Argumentative Essay On Mercy Killing

1643 Words4 Pages

Mercy killings have occurred numerous times throughout history. There have been many that were beneficial to human life. There have also been many done in vain, or pure hate. Mercy killings, as well as assisted suicide, is 100 percent beneficial under certain circumstances. Though a controversial topic, mercy killing is an easy way out of pain, and is a favorable choice at times.
The first opposition to mercy killings was the Hippocratic oath which stated “I will not administer poison to anyone when asked to do so, nor suggest such a course”(Hippocratic). The Hippocratic oath was written by a Greek doctor who believed doctors must stay away from killing, only to be devoted to healing. The oath was an ethical foundation and guide for medical practice. Many physicians signed this oath up until the 20th century. This oath keeps physicians from helping persons in immense pain, from ending said pain (Hippocratic).
The first notable mercy killings come from the Greek era. The word has become associated with mercy killings, euthanasia, comes from the Greek words Eu(good) and Thanatosis (death) is means ‘good death’ or ‘gentle, easy death’. In Ancient Greece, before the Hippocratic oath, patients who were in pain had an assisted suicide and were given a poisoned drink. In this time it was said “Mentally and physically ill persons should be left to death; they do not have the right to live”(A General). This is not a true mercy killing, but one done out of hate, the wrong way to do one. In Ancient Rome euthanasia was regarded as murder, but sickly babies were left outside to die, a type of hate induced murder killing (A General).
When Hitler ordered widespread mercy killings in October of 1939, he did not know the true meaning of ‘mercy k...

... middle of paper ...

.... Even though it may be an animal it's life is still precious. But mankind knows letting the animal suffer is wrong. So how is allowing a human to suffer right? Any type of creature in pain, suffering, and not wanting to live deserves the right to decide whether or not they continue on with life.
Mercy killings, or euthanasia, is perfectly alright when done under regulation. They have occurred, legally or illegally, no matter what time period it was in history. Many have occurred out of hate, such as those conducted by Hitler. Others have been done to ease the patient's way into the afterlife, such as Dr. Kevorkian. We end the suffering of our beloved pets, who's lives are just as precious as ours. Under strict medical and legal regulations they can be beneficial to humanity and the patients life. They are an easy way out of pain, a is a favorable choice at times

Show More
Related

  • Physician Assisted Suicide Persuasive Speech

    1080 Words  | 3 Pages

    Intro: The Hippocratic Oath clearly states, “I will not give a drug that is deadly to anyone if asked [for it], nor will I suggest the way to such counsel.”Steven Miles, a professor at the University of Minnesota Medical School published an article, “The Hippocratic Oath,” expressing that doctors must uphold the standards of the Hippocratic Oath to modern relevance. Euthanasia continues as a controversial policy issue. Providing resourceful information allows us to recognize what is in the best interest for patients and doctors alike. Today, I will convince you that physician-assisted suicide should be illegal. The United States must implement a policy stopping the usage of euthanasia for the terminally ill. I will provide knowledge of

    Read More

  • Euthanasia and Frankenstein

    1448 Words  | 3 Pages

    Euthanasia comes from the Greek word that means “good death” (“Euthanasia” Literary). In general, euthanasia refers to causing the death of someone to end their pain and suffering oftentimes in cases of terminal illness. Some people call this “mercy killings.”

    Read More

  • T. V Show: Full House Vs. Modern Family

    711 Words  | 2 Pages

    I will discuss a T.V show that began in 1987 and ran until 1995 and compare that to a T.V show of today Modern Family; which first aired in 2009. The two are both American family sitcoms and comedies that have had great success throughout the air. These two shows are both unique in their own way. Full House is based in the late 80’s and early 90’s in San Francisco. Now Modern Family is today and still on air going for the 7th season based in the suburbs of Los Angeles. That if you look at the family photo of the entire Modern Family cast and the complete Full House cast shows how the typical sitcom family has changed over the time. 80’s to present

    Read More

  • Essay On Euthanasia In Canada

    612 Words  | 2 Pages

    In addition to lawfulness it is unethical. Doctors should not be given Legislative power to administer death since it can cause a slippery slope. For example, euthanasia is allowed in Netherlands for twenty three years and doctors have went from killing terminally ill who asks for it, to killing chronically ill who asks for it, and to newborn babies who are born with birth defects at their parents request. Furthermore, euthanasia might become the cost effective way treat people with terminal illness. For example, the patient might request euthanasia bec...

    Read More

  • Mercy Killing In Of Mice And Men

    422 Words  | 1 Pages

    Mercy killing is the act of taking someone’s life painlessly. Victims of mercy killing “include persons who are in a vegetative state or those who suffer from an incurable and painful disease or condition.” People argue and refute mercy killing whether it is acceptable or not. It is neither acceptable nor wrong, arguably it is required to be a necessity when dealing with cases when there are no other options than surviving in the world in misery. In Of Mice and Men, John Steinbeck’s character, Lennie, mentally ill, has committed a treacherous act of murder by mere accident because he was panicked. He is mercy killed by his close friend and sort of master, George, so that he will no longer be in misery and suffering. Mercy killing is a

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Physician Assisted Suicide

    1224 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Michael Manning, MD, in his 1998 book Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide: Killing or Caring?, traced the history of the word euthanasia: ‘The term euthanasia.originally meant only 'good death,'but in modern society it has come to mean a death free of any anxiety and pain, often brought about through the use of medication.” It seems there has always been some confusion and questions from our society about the legal and moral questions regarding the new science of euthanasia. “Most recently, it has come to mean'mercy killing' — deliberately putting an end to someone’s life in order to spare the individual’s suffering.’” I would like to emphasize the words “to spare the individual’s suffering”.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Right To Die

    1856 Words  | 4 Pages

    Life or Death? I see it fitting to start off by actually explaining what “Right to Die” is. The Right to Die is a principle based on a person’s choice to terminate their life or to endure voluntary euthanasia. The two Supreme Court cases that relate to the constitutional Right to Die are Cruzan by Cruzan V. Director, Missouri Department of Health and Washington V. Glucksberg . The first of these cases is based on the constitutional right of the state to interfere with medical decisions. Whether the state has a right to withhold the parent’s decision to remove life-sustaining support from their child. While the second case argues whether the state has a right to restrict a patient’s decision to partake in Physician Assisted Suicide.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay Euthanasia

    1299 Words  | 3 Pages

    The topic of assisted suicide has been a controversial topic across North America. Although both supporters and critics have expressed very different and logical views on the matter, competent terminal patients should be given the right to decide when they want to end their overall suffering. Euthanasia in Canada distinguishes between active and passive euthanasia. Active, is the act of intentionally killing a person to relieve pain. While withholding or taking away life-preserving procedures such as water and food, is passive. Over the last few years, Canada, more specifically Ontario has gained permission by provincial courts to end their life ahead of the federal government 's new law. In 2015, The judgement of the Supreme Court of Canada

    Read More

  • Life

    788 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to the Oxford dictionary, euthanasia is defined as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or an irreversible coma. Those in favor argue that this is done motivated by kindness and a desire to end suffering. Those against Euthanasia understand why those in favor of Euthanasia say it is ok to practice it, but one must understand that Euthanasia is contrary to the Hippocratic Oath. According to the Hippocratic Oath doctors should never, “give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect. Similarly I will not give to a woman an abortive remedy. In purity and holiness I will guard my life and my art” (par. 4). This oath is taken by all doctors after graduating and before they start practicing medicine. No matter what religious, ethnic or ideological position people take, it is undeniable that doctors carry a huge responsibility when dealing with patients’ health and lives. It is paradoxical to allow doctors to kill patients when their main goal is to prevent or cure a disease, and in other cases save lives. In times of great stress, relatives of ill patients rely on their doctors without questioning his decisions. This was the case of Dr. Harold Shipman, a respected man by his community and fellow coworkers, until he was found guilty of killing more than 250 people, mainly elderly women. Dr. Harold Shipman would visit his patients’ house and secretly give them an overdose of morphine, and then go back to his office and change his patients’ medical records to make it look like they died because of natural cause; few hours later his patients would die. In his trial, Euthanasia was ruled out because none of the victims had had terminal illness ...

    Read More

  • Euthanasia Essay - Physician Assisted Murder

    942 Words  | 2 Pages

    Every culture has a taboo against murder, including our own. The practice of physician assisted suicide is wrong across all religious and cultural groups. According to Leon R. Kass, M.D., the taboo against doctors killing patients, even on request, "is the very embodiment of reason and wisdom. Without it, medicine will have lost its claim to be an ethical and trustworthy profession." Before a physician is allowed to practice medicine, he/she takes the Hippocratic Oath, which is described by Encyclopedia Britannica as " a pledge to prescribe only beneficial treatments, according to his abilities and judgment; to refrain from causing harm or hurt". This oath has been practiced for more than 2000 years. If a doctor breaks that promise and helps a patient to purposely die, then the oath has meant nothing.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Death With Dignity

    1144 Words  | 3 Pages

    Death is something inevitable which all human beings must have to face today or tomorrow, or some part of their life.There are many people around the world sinking their lives in the darkness of dignity. Each and every day individuals all throughout the U.S. are diagnosed with terminal illness. They are compelled to wait until they die naturally, at the same time their bodies deteriorate by their sickness that will eventually take their lives. Some of the time, this implies living excruciating pain ,and that most states in our nation cannot do anything about it legally. People should have the will to live or die as the death of dignity is one of those acts that promotes this behavior , as a result it should be legalized all over the states,

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Death With Dignity

    826 Words  | 2 Pages

    In November of 2014, Brittany Maynard, having battled with an aggressive brain cancer for almost a year, succumbed to the illness and used the death with dignity act to pass peacefully and on her own terms. When Maynard got the prognosis that she would only have six months left to live, her and her family start researching and eventually came up with the heart-rending result that there is no treatment that would prolong or even save her life. The only option where she wouldn't have to be in pain for months and her family wouldn't have to watch her slowly wither away was using the death with dignity act. The death with dignity act is for people with terminal illnesses with six months or less to live and are mentally stable. When approved, a doctor prescribes you the medication that would end your life and you would be able to take it when your condition either worsened or you felt the time was right.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Assisted Suicide

    1062 Words  | 3 Pages

    Assisted suicide brings up one of the biggest moral debates currently circulating in America. Physician assisted suicide allows a patient to be informed, including counseling about and prescribing lethal doses of drugs, and allowed to decide, with the help of a doctor, to commit suicide. There are so many questions about assisted suicide and no clear answers. Should assisted suicide be allowed only for the terminally ill, or for everyone? What does it actually mean to assist in a suicide? What will the consequences of legalizing assisted suicide be? What protection will there be to protect innocent people? Is it (morally) right or wrong? Those who are considered “pro-death”, believe that being able to choose how one dies is one’s own right.

    Read More

  • Mercy Killing Case Study

    1066 Words  | 3 Pages

    It is a big question that most people often struggle with to decide when it is consider appropriate to assist an individual with mercy killing. In 1993, Robert Latimer a Saskatchewan farmer took the life of his twelve-year old daughter Tracy in an act of mercy killing. Latimer’s daughter suffered from the most dreadful form of cerebral palsy. She was severely disabled and had a mind of a four month old baby. Tracy was confined to a wheelchair and had endured multiple operations. She couldn’t walk, talk, or feed herself and she was in constant pain. After Robert Latimer learned that his daughter needed to go through another round of surgery, he knew he had to do something to save her from going through more pain. Therefore, Mr. Latimer decided

    Read More

  • Euthanasia: Not Morally Acceptable

    1644 Words  | 4 Pages

    The term of ‘mercy killing’ sounds very contradictory. Mercy, by definition, is a kind or forgiving attitude toward somebody that you have the power to harm or right to punish. As a trait exhibited by generous people, mercy is considered to be a virtue which we ought to pursue. On the other hand, killing, taking the life of other or oneself, is thought to be almost always wrong, and is condemned universally in most cases.

    Read More

More about Argumentative Essay On Mercy Killing

Open Document