Persuasive Essay On Brave New World

People desire to have community, identity, and stability in the world. The world is corrupt with greed and anger that people wished to have a utopia. A utopia that will have peace, where children could laugh freely without seeing the worried faces of the parents, where parents don’t have to struggle everyday to struggle to survive for their family. In the book “Brave New World” by Aldous Huxley, it talked about how all the three requirements, community, identity, and stability are complete and everybody is happy the way it became. They threw away literatures like Shakespeare’s work, any attractive art work that would please the people, and create science that would duplicate babies without having the women getting pregnant whenever she and her partner have

Most of the book came true, though, like 3d videos with effects, comfortable massaging chair, how to prevent women from getting pregnant during sex, and more.

Some people would think that it would be awful to lose that freedom and knowledge for the sake of having a utopia; others would think it is a great idea of replacing those rights for world peace. I disagree with Huxley’s ideas of losing more human rights for community, identity, and stability.

The World State citizens have limited ideas that would render their ideas for themselves and their continent as well. World State residents were taught through hyper(something) and not by the book; learning that books were “evil” and shouldn’t be touched at all time. When the World State people were babies, they would be curious on many fascinating objects and would be experimenting on how the objects work.

Whenever the babies would try to reach for the books, loud noises would spook and frighten the infants that they would cry out of fear and shock. Then a softer music would calm the babies, luring them somewhere else where they wouldn’t touch the books.

Why would the World State government actually teach infants to stay away from