Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should animals have comparable rights to humans
Should animals be given the same rights as humans
Should animals have comparable rights to humans
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Should animals have comparable rights to humans
There are certain times one must make a critical decision. One such decision would be if it is permissible to kill an animal. For many, a lack of knowledge prevents them from making their own decisions to prevent or continue in killing, but for others, if it involves life and death, it may be an obvious choice to stop. Then, there are those who could not care less, or even participate, in the killing of animals. If they could talk, it would probably be different. They would have a human-like aspect and be closer to a human than just another animal. The thought of killing a human makes some uncomfortable, so killing something so human-like would also be difficult
Personally, I do not believe killing an animal should be permissible. However, if the animal is suffering from a fatal illness; severe pain or injury, or if it is decrepit or dying then it should be acceptable. Yet, I
…show more content…
Humans are, after all, animals too. We evolved from apes. I do not believe that even though we are supposedly at the top of the food chain that this gives us the right to take the rights of animals away. They are living creatures, but so are we. If we have the right to life, so should they. Animals are like us because they have emotions and feel pain. Therefore, us humans should not be selfish and we should treat our counterparts with equal respect as they deserve. We should take their interests into consideration and to respect their right to not have pain unnecessarily inflicted upon them. Some rights do not necessarily qualify for animals since their interests are unlike ours, so some rights would be irrelevant, such as the right to vote, since this right would be as meaningless to an animal as it is to a child. However, they should have the right not to suffer as they do feel pain. This has been proven through many tests through various animals that they not only communicate, but also vocalize pain as
...tempt to diffuse violence. To even state that mans use of animals is immoral, and to claim that we have no right over our lives and must sacrifice our welfare for the sake of beings that cannot even think or grasp the concept of morality is ridicules. We would be elevating amoral animals to a moral level that is higher than our own, thus granting animals rights is not only fictional but wrong. In the words of Mat Block “Cows or cats would eat us to if they had a chance. Do not mistake a cats respect for one that is dominate for love, they are killers plain and simple and if you do not believe me ask their friends the birds”
Being able to think and reason should be a primary requirement for deserving dignity and respect. With no ability to think or reason how could an animal even understand that it is being treated differently than other animals. Fukuyama argues this point as well, “Human reason…is pervaded by emotions, and its functioning is in fact facilitated by the latter.” Clearly moral choice cannot exist with out reason but it can also be seen in other feelings such as pride, anger, and shame. Humans are conscious of their actions, in spite of acting on instinct as other animals do. Animals do not contemplate any deeper meaning of life or justify complex mathematical equations or even think about the question ‘why’; Humans, however, do think about those things. It is our conscious thought that sets us apart from any other animal in the world. Yes animals have perception and problem solving abilities, but unlike they are not able to understand complex knowledge based concepts, although they can solve problems within their normal parameters. Every animal on the planet should have the ability to solve problems but only to a certain extent, the extent of survival. When a situation becomes a matter of life or death animals must to be able to learn to live. Survival of the fittest has ultimately
In accordance with the “rights view” moral theory, since human beings are capable of moral obligations, they have a prima facie moral obligation not to kill animals and since animals are incapable of understanding moral obligation, the animals have a prima facie moral right to live (Lehman). Prima facie is a term used when a view is considered as correct until proven otherwise. The “rights view” however does not say that humans can never kill animals. In fact, under certain conditions, prima facie moral obligations can be overridden making it morally permissible for human beings to kill animals.
It’s really not up to the courts or government to determine what is good for a human life. It crazy how they will put an animal down for not having a home or attacking a human being. Do we give animals a choice on their lives? No, we do not we just do what we think is best for that animal. Many people fail to realize a lot of things. They always say if it was me I wouldn’t want that for myself. In all respect no one really knows what they want if they was in that position. As for me I would rather die than to have my family and love one see me like that at all. This is why its best to have a living will with a breakdown of everything you want to happen for each possible way an accident can occur.
Every person in this world should accept the fact that animals are living beings just like us. Additionally, every person should accept that animals are not ours to experiment on, to torture or kill them for our own purpose. It is a well-known fact that they are intelligent creatures and most important – they do have the ability to think, to feel anger and happiness, they want to make friends and to have life partners. Can you imagine the pain they feel when they are separated one from another or when they are simply excluded from the freedom to live only to die for cosmetics? Therefore, if we are against keeping people in captivity against their will, torturing them, doing cruel experiments on them and causing them to suffer and bleed to death then we should also be against animal testing. Consequently, if it is immoral and unethical to torture, do harm or kill a person then it should be immoral and unethical to do the same to these innocent living creatures
So while there are advantages to pet euthanasia, the cons far outweigh the pros. Pets are fun, and they are living things just like us. Killing them is absolutely unacceptable, especially when there are other solutions that work as well. While euthanasia is categorized as a "merciful ending," why should the end come at all before the animal's natural time? Now that you have read this paper, you know more about euthanization, what it is, and how to help prevent more animals from being killed. It's as simple as adopting a
Every year millions of animals are abused, injured, and hurt. It seems as if humans are not very concerned about animal rights according to these statistics.. Animal rights is the idea that animals should not have to suffer and be able to be in possession of their life. Some people are willing to sacrifice things such as certain brands of makeup or certain kinds of food to improve animal welfare. For many years animals have been experimented on and placed in factory farms. Factory farming is a method of producing food products where the factories value how much they produce and how much they profit over the welfare of the animals. These farms keep animals confined in small spaces and make the animals eat things they were not originally
Many countries around the world agree on two basic rights, the right to liberty and the right to ones own life. Outside of these most basic human and civil rights, what do we deserve, and do these rights apply to animals as well? Human rights worldwide need to be increased and an effort made to improve lives. We must also acknowledge that “just as one wants happiness and fears pain, just as one wants to live and not die, so do other creatures” (Dalai Lama). Animals are just as capable of suffering as we are, and an effort should be made to increase their rights. Governments around the world should establish special rights that ensure the advancement and end of suffering of all sentient creatures, both human and non-human. Everyone and everything should be given the same chance to flourish and live.
feelings as well as humans. We do not kill humans if they kill or eat
First of all, animals have the right to live. They too, want to live just like any other living thing, so why should we take that away from them. They are subjected to very painful and cruel procedures. It could be before or after they are done with them. This also deals with students too! One of the main reasons animals go through this is because schools are using them to further learn about them. Does it really benefit
When you hear the term euthanasia in reference to animals you think of the process that is used to end the suffering of an animal by putting them in a painless and permanent state of sleep. Today the term euthanasia is used to give reason to the murders of innocent animals all over the world. Animals should only be put down by euthanasia if they are in pain or suffering. Unfortunately most dogs that are euthanized over the course of the year are not aggressive or suffering from any disease (The Humane Society of the United States). Most of the animals are euthanized due to overpopulation in animal shelters. Euthanasia is a cruel and unnecessary practice that is not in the best interest for the animal.
Letting nature decide and not giving humans the ability to kill an animal whenever they feel it is right, is why we should stand against euthanasia. I strongly believe that the lives of animals should not be in our hands, but instead be decided by
The abuse that animals endure at human hands is heartbreaking, sickening, and infuriating. Animals are just as delicate as humans, so why not abuse us too? Animal lives should be just important as ours. No animals should be killed or abused for testing, entertaining, clothing, or hoarding. Every year, millions of animals are being killed and torture for testing.
...ed by law because of murdering others, then it is wrong to kill animals as well.
Animals DO have feelings. They may not be able to talk and tell us where it hurts, but they do feel pain, just like humans. There are laws to protect animals, just like humans. I do not feel as though the laws are strong enough, nor are they enforced the way they should.