More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction to an animal rights essay
Introduction to an animal rights essay
Introduction to an animal rights essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Is it ethical for people to use animals for learning purposes? To some people it might be ethical but what about the rest? Does their morality or gut feeling tell them it’s wrong. Should people be allowed to do this? The response from the majority of the community states that people shouldn’t use animals for learning purposes because they undergo surgery or harsh treatment on live or dead animals. This could potentially hurt and change the way they are. Not only does performing these actions have lots of effects on the animals, it also affects us too! There are plenty of more reasons in which using animals for learning purpose is not ethical.
First of all, animals have the right to live. They too, want to live just like any other living thing, so why should we take that away from them. They are subjected to very painful and cruel procedures. It could be before or after they are done with them. This also deals with students too! One of the main reasons animals go through this is because schools are using them to further learn about them. Does it really benefit
…show more content…
students? With this in mind, if we keep using animals for research it will cause an impact on the environment. It will disrupt local ecosystems and cause an abundance of critters to lose their food. Thus, the food chain will be in disorder. Using animals for learning purposes also causes animals to go through severe procedures. According to research in Peta’s Organization, they stated, “128,873 animals are subjected to sever pain near, at, or above the animal’s tolerance.” Not only that, but Health Research Funding Organization states, “Only 5 percent of animals used for experiments of any kind are protected by the Animal Welfare Act that the congress passed.” For this reason, countless of animals get treated cruelly. Not only that, but one of the main reasons in which animals are used for research is because students are learning more about them. According to Peta’s organization, many students report that after they cut the animal up they don’t remember learning anything about it. Is it really all worth it? Countless of animals’ lives are taken away from them and the majority of the time, it’s not worth it.
It’s shown that a large quantity of animals such as dogs, cats, frogs, and plenty of more are put through painful procedures. Not only that, but students don’t recall what they have learned.
Many people on the opposing side say that using animals for learning purposes could be a way for people to understand m People remember things they can touch or practice doing more than they remember information that they studied. It could also be a way to control animal shelter problems.
According to recent studies, about 61 percent of people performed better using human alternatives than dissecting. Studies also showed that using animals for learning purpose does help control animal shelter problems but half of the animals used once belonged in a home. You could be dissecting someone’s
pet. All of these are reasons of why people shouldn’t use animals for learning purposes. They are not for us to use. They have all the right to live. They should be treated nicely and with care.
Although not as strictly addressed, there is still a schism when it comes to the matters of experimentation involving animals. Those in opposition of it see it as being against the will of the animal, because animals have no say in the matter. However, through animal experimentation there has been vast medical advances in hospitals and veterinarians , research has led to cures for various diseases that would normally take many more years to cure, and the use of animals is highly ethical considering what could be the alternative, although there is progress being made to change these measures. This is how animal experimentation is of use to society for humans and animals.
Throughout all of human history, the pattern has remained the same—human technological and scientific progress has always involved testing on animals. Without that testing, modern medicine would be a shadow of what it is today. Many modern procedures stem directly from testing with animals. In addition, doctors and surgeons receive much of their training with the living tissues of animals. Computer simulations and other methods simply cannot compete with experience on a living being. For example, the United States Army formerly shot goats to train physician responses to gunshot wounds (Cole ...
In modern society, animal experimentation has triggered a controversy; consequently, vast amount of protests have been initiated by the animal rights community. Although these organizations have successfully broadcasted their concerns toward animal experimentation, its application continues to survive. Sally Driscoll and Laura Finley inform that there remain fifty million to one-hundred million animals that experience testing or experimentation throughout the world on a yearly basis. But despite opposition, animal experimentation, the use of experiments on animals in order to observe the effects an unknown substance has on living creatures, serves multiple purposes. Those particular purposes are: research of the living body, the testing of
...Because people see animal testing procedures as unethical and immoral, it’s important for them to consider what their health would be like without the process—potentially afflicted with incurable illnesses. Continuing the animal experimenting process can only prove beneficial in promoting fewer ailments and cures to existing and future diseases.
Every person in this world should accept the fact that animals are living beings just like us. Additionally, every person should accept that animals are not ours to experiment on, to torture or kill them for our own purpose. It is a well-known fact that they are intelligent creatures and most important – they do have the ability to think, to feel anger and happiness, they want to make friends and to have life partners. Can you imagine the pain they feel when they are separated one from another or when they are simply excluded from the freedom to live only to die for cosmetics? Therefore, if we are against keeping people in captivity against their will, torturing them, doing cruel experiments on them and causing them to suffer and bleed to death then we should also be against animal testing. Consequently, if it is immoral and unethical to torture, do harm or kill a person then it should be immoral and unethical to do the same to these innocent living creatures
One reason that animal testing is beneficial is that animals can sometimes make better research subjects then humans because of their shorter life cycles. For example, laboratory mice only live for two to three years, so researchers can study the side effects of the tests that are preformed over a whole lifespan, which would not be possible ...
Dissection has one essential as they give students a hand on experience. How can you get a degree to be a veterinarian if you never had a hand on experience? Contrast, you can see things you’ve been curious about. Even though they are trying to learn about animals, it’s still abusing. In an ethical eye, they can quickly absorb the looks and physical appearance of the inside of an innocent animal. On the positive side, it can be for a good cause like if animals could have cancer or they could have a deadly, unknowable, clueless, incurable disease. What if they cut that animal open and the bacteria and disease is released? Therefore, they need to pick a different strategy for dissecting animals in all vet schools.
Hurting an animal is better than hurting a fellow human being right? Well imagine a child being ripped away from his mother in today’s society, for no reason. Would that be considered okay, or kidnapping? Imagine humans being forced to breed, just so their children can be tortured for makeup or a new facial wash. Would that be considered okay, or morally incorrect? People do not see animals as fellow living things, because they do not have the power to say no like a person can. They can’t stand up for themselves, leaving the people of the world to do it for them. Seeing that there are other ways to test out consumer products, why harm defenseless, breathing, loving, beings? With all things considered, animal testing “has no place in science today” (Goodall, 1).
Every year, over 100 million animals are killed for experimentation, biology lessons, medical/military training, and cosmetic, drug, and chemical testing. Animals are tortured all over the world and still lack lawful protection.
Is the use of animals in research justified? Should animal experimentation be permitted? Should these animals be liberated? A logical person would say the benefits justify the research. Without animal testing, products would be based on theory. No one would want to use something, which may damage eyes, be poisonous, cancerous, and cause birth defects. Animals used in testing are not from the endangered species list; also many of the types of animals used are killed each year by rat or mouse traps, animal control, exterminators, and animal shelters. Animal testing reaps great benefits such as finding effective drugs to combat disease, improve surgical procedures, and make products safe.
We should not need to harm animals for our wants. We should not put them through hurt and suffering. We should not experiment or test on animals, if it is not for a good cause. There are plenty of other choices we have and can use as substitutes
The abuse that animals endure at human hands is heartbreaking, sickening, and infuriating. Animals are just as delicate as humans, so why not abuse us too? Animal lives should be just important as ours. No animals should be killed or abused for testing, entertaining, clothing, or hoarding. Every year, millions of animals are being killed and torture for testing.
Animals should not be kept in captivity for any reason unless they have been harmed and need to receive treatment but they should be released as soon as they are healthy and capable of taking care of themselves again. The use of a captive animal for research, education, or entertainment is just wrong no creature deserves to have their life taken away for our benefit. Would you want to be captured and put in a tiny box or a fake little ecosystem, or abused and tortured because apparently that’s the only possible way to train an animal? How about just knowing that your real life is over and now all you get to do is put on a show for people? That is what we put these animals through for our entertainment we tear children away from their parents. In what way is that right? It’s just like kidnapping we put humans in jail for that but only when it’s another human. People act like just because they aren’t human that its ok and they lie to themselves telling themselves that its okay and that the animal will be taken care of, fed, and have a nice little “fake” forest or desert to live in. Just think of it as having a zoo full of humans, or stealing other humans to make profit or teach someone something new by doing something totally wrong and unethical.
Over 100 million animals are used in experiments; 95% of these animals end up dying. Animals are killed and mutilated for the sake of science. Some experiments can involve “blinding, severing of limbs, damaging brain, and ingesting various drugs.” (Coster,
In the world today animals are used for many purposes such as animal testing, sports, farming, etc. I support anything using animals as long as the animals are in a good environment and have a good welfare with basic essentials to live. I understand that all things are not fair and not everyone shares the same worldview and attitudes toward animals, but I will stand for my beliefs any day. Animals are just another species that God created and they should all be treated as fairly as us humans. All animals have their own destiny in life.