Persuasive Essay On Protecting Endangered Animals

Most ordinary nature enthusiasts who want to protect endangered species do not appreciate nature seriously. Their picturing of a natural environment is usually limited to green or vast remote lands, which welcome wildlife and appear less troubled and false than cities. People who value nature this way are similar to those “90s kids” on the Internet who treat the 1990s as better than any other decade. Their only reason as to why is often because entertainment, particularly television, was superior at the time. Both “90s kids” and typical nature followers suffer as surface dwellers, since they do not ponder about their interest to reasonably argue why it is greater than anything else, or why it is essential for themselves and others. However,

Of course, these practices build up concerns like protecting endangered species, but also leave some lurking flaws for them. In Robert Michael Pyle’s essay, “The Extinction of Experience,” Pyle points out that most efforts of conserving endangered species are exclusive to truly rare ones that tend to be in remote climates. This leaves any potential extinctions of local wild species out of the question, and can ultimately result in the “extinction of experience,” when “the loss of neighborhood species endangers our experience of nature” altogether (260-261). Pyle is certainly more sincere than those typical nature lovers, as he is concerned with a practice that affects a form of nature we have easy access

Stating something like “I think saving rare species is good” is not enough. People usually give up on thinking about a specific matter due to their impatience with the lengthy “solving” process or with how broad the matter is. Unfortunately when people think the conservation of truly rare species is admirable, they apply this thought into their lives with a lurking ambivalence despite the approval of some authorities in nature. Believing involves accepting something as undoubtedly true. In contrast with the last quote, the statement — “I believe that rare species are valued too much” — has a better chance of being more concrete. Believers usually search for the best support they can possibly give for their arguments and refuse to stop doing so, no matter how broad their concerns are. While they will not leave rare species completely out of the question, believers can bring up an argument like Pyle’s “extinction of experience” as to why such species are too cherished. Thinking is only short-term, but believing is long-term. With a comparable attitude to Pyle, author Joy Williams believes that Florida is dead since people fail to respect the state properly, leaving it as unpleasant. She indicates in her essay named after the state that Florida used to have a “natural strangeness and beauty . . . with its connotations of