizen responsible for the teenager Treyvon Martin’s death
Though, his motivation comes from exploring a topic that is quite controversial. He wants people to know that there are consequences for saying hurtful and offensive things and claiming that they have a right to do so because of the First Amendment. Using the First Amendment to excuse bad behavior is not acceptable. This is where we see harassment online because websites are rarely regulated to be sure that every user is saying things that don’t affect others. As Sanneh paraphrases what one book he references, “. . .the First Amendment is powerless to protect.” Sanneh also provides other examples of how people are harassed online, such as a story of a journalist, Lindy West, who gets called obscene things like “a fat bitch”. It’s hard to control what can be said online, which is why many people think it’s okay to say whatever they want. Most probably think it’s okay simply because they are a nobody online, and their words won’t affect anyone because it’s not directed towards
freedom of speech for two main reasons: a) he finds it abhorrent that the state
People think they can tell you what you can and can't do! People think we should not step out of a certain boundaries. that we all need to walk in a straight line. They say don't stray from your path. This is not 1915 anymore this is 2015 we have developed over time. Nowadays almost everyone cusses. people wear clothes our grandparents would be ashamed of. They go out in go to clubs and dance inappropriate, women sell there bodys.people are diffrent they are not shy, It's a new world so why censor things.
The people who question censorship and the use of censorship are known as the people who are against or anti-censorship. People who are anti-censorship believes that nothing should be hidden, and that everything should be open to the public. Gavin Mcinnes is a 45-year-old (2016) who is a writer, an actor, and comedian. Gavin Mcinnes had written an article which was taken down because it “has been reported by the community as hateful or abusive content” (Brown 1). The people who read Mcinnes article didn’t have to read or continue reading it when they became displeased with Mcinnes’s view. Those people did not have to read it if they did not like it. “The publication can choose what to publish… no matter how much outrage that content provokes”
Unlike many other countries America has freedom of speech. Even in other countries in Europe people are not allowed to use “hate speech” and they can be sent to prison for it. Fortunately, the American constitution defends people’s freedom of speech, no matter how controversial it is. Political correctness diminishes people’s free speech. It may not be direct but even indirectly the knowledge that someone might have adverse consequences; such as losing a job as a result of their speech is unacceptable. People have the right to state their opinions without others infringing on them, it was the principle in which America was founded. The first amendment of the constitution of the United States declares that: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” (US Const. amend. I, sec. i). While the first amendment only affects congress’s control over free speech, it indicates that free speech is a right that people must have. Some people are of the opinion that if something can be found offensive
However, Bok argues that when the times come to decide what is more important, a mutual respect for each other or free speech, the Supreme Court had made it clear that it stands on the side of free speech (Bok, 67). Bok states that he agrees that those who have decided to behave in an tasteless fashion to be self serving and unthinking of the society as a whole. However, Bok then states that just because an individual disapproves an action that express hate or racism, it doesn't give the individual who disapproves any right to ban that action (Bok, 2). Bok furthers argue that because these rules are made to protect the minorities, it is not fair to those who the rules does not extend its coverage to. (Bok, 2) The most important point made by both Hitchens and Bok was if we were to put a censor in place, who is to decide what or what cant be said? There isn’t anyone in the world who would be qualified to decide for an entire country what is considered hate speech or what is not considered hate speech. The simple reason being no matter who the person is, he or she would always have some sort of bias against someone because of his/her race, religion, work or previous dislike for any individuals. With this bias in place, no one would be able to fully take on the responsibility of being a fair censor.
"What is at stake here it the right to read and be exposed to controversial, thoughts and language. The most effective antidote to the poison of mindless orthodoxy is ready access to a broad sweep of ideas and philosophies. There is no danger in such exposure. The danger is mind control especially when that control is exercised by a few over the majority" (qtd. in Hunt
Do these United States have an obligation to remain loyal an empire so disadvantageous, detrimental, and ruinous as the English crown? Can a people so just in temperament, so religious in character, and so manifestly destined for great and noble deeds be for any length of time so suppressed and hindered by a faraway entity as it has been under the rule of an illegitimate imperial master? Can any earthly authority rightfully deprive a man of his natural and divine rights, without also delegitimizing its own self, as well as bringing peril upon the God-given rights of all other men? Can the English crown be allowed to continue to extort and enslave the pious and prayerful population of this great continent without repercussion? To each and every one of these questions, we must answer, most emphatically, most clearly, most decisively, in the negative!
It was October 6, 1998 when he was lured from the bar that cold, fateful night. His skull was smashed with a pistol butt as he was lashed to a fence, left for dead in near freezing temperatures. Nearly eighteen hours later he was found by passersby and taken to a hospital where he remained in a coma for several days until slowly slipping away. At his funeral, picketers carried signs saying, "God Hates Fags" and "Fags Deserve to Die."
The U.S. is in a tough spot and has been since 9/11. Although, from the Presidents to fighting off our enemies, we still stand. Florida nightclub shooting has been another big one since 9/11. The Florida attack was topped U.S. mass shooting to ever happen since 9/11. The terrorist took 49 lives and injured 50 people. That night, the U.S. stood in silence and gathered with families and still held the flag high. Even after that night, we still held our ground. People doubt the U.S. and say that we do not stand up for our own anymore when we do. Not only do we stand with our own country, we stand with others. When Paris had their first big attack in November of 2015, we helped them by sending them our gratitude, our troops, and support. We do
Many of you think that we have privacy on our lives. Its sad that we think that because of the laws that have been repeated to us about our privacy. The big news is that we are being watched and listened to everything that we do and say. This are the main things that have been happening, the privacy of the people, Edward Snowden leaked important documents, and a way that we can fix this problem.
Racism is the worst thing to ever happen to the world because it affects everyone in the process and it causes people to go crazy because they think they are superior or justify their actions and it also causes people to do bad things based on the opinion that they are to be held at a higher place in society based on the color of their skin. People like Hitler and others who have done atrocious things in the past or future need to be severely punished for their actions and grief they have or will cause instead of being protected once they are caught. If you were arrested for committing a huge hate crime you would be put into isolation or just be put away from the other prisoners so they won't kill you or beat you up for your protection. This should not happen, you should be treated the same as the other prisoners and after being put to death after your trial is over. If the crime you committed was a hate crime and left many people injured or dead you should then be punished by death because of the trauma you just caused and the loss of someone else’s
Summer has come to an end and school back in full swing. One is ready to crush the challenges facing a 5th grader. The last bell for recess sounds. Young boys race outside to enjoy the sun’s warmth. Name calling and horse-playing around immediately begins as they plan their weekend fun. Challenging each other to execute silly acts or daring one another to flirt with the girls across the playground. One yells out if you don’t jump from the top you are a sissy. Then one hears ask Julie out first. Recess is almost over when another one yells out he won’t…he’s a gay sissy. Silence has now blanketed the playground and one could hear a pin drop. Saved by the bell it was time to line up and head back to class. The final bell of the day
You go to school every one there has to watch what they say because the worlds once freedom of speech has be censored so now when you would go gather your friends and gossip you now have to watch what you would gossip about . do you think that is fair who side are you on the freedom of speech where you can say what you would like or the side where you agreed with the censoring of the worlds speech . that is up to you but here is my choice to stand up and be the free person that my soldiers fought for today.