Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay into literary devicees
10 literary devices
Essay about c.s lewis life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
To initiate, this passage comes from the British writer C.S Lewis and his prose piece ‘Perelandra’. It was published in 1944 and thus probably written during the last couple of years of the Second World War (which ended in 1945). This piece is a descriptive narration which lacks any type of direct dialogue between the characters, as we mainly have only one, and has an interesting play on the verb tenses.
The fragment we were given is a three paragraph narration that has longer sentences at the beginning and little by little begins shortening them until by the final paragraph they are very short. The long sentences being used to slow down the time that will be very important in the passage and hence to build up the suspense and tension in the ambience until the sentences become short and speed up the time in the story, building the tension more and more to a point where it seems like something is coming or something will occur. The story is also told by a protagonist narrator which we know thanks to the use of the first person and the direct access to the character’s mind along with his feelings and thoughts. This narrator is retelling us the story (“I have naturally no wish to enlarge on this phase of my story. (…) I would have passed it over if I didn’t think that some account of it was necessary for a full understanding of what follows”[line 19-20]) of his trip over to Ransom’s house, a path which will trigger his paranoia and fear. The style of the writing is very direct as the narrator is practically in a one-sided dialogue with his readers.
As I said before, the story basically presents one character, of whom we don’t know the name but he is also the narrator, we are also provided with a referenced character named Rans...
... middle of paper ...
...s “And immediately the impulse to retreat, which had already assailed me several times leaped upon me with a sort of demoniac violence”(lines 34-35) in addition he says “If anyone expected me to go into that house and sit there alone for several hours, they were mistaken!”(line 36-37)
In conclusion C.S. Lewis utilizes all the literary tools at his disposal very effectively to create an empathy between the reader and the narrator, by utilizing the pace of the words and the sentences to create a tense and suspenseful environment, also he delves very deep into the mind and thoughts of the narrator so really the reader doesn’t have any information besides the biased information the narrator gives us. As well as utilizing a lot of repetition and description of his thoughts that will emphasize in the overall ambiance of fear to darkness, being alone and being insane.
The author uses diction in the passages to signify the effect of the author¡¯s meaning in story and often sway readers to interpret ideas in one way or another. The man in the story arrives to a ¡°[dry] desert¡± where he accosts an animal with ¡°long-range attack¡± and ¡°powerful fangs.¡± The author creates a perilous scene between the human and animal in order to show that satisfaction does not come from taking lives. With instincts of silence and distrust, both of them freeze in stillness like ¡°live wire.¡± In addition, the man is brought to the point where animal¡¯s ¡°tail twitched,¡± and ¡°the little tocsin sounded¡± and also he hears the ¡°little song of death.¡± With violence ready to occur, the man tries to protect himself and others with a hoe, for his and their safety from the Rattler. The author criticizes how humans should be ¡°obliged not to kill¡±, at least himself, as a human. The author portrays the story with diction and other important techniques, such as imagery, in order to influence the readers with his significant lesson.
Human beings always believe that what they want to do is ‘up to them,' and on this account, they take the assumption that they have free will. Perhaps that is the case, but people should investigate the situation and find a real case. Most of the intuitions may be correct, but still many of them can be incorrect. There are those who are sceptical and believe that free will is a false illusion and that it only exists in the back of people’s minds, but society should be able to distinguish feelings from beliefs in order to arrive at reality and truth.
Subtext is the underlying theme within the story. Subtext in this story comes from the character of Arnold Fiend who tries to convince Connie to leave with him. An example of dialogue with subtext is “Honey," he said, talking right through her voice, "Honey, I’m not coming in there but you are coming out here. You know why?" (Oates 7). What is being said here is a clear threat however he is not outright saying so. By Arnold telling her although he will not be entering the house sooner or later she will be going with him whether she likes it or not. Summarized dialogue also appears in the text. Summarized dialogue is when the Author wants to avoid unnecessary dialogue and holds dull material. An example of this type of dialogue is “You don 't want them to get hurt," Arnold Friend went on. "Now, get up, honey. Get up all by yourself” (Oates 9). Arnold does not have to explain to Connie that if she does go with him that he will kill her family and ruin her life. I think the reason the author summarized this part is because Oates wanted to establish the conniving techniques that Arnold showed in the beginning of the story. Arnold did not have to say that he was going to murder Connie’s family his simply threat was enough. Doing this also adds an element of mystery and suspense to make the reader wonder. He did not confirm that he was going to kill but do
The story is told in the first person voice. The narrator is talking to one particular person; He refers to this character in the second person voice. “This is your
... if Meursault has been keeping this anger pent up inside him, and reveals the passive aggressive tone in his slow pacing; the reason the tone in the slow pacing is passive aggressive is that although it seems calm at first, if Meursault was truly fed up with the way the chaplain judged him then he has no reason to be calm, and it was merely a formality to try and keep his usual composure, so by shifting into the fast pace questioning we can almost visualize Meursault’s teeth grinding when he says “I had done this and I hadn't done that.” What this leads us to question is whether this moment of letting loose is Meursault finally not avoiding the “dark wind” that had been rising toward him, since describing it in such a manner makes have an ominous presence that is unpleasant, and by expressing his gripes with the world around him he can die with a clear conscience.
It begins as the narrator is trying to calm down Usher. He reads a story and similarities begin to take place, “it appeared to me that, from some very remote portion of the mansion, there came, indistinctly, to my ears, what might have been, in its exact similarity of character, the echo (but a stifled and dull one certainly) of the very cracking and ripping sound which Sir Lancelot had so particularly described.” These similarities begin to further unnerve the narrator until he notices Roderick Usher has turned he chair to face the door and is saying nonsense. “We have put her living in the tomb! Said I not that my senses were acute? I now tell you that I heard her first feeble movements in the hollow coffin. I heard them –many, many days ago –yet I dared not –I dared not speak!” It is then that the narrator fully grasps the situation and after Roderick finishes they both look up to see Madeline Usher covered in blood standing in the door way. She attacks her brother in her last struggle and the narrator deathly afraid and paranoid for his sanity flees the house with great haste to watch it fall into the marsh as Usher had predicted with his gloomy sayings. This truly terrifies the narrator and leaves him horrified and truly shaken from what has happened. With this ending
It was extremely heavy and sometimes obvious with the amount of foreshadowing. It starts on the first lines of the story. “Penistone Road, Clapham, 20th August, 19-” (Harvey 385). The year being missing gives a clue to a major point later in the story. With good analytical skills, the reader can (correctly) assume that the end of the story will be the narrator writing about himself writing the story. The narrator most likely did not include the year because he wanted the reader to figure out that it was not supposed to be a year, but another date. The way the story is told is like a diary entry. The missing date at the end helps the reader determine the end for himself. In the end it is suggested that the character dies. However if the character does die, he does it after the story ends. This piece of foreshadowing shows that the narrator most likely dies. The story was finished being wrote close to midnight. If the character did in fact live, he would have made it to the next day and the date for the next day would have been written. Since the date is not there, the reader can assume that the character died, which fills in the missing pieces that the narrator leaves the reader to figure out. The foreshadowing continues on the same page. The main character, Withencroft draws a sketch depicting a criminal, who he meets later that day. Three pages later comes the next case of foreshadowing. The criminal that
Fear, suspense, and the upcoming revenge can be seen on the first line of the story when Montresor says, "The thousand injuries I had borne as I best could, but when he ventured upon insult, I vowed revenge." This line prepares the reader for the whole development of the story; it gives the reader a sense of fear, tells him that there is going to be revenge, but keeps him wanting to know how this will evolve (suspense.)
In conclusion Poe excellent use of characterization and imagery to depict fear and darkness, truly make The Fall of the House of Usher a story of the battles the we must face our fears in order to free our mind.
It should be mentioned that the story uses a myriad of figurative and metaphoric imagery. Throughout the novel the narrator injects his own views, often leading the reader to a deeper questioning of the story as it unfolds. He frequently speaks about what would happen if the main character were to do things in a different way. Also, through the interjection of varying levels of foreshadowing the reader gets a sense of where the story is headed. At one point the narrator says “…were I to t...
The author’s purpose is to also allow the audience to understand the way the guards and superintendent felt towards the prisoners. We see this when the superintendent is upset because the execution is running late, and says, “For God’s sake hurry up, Francis.” And “The man ought to have been dead by this time.” This allows the reader to see the disrespect the authority has towards the prisoners.
For not only does Drndic keep suffocating the reader in her immensely long sentences, but she also increases her usage of commas. These commas cause her long sentences to be broken up and jumbled. They do not flow and if anything they cause the tempo at the end of her story to increase. For instead of long flowing sentences such as, For sixty years now these blind observers have been pounding their chests and shouting, We are innocent because we didn’t know!, and with the onset of new wars and new troubles, we know see such sentences as …until Martha Traube informs me of the agonizing truth of my birth, I dig into nothing, into no past, just as many others never do, why should they, life goes on, look to the future (pg.93, 336).They cause the reader to feel like they are running so fast they are tripping over their own feet. For as the reader tries to run to the end of Drndic’s story these commas, keep tripping them up, and up, and up. For Drndic cannot merely allow her victim to escape without a fight. However, everything must eventually come to an end and so on the last final pages of Drndic’s story we, the reader, finally can catch our breaths. Her usage of commas, diminishes, her long sentences become somehow more manageable to the
The narration is broken up into paragraphs of various lengths, all of which contain long and detailed sentences. E...
In the first two lines we are given the stage in which the dead man’s story is to be told.
... normally does with all of his fiction novels. He does this by using metaphors, symbolism, imagery, and more. Through the Chronicles of Narnia, I think that C.S. Lewis wanted to let his audience know that there is a higher power and that good can overpower evil.