Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Hate crime laws essay
Effectiveness of hate crime laws
The effects of racism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Racism is the worst thing to ever happen to the world because it affects everyone in the process and it causes people to go crazy because they think they are superior or justify their actions and it also causes people to do bad things based on the opinion that they are to be held at a higher place in society based on the color of their skin. People like Hitler and others who have done atrocious things in the past or future need to be severely punished for their actions and grief they have or will cause instead of being protected once they are caught. If you were arrested for committing a huge hate crime you would be put into isolation or just be put away from the other prisoners so they won't kill you or beat you up for your protection. This should not happen, you should be treated the same as the other prisoners and after being put to death after your trial is over. If the crime you committed was a hate crime and left many people injured or dead you should then be punished by death because of the trauma you just caused and the loss of someone else’s …show more content…
They leave innocent people dead or injured just based on the opinion that they are “less” of a person in the eyes of the people who committed the crime meaning that the death is less significant because the person is “not human”. These crimes should not be treated as regular crimes and should be held higher and stricter than regular ones. Hate crimes are not just against race, they also happen because of a person’s sex, sexual orientation, disability and even religion. Hate crimes against Muslims have risen to surpass the 2001 level when 9/11 happened. These occurrences have been happening a lot in the 21st century. The first topic is where a group of white teens ran over and beat up an innocent black man just because of his skin
Individuals’ right to keep and bear arms in self-defense should be further restricted. For example, George Zimmermann – neighborhood watch citizen responsible for the teenager Treyvon Martin’s death
Racial discrimination has been an immense problem in our society for a very long time. The fact that the race of a victim plays a role in his or her sentencing is appalling. Discrimination within our society needs to come to an end. It’s frightening to think that if you are a minority facing a capital punishment case, which you might be found guilty only because of the color of your skin.
Again, the actual crime should be punished not the reasoning behind it. Murder is murder, robbery is robbery, rape is rape, regardless of motive. For example, Person A and Person B both assault innocent people. But while beating the life out of his victim, Person B calls him a "Nigger." His crime is considered a hate crime. Consequently, his crime will receive harsher punishment. Despite why the crime took place, the point is that a crime took place. No matter why the victim is chosen, he or she was still harmed, the family is still going to grieve, and someone must be punished. Whether a person is killed for money or drugs or out of hate or prejudice, the fact still remains that he or she has been killed. With hate crime laws, the hate is being looked at, more so than the crime itself. Even though hate is a terrible thing to have in your heart, all Americans have the right to hate whatever or who ever they want. Besides, if officials start punishing hate or unholy thoughts, they might as well make a new category of crime— thought crime. If this line of thinking were acted upon, then half of America would be behind bars.
Hate crimes are done too frequently in the United States. Although we have laws that supposedly regulate them, many people still feel the need to commit acts of violence on people that are different than them. Many of these crimes originate with some sort of hate speech. People get ideas from other people, passed down from previous generations.
When the topic of hate and bias crime legislation is brought up two justifications commonly come to mind. In her article entitled “Why Liberals Should Hate ‘Hate Crime Legislation” author Heidi M. Hurd discusses the courts and states views that those who commit hate and bias crimes ought to be more severely punished. She takes into consideration both sides of the argument to determine the validity of each but ultimately ends the article in hopes to have persuaded the reader into understanding and agreeing with her view that laws concerning the punishment of hate and bias laws should not be codified. Hate crime is described as a violent, prejudice crime that occurs when a victim is targeted because of their membership in a specific group. The types of crime can vary from physical assault, vandalism, harassment or hate speech. Throughout the article Hurd tried to defend her view and explain why there should be no difference of punishment for similar crimes no matter the reason behind it. Her reason behind her article came from the law that President Obama signed in 2009 declaring that crimes committed with hatred or prejudice should have more sever punishments. While the court has their own views to justify their reasoning behind such decisions, in the article Hurd brings up points and facts to prove the wrongfulness of creating such a law. However, though Hurd has made her views clear in the following essay I will discuss reasons why the penalties are justifiable, why they should receive the same degree of punishment, less punishment and my personal view on the topic.
With the increase in hate crimes in America, minority groups are starting to become the prey of the beasts who commit these awful crimes. So the minority groups (Asians, African Americans, Jewish people, Homosexuals, and others) have been pushing to have hate crime laws passed to protect them from violence and ridicule. The laws that are in affect now are only slightly protective of the minorities in hate crimes. The laws that are in state right now say that a hate crime offender can only be prosocuted for their crimes if they are prohibiting the minority or victum of the hate crime from a “federally protected right”. Such as attending school, voting and etc. The victums of hate crimes do not think that these laws are very strict. The victoms are demanding newer stricter laws. The victoms or minorities want these newer stricter laws because basically they have no protection from violence. The old laws basically just state that if you are prohibiting the person from doing something you are at fault. Well the minorities want these stiffened and they want them to be harsher. An example of what the minorities want is any act done against anyone with intent to cause bodily harm or death because the person was part of a minority group will carry the fine of being federally prosecuted and with that there is the chance of the death penalty.
Living in the twenty first century Americans would like to believe that they are living in the land of the free, where anyone and everyone can live an ordinary life without worrying that they will be arrested on the spot for doing absolutely nothing. The sad truth, with the evidence to prove it, is that this American Dream is not all that it appears to be. It has been corrupted and continues to be everyday by the racism that is in the criminal justice system of America. Racism has perpetuated the corruption of the criminal justice system from aspect of the initial stop, the sentencing in court, all the way to the life of an inmate in the prison. There seems to be nothing stopping it as it continues to grow
During the 1930’s the greatest form of racism took place against the Jew’s. A quote from Adolf Hitler, “I have in the course of my political struggle won much love from my people, but when I crossed the former frontier (into Austria) there met me such a stream of love as I have never experienced. Not as tyrants, but as liberators.” (qtd. Wiestenthal.org). This quote shows how people have different views on racism. Adolf Hitler describes how he was welcomed into a country while other struggled to end the genocide that he had started. Racists have the view, if people don’t belong, or are different then they are, they should not be allowed to participate or live in the same areas or even to live at all. Herman Goering was quoted in 1938 saying, “Kick out the Jews from the economy and turn them into debtors.” (qtd. Wiestenthal.org). Hitler’s followers began to do this before the Jews were sent to the concentration camps.
There are both state and federal laws that prohibit hate crimes, but proving an assailant committed a crime in prejudice is very difficult. Any type of crime can call for some form of punishment, from fines and short prison stays for misdemeanors to long term imprisonment for felonies. Once it has been reviled that an accused willfully committed an offense, proof must be given that indicates the crime was influenced by prejudice against a specific characteristic in order to show that it was also a hate crime. When this can be proven, the harshness of the crime automatically increases. People often wonder why hate crime punishment is harsher than for crimes that are not motivated by any type of bias. The basic reason for this is that most crimes are directed at an individual, but hate crimes are against an entire community. A burglar who breaks into a random home does so for personal gain, and usually doesn’t even know who lives in the home they are invading. Conversely, a person who chooses a victim based on a particular bias is singling out a ch...
Although proponents of hate crimes have some valid points I still remain in disagreement because when it comes to hate crimes their seems to be more questions then answers and there also seems to be a lot of uncertainty within the law itself. Hate crime laws should no longer exist in are justice system because every violent crime involves an element of hate and it is impossible to prove a person’s motive or hate in the court of law.
“A guy sends you a friend request. You don’t know him, but he’s got a cute profile picture, so you accept his friend request. It’s your baby girl’s first day of school. She looks SO cute in her new outfit you just have to take a picture and put it on Facebook so all your friends and family can see. You’re so excited dropping her off that you ‘Check in’ to her school on Facebook. Meanwhile, the mystery guy whose friend request you hurriedly accepted earlier this morning is saving that picture you posted of your daughter in her cute new outfit to his phone and texting it to 60 other grown men across the world with the caption –‘American Female, Age 5, Brown Hair, Black Eye, $5,000. Not only did you provide a picture of your little girl to a
Hate crime is still being committed today and many believe that it would benefit victims and communities if hate crimes were punished more severely. However, hate crimes should not be punished more severely than other crimes that are motivated for other reasons; although the motivation (personal belief) and violence that constitute a hate crime are horrendous, criminals should be prosecuted for their wrongdoing, not for their beliefs. The idea that criminals should be punished more severely than crimes that are motivated by greed, anger, revenge is not acceptable. The potential motivations that were just given can constitute several crimes, like, murder. The issue (which, in my opinion, makes a good argument) is that it ‘’creates complicated moral problems by making it appear as if a murder is "worse" when committed because of the victim's race, religion, or sexual orientation.’’ (Hate crime laws, 2014) Murder is one the worst crimes that can be committed and it can have several motives and reasons behind it. Allowing hate crimes to be punished more severely or stating that hate crime is more ‘’aggressive’’ and ‘’brutal’’ is not fair to other victims and treats them
In a survey that was conducted by me at work out of 30 coworkers 18 were the victims of some form of identity theft.
Domestic violence is an issue that has affected many people regardless of age, race, or gender. The seriousness of it can vary dramatically. Domestic violence is the intentional intent to physically and/or sexually assault, batter, or has abusive tendencies against a sibling, parent, child (ren), or domestic partner. The overwhelming emotional, psychological, and physical ramifications of domestic violence can cross generations and last a lifetime. Bringing an end to abuse is not a matter of the victim choosing to leave; but the victim being able to evade their abuser safely. Establishing, I Choose Life Organization, gives those victims a safe haven to get back that confidence and self-respect that they lost due to their abuser.
Hitler and racists alike both carry an overwhelming sense of hatred and cruelty towards many people whom they do not even know. A specific event of racism in relation to the Nazi era was the Charleston hate crime on June 29, 2015. Blaring in headlines all over, “The world is in mourning after the horrific murder of nine innocent people in Charleston (“Nine Killed in Charleston Hate Crime” 1).” Similar to Hitler, out of hatred and intolerance, this man thought he was superior to another race, and carried out unforgivable actions. This event shocked the world. Racism is an idea many people know of, but many never expect such a tragedy to occur. Another shocking similarity between the two intolerants was that many people had difficulty understanding the racism underlying. Most followed along blindly, not knowing what they were getting themselves into. Many Germans, Jews, and people around the world alike were in blatant shock that someone would do something so cruel. Many had no clue how to react. In today’s society, people still do not know how to react. We see stuff like this happen constantly, but no one really understands what to do or say. Examples such as this show how far we as a society still need to come in order to overcome