Pepsi Case Analysis

1035 Words3 Pages

authors informed that, the CEO of Pepsi Company came up with this plan right after two days of Coke Company announced their plan about opening a $14 million bottling plant, it can be understood that the CEO of Pepsi Company came up with this plan simply to compete against Coke Company and promote their brand in China more than the Coke Company. Moving to the facts from analysts, the authors informed that, “Neither company releases sales or profit figures for the country, but analysts say Coke has 52% of the carbonated soft drink market, vs. Pepsi 's 32%. Coke also has the top soda brand, Sprite. But Pepsi-Cola is No. 2, while Coke 's flagship, Coca-Cola, is third” (Einhorn and Byrnes, 2009, p.70). According to the facts from analysts provided
Its marketing strategy is mainly to work within the company, “Performance with a Purpose” Strategy” (p.1), it clearly shows that, the author started her article with some general information about the Pepsi Company, informs about the position along with informing the position of the rival company, Coke. Also, it is clear that, she starts her main argument, which is about marketing strategy right in the beginning paragraph. Talking about the marketing strategy, the first and most effective strategy, the author informed about is the “Performance with a Purpose”
With the times changing PepsiCo and other soft drink companies realized that when people go to have a snack they look for a drink as well, and with consumers looking for the healthy option soda company’s like PepsiCo were losing customers” (p.1). This is a creative and effective marketing strategies by the Pepsi Company since, they could realize the wants and thought of providing the need. In this case, the want was a drink with a snack, and their plan was to provide the most suitable drink with the snack, so that more people will buy their product, and their brand will promote. Since the consumers were looking for healthy soda drink instead of any kind of soda, this strategy didn’t work so well because they were losing customers like some other companies. However, it didn’t stop Pepsi Company to use this strategy, rather the company came up with a new strategy provide the healthy soda drink with the snack and be profitable at the same time. According to Ryder (2013), “PepsiCo introduced the “Power of One” in which PepsiCo purchased the two largest bottling groups, New York based Somers Pepsi Bottling Group (PBG) and Minneapolis based Pepsi-Americas. This merge gave PepsiCo direct control over 80% of its bottling network” (p.1), their new strategy

More about Pepsi Case Analysis

Open Document