Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
1000 words on the witch trials
Witch trial puritan
Primary sources witch trials
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: 1000 words on the witch trials
To all the gentleman of the jury, I’m here to defend Martha, the person who were accused for some unreasonable that have no witnesses but the victim. Therefore, I want to proof to you guys that Martha is innocent, and she does not participate in any of witchcraft. All of the accusation to Martha can be divided in three categories: for afflicting people, kill people’s cattle, and participate in witch-meeting at Salem Village. First I will talk about afflicting people. Some people were saying that Martha afflicted people for dead, which doesn’t make any sense and that is not a good reason to accuse someone because you can’t afflict someone without touching them, or give them stuff that can cause ailment or disease. Also, they didn’t give any
evidence, or witnesses that were afflicted. In Benjamin Abbot case, he said that Martha was very angry with him and that she would stick as close to Abbot as the bark stuck to the tree, and these words were heard by others beside him. But then no name were mentioned, it ended up with “other people”. These showed that their reason to accuse Martha were somewhat not true. The second categories that people were accusing her was about their cattle. They were saying that after having difference with Martha, their cattle started to die for no natural reason. What’s is the “natural reason” that they mean? Their cattle weren’t suppose to die at a certain time, nor they knew what happened to their cattle. They just know that their cattle die. So in that period of time there could’ve been a disease that spread around to cattles, because none of them actually observe the cattles, so they can’t say that their cattle die for no natural reason. About those people accused her for participate in the witch-meeting at the Salem Village. Why didn’t they get punished for also being in witchcraft? By what evidence that you believe what they saying is true? It’s just like someone told you that they saw you at a place that you’ve never been to. In conclusion, dear all judges, I want to say that Martha is innocent. All of the reason that people accused her are not true, and they doesn’t have witnesses or proof for it.
Your honor before we start I would just like to inform you that I am very happy that during this case you will you logic and evidence to decide the fate of my client Martha Carrier. In this case I will be defending Martha Carrier against the charge of witchcraft. One of the main allegations that has been presented by the prosecutor is that the defendant killed the cows of several villagers. The accusers of this crime are Mr. Abbot, Mr.Toothaker, Mr. Rogger, Mr.Preston. They all state that after some confrontation with the defendant their cow or in some instances several cows died from no seeable natural causes. Now blaming this on witchcraft when there are other plausible reasons is ridiculous it is possible that the cows caught a disease as this would show no outward sign other than possibly
The focus of Miller’s The Crucible is an appalling witch trial that morfs the once-peaceful town of Salem into a cutthroat slaughterhouse. As a lucrative playwright and a not-so-subtle allegory author, Miller is a seasoned wordsmith who addresses people akin to himself, and is not secretive about that information. The Crucible best serves its purpose as a learning device and a social statement, especially at the time of its publishing. Miller‘s piece showcases the appeals in an easy-to-identify manner that is perfect for middle or high school students who are new to the appeals, or for English majors who have no problem pinpointing them, making this play ideal for a classroom setting.
The Salem witch trials of 1692 were one of the bloodiest witch-hunts in America colonial history. The event started in the house of the new minister of Salem, Samuel Parris, when his daughter, Betty, suffered from mysterious symptoms, and later she accused her slave, Tibuta, for using witchcraft on her. Later, two other women, Sarah Goode and Sarah Osborne, were accused of using witchcraft on other girls; right after the accusations, they were arrested (Lecture 9/13/2016). As a result, the hunt of witches began which led to hundreds of arrests, and nineteen accused were hanged (Text 190). Although three hundred years have passed, the true cause of the episode remains a mystery. Many scholars have conducted numerous studies of the trails, however,
The evidence presented against the supposed witches during the Salem Witch Trials was not physical evidence. Most of the testimonies given by the townspeople were random happenstances that were told to make the accused seem guilty. Other types of evidence given were statements about the accusers being bitten and pinched; this apparently classified as bewitching someone. Some of the accused claimed to be conspiring with the devil so they would not be executed and instead be put in prison (Godbeer 143). Many years later statements given by testifiers were recanted, jurors apologized, and the families of the executed were given compensation for their loss.
Is there any idea worth more than a human life? In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, John Proctor decides that he has nothing left to live for, and therefore becomes a martyr. The question for him or one in his position would be whether or not there exist causes worth dying for and if his position is one such case. There is no principle worth more than a person’s life and therefore principles worth dying for, only principles worth living for.
Some may be able to prove that Abigail Williams is innocent, however she is not because of blaming and “proving” in a certain way that those innocent people were using witchcraft. After she found out the people were hanged, she fled in terror without telling anyone where she was going and
The Crucible – Characters and Changes & nbsp; Change is good for the future. " We hear the catchy phrase everywhere. From company slogans to motivational speeches, our world seems to impose this idea that change is always a good thing. Assuming that the change is for the better, it is probably a true statement in most cases. The root of this idea seems to come from the notion that we are dissatisfied with the state that we are in, so, in order to create a more enjoyable environment, we adjust.
with what you feel are the main themes of the play that you want to
The Crucible – Forgiveness & nbsp; The Healing Power Of Forgiveness - The Gift of Reconciliation. The weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is the attribute of the strong." --- Mahatma Gandhi & nbsp; Forgiveness is a process of inner healing. For most of the people in The Crucible, they did not need to necessarily forgive others but forgive themselves.
Great events, whether they are beneficial or tragic ones, bring change in a person. These scenarios can give one an entirely new perspective on life, and turn around his way of thinking. Events such as the Salem Witch Trials show the people involved what they could not see before. In Arthur Miller's The Crucible, Elizabeth Proctor, Reverend Hale, and John Proctor gain valuable insight into themselves, as well as others.
In the Crucible, we are introduced to the main protagonist John Proctor; the way that Arthur Miller presents him by rebelling against the authority in Salem. Out of the entire town he is the only person that speaks out, realising that the authority is unfair and unjust; he is not like everyone else in the town who keeps quiet to themselves. There are many situations where we the readers can see very clear examples of him rebelling against the authority that controlled Salem. One example of Proctor rebelling against authority in Salem was when he did not go to church on a Sabbath day and instead decided to pray in his own home ‘Mr Proctor, your house is not a church; your theology must tell you that’. That is one clear example of him rebelling
-If you were in the same class I was in 2017 you may know why I named this like this. Also if you read The Things They Carried or know your vocabulary. Not just the name are familiar but the the whole story was about, WAR!!!. But this is much toxic and less world wide.
The Crucible was written in the early 1950s as an exploration of events which took place in Massachusetts in 1692. What does the play have to offer an audience in 2014?
The witchcraft trials became a significant event in Salem. There were 20 innocent people that died and many more accused. There is a debate on whether who was the main reason for the witchcraft trials and all the deaths of the accused. There are good arguments on about every side. Judge Danforth, Abigail Williams, John Proctor, Reverend Hale, Reverend Parris, Elizabeth Proctor and Mary Warren are all the main arguments for the blame. Personally, I believe that Abigail Williams is the main reason why the witchcraft trials came about and that so many people have died and were accused.
American president Abraham Lincoln once said, “In the end, it’s not the years in your life that count. It’s the life in your years” (www.brainyquote.com). How long someone lives does not matter more than how they live. People remember actions more than anything else. Many people have two choices in a dilemma. They have to analyze different causes and effects the choices have. People have to choose the outcome they want to be known. Just as in life, literary characters have to choose between two opposite actions and live with the consequences. In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, John Proctor faces a crucible that causes him to question whether he will live or die. Because of his crucible, Proctor feels guilt, hopeless, and satisfaction.