Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical issues surrounding euthanising animals
Ethical issues surrounding euthanising animals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Terri Schiavo case study concluded to be a serious to the public. The outcome and misunderstandings surrounding her situation offer important lessons in medicine, law, and ethics. Terri Schiavo had a cardiac arrest, triggered by extreme hypokalemia brought on by an eating disorder. She suffered server brain damage due to her heart stopping for five minutes. Her condition was in great debate in the media euthanasia and guardianship of her state of living.
Terri Schiavo collapsed on February 25, 1990 in her Florida home from an “ice tea diet” which was related to her bulimia that was the result of a potassium deficiency. Due to her heart stopping for five minutes, Terri end up with brain damage. This brain damage was permanent and made Terri go into a vegetative state for the last fifteen years of her life. The doctors stated that there was no chance that she would return to normal someday. It wouldn’t be right to keep her on life support. It would bring a lot of change in hers and the people in her life.
Terri’s husband felt it will be best if she be taking off the feeding tube. He didn’t believe his wife would want to live the rest of her life with a feeding tube keeping her alive. Terri’s family didn’t feel like it was the best thing for her. Michael Schiavo felt her wishes should had been honored. He wanted the feeding tube to be removed which would cause Terri to die of malnutrition and dehydration. Her parents, did not want this, and wanted to keep their daughter alive no matter what.
Bob and Mary Schindler brought the issue to Florida courts many times, but every time they ruled that it was Michael Schiavo’s decision. Terri’s parents would not accept the verdict and they kept on fighting to keep their daughter alive. No...
... middle of paper ...
... was doing what he thought was best for her and what she wanted. We have the right to live why can’t we have the right to died when it’s nothing left of us to live.
It’s really not up to the courts or government to determine what is good for a human life. It crazy how they will put an animal down for not having a home or attacking a human being. Do we give animals a choice on their lives? No, we do not we just do what we think is best for that animal. Many people fail to realize a lot of things. They always say if it was me I wouldn’t want that for myself. In all respect no one really knows what they want if they was in that position. As for me I would rather die than to have my family and love one see me like that at all. This is why its best to have a living will with a breakdown of everything you want to happen for each possible way an accident can occur.
The Web. 08 Feb. 2014. “Experts weigh in on law keeping brain-dead pregnant woman alive.” CBS News. The Associated Press.
In the Chicago Tribune it stated that some supporters of the Schindlers has doubts of Mr. Schiavo ethics and his fitness for guardianship of Terri. They bought forward affidavits from his former girlfriends saying that they swore he confided in them stating he had no idea what his wife’s end-of-life wishes were. Also former care-givers of Terri stated that Mr. Schiavo was abusive to the home nursing staff and expressed the wish that Terri was dead. I feel this evidence is enough to put the feeding tube back in. To have so many people contest want Mr. Schiavo was saying and to just have the courts ignore it over and over again, I feel is unconstitutional.
Barbara Huttman’s “A Crime of Compassion” has many warrants yet the thesis is not qualified. This is a story that explains the struggles of being a nurse and having to make split-second decisions, whether they are right or wrong. Barbara was a nurse who was taking care of a cancer patient named Mac. Mac had wasted away to a 60-pound skeleton (95). When he walked into the hospital, he was a macho police officer who believed he could single-handedly protect the whole city (95). His condition worsened every day until it got so bad that he had to be resuscitated two or three times a day. Barbara eventually gave into his wishes to be let go. Do you believe we should have the right to die?
The facts of the case are now more readily available thanks to the internet. When the story first broke in 1992 the internet was still in its infancy. Most of the media coverage at the time came from print and television coverage and most of that was not comprehensive at all. The initial jury award of almost 3 million dollars was sensational, grabbing headlines all over the world. Now with the advent of the internet in its modern form the facts are coming out about what actually happened. It turns out that Mrs. Liebeck was actually injured far more seriously than most realize and received far less money than was actua...
When a person takes another person's life, then that person should have his own life taken as well. Beautiful dark-haired Gina and her sweet brown-eyed babies, did not ask for, nor want, their precious live...
In an effort to provide the standard of care for such a patient the treating physicians placed Ms. Quinlan on mechanical ventilation preserving her basic life function. Ms. Quinlan’s condition persisted in a vegetative state for an extended period of time creating the ethical dilemma of quality of life, the right to choose, the right to privacy, and the end of life decision. The Quilan family believed they had their daughter’s best interests and her own personal wishes with regard to end of life treatment. The case became complicated with regard to Karen’s long-term care from the perspective of the attending physicians, the medical community, the legal community local/state/federal case law and the catholic hospital tenants. The attending physicians believed their obligation was to preserve life but feared legal action both criminal and malpractice if they instituted end of life procedures. There was prior case law to provide guidance for legal resolution of this case. The catholic hospital in New Jersey, St. Clare’s, and Vatican stated this was going down a slippery slope to legalization of euthanasia. The case continued for 11 years and 2 months with gaining national attention. The resolution was obtained following Karen’s father being granted guardianship and ultimately made decisions on Karen’s behalf regarding future medical
She was a 29 year old newlywed with a terminal brain tumor that lived in California. After learning about her tumor she had several procedures done to attempt to stop the progression of the growth of the tumor. Unfortunately, not only did the tumor not slow down, it actually became more aggressive. The doctors gave Brittany six months to live. The doctors presented her with options of treatment where the hair of her scalp would be singed off and her head left with first-degree burns, among others. She had to weigh her options and determine her quality of life. Her and her husband came to the difficult conclusion that there was no treatment that would save her life and all the treatments that were suggested to her would destroy the quality of the time she had left. She did not want to put her family through the nightmare of watching her decline and suffer on hospice and so she decided that death with dignity is what she wanted to
Justice is something that we all as human being want to see fulfill, especially when we are the one that need it for us or our love ones. The family members of those who were killed by Susan Atkins and her companion will agree with it. The damage cause to their dears and the endless pain and suffering in effect from their death will support the decision take by the parole board in September 2, 2009 in the denial of a compassionate release due to Atkins’ health.
The discussion about what palliative care really is was brought up and how there are so many different perspectives people can have with the idea of palliative or hospice care. The same idea pertained to physician assisted suicide and what really makes that right and wrong. The book then begins to talk about multiple stores that were similar to Kim and Amy’s. Cases that were similar were mentioned, such as the three nurses who worked for Veterans Affairs Medial Canter and how they all had high mortality rates during the times that they worked along with more cardiac related deaths that
Sadly this happens to various animals each year that are brought to Kill Shelters. The ASPCA has stated that three to four million animals are euthanized in shelters in the United States. An absolutely shocking 60% of all animals that belong to shelters(McLellan). Many of these animals that are irrationally killed are completely worthy of adoption. The main reason for all these senseless killings is overpopulation.
She was left a quadriplegic and could no longer accomplish the activities she was used to doing, such as walking, swimming, and eating. Joni became severely depressed and sought to end her life. She requested to be euthanized.
Gabrielle Saveri. "An ethicist insists patients need help living, not dying." People May 1995. Vol. 43
Shortly after these debates details about the Nazi death camps of World War II and the role physicians played in the camps silenced supporters of euthanasia. As medical technology continued to advance and the availability and use of life support sparked a new debate about euthanasia. Patients have the right to refuse medical care even care that would sustain life (Emanuel, 1994). Currently this is referred to as a DNR or Do Not Resuscitate order. The right of patients to deny care calls to question if the patient can choose to die why can the not request euthanasia. In 1975 Karen Ann Quinlan lapsed into a coma after taking tranquilizers and drinking alcohol then slipped into a “chronic persistent vegetative state” Karen’s parents requested that physicians remove her life support and let her pass. The case was appealed to the New Jersey Supreme Court the parents argued that life sustaining treatments implicated the patients right to privacy. Roe V. Wade established a woman’s right to privacy in her right to terminate a pregnancy. The result of the Quinlan’s case was that they could remove Karen’s life support (Doerr, 1997). In 1990 the Patient Self Determination Act
End of life relating to persistent vegetative state. What defines end of life diagnosis or terminal disease process with less than 6 months to live? That is the exact argument that Tom Koch believes is why the wrong decision was made. Florida State said that no recovery possible bases on a long-lasting and irreversible condition. Those opposed to this philosophy argued that her condition was only end- stage and what would cause end of life is withholding and withdrawal of nutrition and hydration. Which provokes the next argument? If all cerebral function had ceased would Terri have been able to suffer? Did Terri have the sense of personhood? Personhood is defined, as an existential attribute that meaning is grounded on ones relationship to
.... Even though it may be an animal it's life is still precious. But mankind knows letting the animal suffer is wrong. So how is allowing a human to suffer right? Any type of creature in pain, suffering, and not wanting to live deserves the right to decide whether or not they continue on with life.