Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of studying biology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of studying biology
“Personality is Reflected in the Brain’s Intrinsic Functional Architecture:” Source Evaluation The article “Personality is Reflected in the Brain’s Intrinsic Functional Architecture” was published in 2011, in the 11th Issue of the 6th Volume of PLOS ONE. PLOS ONE is the world’s first multidisciplinary Open Access journal. By accepting research regardless of the subject area, PLOS ONE aids in establishing connections between research disciplines. The journal’s process of rigorous peer review ensures that each published study is technically sound. It was published online on November 30, 2011. The article was written by Jonathan S. Adelstein, a clinical instructor in the Department of Psychiatry at the New York University School of Medicine. Adelstein studied …show more content…
Psychobiology and English Literature at Swarthmore College.
He obtained his MD from New York University. He has worked on seven other studies concerning applications of brain architecture. The study was conducted in order to describe “how personality traits are reflected in the brain’s function architecture.” Thus, Adelstein’s primary purpose for writing the journal article was to expand the base of knowledge about the connections between the brain and personality. The source is current, accurate, and relevant to my research. By describing personality through the establishment of concrete links to the brain, the study attempts to uncover the ways that personality is encoded in the brain. Since it was published in November of 2011, the source is current, making it more credible. The study’s accuracy is proven in several ways. First, the process of peer review employed by PLOS ONE ensures that the journal is error-free. Secondly, the study utilized resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) analyses, which have been used in other studies. RSFC patterns have been successfully
related to inter-individual differences in trait measures (such as social competence, risk taking, working memory, aggression, and cognitive efficiency). Thirdly, the study analyzed past research and then expanded the previous findings. For example, other studies suggested that the brain circuits revealed by analyses of RSFC represent intrinsically organized functional brain networks. The study then employed RSFC to identify intrinsic functional networks associated with each of the five personality domains. Lastly, the study supports other sources by directly citing other studies while bringing new research to the field. For example, the article cited previous studies that formed the basis of the knowledge that was utilized in the current study. The study relates to my research question. It provides basic research on personality that lays the foundation of my knowledge about the topic. Furthermore, it directly connects personality to the brain, and it reinforces the five main domains of personality (neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness). Lastly, it focuses on the ways that personality can vary from person to person, as evident in different brain structures and functions. The study investigated the way that personality traits are reflected in the brain’s architecture. The researchers used resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) to study neural correlation to the five-factor personality domains. Based on seed regions placed in two cognitive “hubs” in the brain (the anterior cingulate and precuneus), each domain of personality predicted RSFC with a unique pattern of brain regions. The patterns corresponded with functional subdivisions responsible for cognitive and affective processing. The study revealed that neuroticism predicted connectivity between seed regions and the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, while extraversion predicted connectivity between seed regions and the paralimbic regions. These areas are typically associated with emotional regulation, self-evaluation, and reward, which are consistent with the trait qualities. Personality traits were mostly associated with functional connections that were inconsistently present across all participants. The researchers concluded that a fundamental, core functional architecture is preserved across all individuals, while connections outside of that core encompass the inter-individual differences in personality.
Haney, Craig; Zimbardo, Philip. American Psychologist, Jul98, Vol. 53 Issue 7, p709, 19p, 2 Black and White Photographs,
It has become quite clear in the field of Psychology, and to some Psychologists like Windy Dryden (Individual Therapy) explicitly clear that there is a missing linkand that somewhere amongst the mass of theories on personality, the answer is staring them in the face.
Schacter, D. L., Gilbert, D. T., & Wegner, D. M. (2010). Psychology. (2nd ed., p. 600). New York: Worth Pub.
Zillmer, E. A., Spiers, M. V., & Culbertson, W. C. (2008). Principles of Neuropsychology (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson, Wadsworth.
Torgersen, S. (2009). The nature (and nurture) of personality disorders. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(6), 624-632. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00788.x
Cervone, D., Pervin, L. A. (2008). Personality: Theory and research (10th Ed.). New York: Wiley.
Feist, J., Feist, G. J., & Roberts, T. A. (2009). Theories of personality. New York:
Personality disorders are inflexible maladaptive personality traits that cause significant impairment of social and occupational functioning. Personality disorders can affec...
Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White. “Psychology”. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2006
Magnavita, J. J. (2002). Theories of personality: Contemporary approaches to the science of personality. New York: Wiley.
Friedman, H. S., & Schustack, M. W. (2012). Personality: Classic theories and modern research (5th ed). Boston , MA, USA: Pearson
Personality is the study of an individual’s unique and relatively stable patterns of thinking, feeling, and behaving over time and across situations and it is what distinguishes one individual from another. In the past changes in personality were thought to have only occurred in the developmental stages of childhood and solidifies in adolescence. After the teenage years it was thought to be set like plaster or the change seen to be inconsequential or absent( Srivastava, John, Gosling, and Potter, 2003). However, recent studies have suggested that changes in personality traits continue to occur throughout an individual’s lifespan due to multiple reasons.
The role of the frontal cortex in social cognition and decision making is now well-recognised; in the 19th century, however, neurologists were only just beginning to realise these connections. Gage’s injuries provided some of the first evidence that the frontal cortex was involved in personality and behaviour.
Our personalities are what distinguish us from each other beyond our appearance; without them, we would all behave and react in the same way. Personality is the reason we are outgoing or introverted, persistent or blaze, and anxious or calm. We each have different levels of these competing characteristics that make us unique. But why are personalities so varied? Personality is determined by an array of factors from genetic and biological to the personal experiences and decisions we have faced from the day we are born. The complexity of our personalities cannot be simply explained, and for this reason there exists many different theories of how it’s developed and personality is still deeply under study. I went into this subject with an open-mind
Personality is the expression of a person’s traits according to ones feelings, mentality and behavior. It involves understanding individuals’ traits such as withdrawal and willpower and how various parts of an individual link together to form personality. Personality expresses itself from within an individual and is comparatively regular throughout in an individual’s life. Different people have different personalities dependent on factors such as environment and genetic composition. Our personality is dependent on the success or failure of our development in the eight stages of life. This is proposed by Erik Erikson. Success in the development stages lead to virtues while the failure leads to malignancies.