Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and Contrast Holocausts
Holocaust research papers
Holocaust research papers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
What did you enjoy better? The movie or the book? They were both different in many ways, but they were also the same in many ways. First, in the movie, some of the characters were missing such as Gitl, Tzipporah, Rueven, Yitzchak, Fayge, Rachel, Yente, and Rosemary(Hannah's friend). Also Cousin wolf and grandpa Will. The reason for this is because the movie isn’t trying to match up with the book, but to illustrate how harsh the Holocaust was and ,in addition to how inhumane the Jews were treated in the concentration camps. Also, without all of these characters, it makes it easier to get the point across. Another thing was that Hannah was old enough to drive and get a tattoo and was an only child in the movie. However, in the book, Hannah was 13 and had a younger brother named Aaron. Finally, in the book, there is no seder in the women's barracks. But in the movie, in order to make Rivka feel better after her mother's death Hannah does a seder A lot of the scenes in the movie where different and a lot of scenes weren’t included. Such as the …show more content…
Hannah initially demonstrates an apathy toward her own heritage. She has no interest in going to the Passover Seder dinner and sees it as something to be endured rather than to be celebrated. Prior to the dinner she spends time at her friend Rosemary's house, where she eats a meal ahead of time. Rosemary is not Jewish and Yolen implies that Hannah actively avoids anyone of a similar background to her own. The Passover Seder is a ritual designed to commemorate the past and those who have come before. Hannah has little interest in its origins or relevance in the present. It is not until she is torn from her own family and transported to a dark period in history that Hannah comes to appreciate her heritage. She is alive because of decisions and sacrifices that were made by others well before her own birth. If these sacrifices had not been made, she might never have
The movie and the book were both appreciable and they illustrated how important remembering is. I personally liked the book better because it had more details and I liked the characters better. I liked Gertrude and Aaron. I would recommend this book to 8th graders around the world because it fits their age. They need to know that remembering the past is essential and that the Holocaust did not just happen to Jews. Always remember, and never, EVER,
book was blander. The book did not catch my attention as much. The movie really caught my
The books, A Wrinkle in Time and And Then There Were None, both have many differences in the movie versions. The directors of both movies change the plot to make the movie see fit to what they may have imaged the book to be, while still keeping the story line the same.
A Comparison A Sound of Thunder by Ray Bradbury and The Star by H.G. Wells
Such as Gitl was not there at all as she was in the book. Yitzchak, Reuven, and Tziporah are all missing in the movie. Also their is Aaron, Hannah’s brother, who is not there. They were an important bunch of people that should have been included because I think they built the plot a lot better when they were there in the book. Plot was different too, important plot details in the book were left out of the movie such as different jobs in the camp. In the book there was a bunch of variety when it came to jobs such as sorting, cleaning, digging. In the movie there was only
scenes from the film; this is due to a number of reasons. The main one
The book and the movie were both very good. The book took time to explain things like setting, people’s emotions, people’s traits, and important background information. There was no time for these explanations the movie. The book, however, had parts in the beginning where some readers could become flustered.
Although the book and the movie are based on the same story, there are many differences, but there are also many similarities. In the book, Hannah goes into a dream and time travels back to the concentration camps. She is transformed into Aunt Eva’s friend, Chaya, back in the concentration camps. She survives the harsh conditions. Her friend, Rivka, is getting taken to the gas chambers, when she takes her spot, and dies for her. But, in the movie, released in 1999, it is slightly different. Hannah time travels back to the concentration camps. She meets her cousin, Rivka, and becomes friends with her. She takes Rivka’s place and goes into the gas chamber for her. In both, Hannah is a generous friend and the Holocaust should be remembered forever.
There isn’t that many differences between the book and the movie. The main thing I noticed is that in the movie Igor Borkov (Stanleys best friend at the camp) plays a big part. In the book, he is mentioned very little. Also, when Sam dies in the book, Kate is with him in the boat. In the movie, Kate is standing on the side of the look and watches him get shot. Another difference I noticed is that in the movie Sir’s truck is silver while it a candy red in the movie. The last difference actually stood out pretty well. In the novel version, Stanley is pretty obese and in the movie he is fairly
He really wondered why shumel was what was there the whole time that he never knew about.In the film I noticed a lot of changes based on how he found out he was moving because in the movie he found out because his parents told him that they were going away and were going to move and he had to get his stuff all packed.Then in the book he found out he was moving when he came home from school and maria the maid started packing and once he came and found that he asks his mom and mom tell and explains to him that they are going to be moving.The second difference I noticed in the film how mom had a drinking problem in the movie she does not drink at all very much and in the book she drinks a lot more.The last similarity I noticed in the movie was how mom in the movie said the man I married is a monster and even your does not love you. On the other hand in the book grandma in the book does love him but is discouraged on what he does based on his work in the movie as a Nazi because he was apart of that Jewish part where the Jewish had to be slaves to them because they thought the Jews were bad people. In conclusion I noticed a lot of similarities and differences based on what I read and saw you should read this book because it helps you get a better understanding on what happens back then and what the Jews were put through
In the movie, there are more added scenes which have more action. For example, one would be when Jonas has to go to the nurturing center. There, he meets his friend Fiona to save Gabriel. Jonas has to save Gabriel because Gabe was going to be released (killed) because of his deformity. This is different from the book because they completely cut out Fiona and finding Gabe by saying, “And he had taken Gabriel, too” (pg.208). After Jonas gets Gabe, he goes on the journey to the border. But instead of Jonas and Gabe starving and crossing tough terrain, a plane that Asher, Jonas’ best friend, is controlling captures Jonas. Asher then has to decide if he can trust Jonas and let him venture on, or bring him back to the community where he will be punished. This creates more suspense than just starving because the audience does not know if Asher will trust Jonas or betray him after being friends with Jonas for all these years. The movie also shows what is happening in the community while Jonas is on his adventure to elsewhere. In that scene, Fiona is about to be released which means she will be killed. This is because she broke the rules by helping Jonas escape to elsewhere. This creates more suspense because Fiona, someone Jonas loves, could be killed if Jonas doesn’t continue quickly. I also want to add most of the action happens towards the end of the story because everything before that is just the ceremony and Jonas meeting up with the Giver. So, because the movie has more action and suspense, I believe it is one reason why the movie is better than the
Imagine how hard it can be to combine six different stories in a movie based on a book like David Mitchell’s famous novel, Cloud Atlas. For many filmmakers, creating an adaptation of the hardly comprehensible book of the English novelist seemed as impossible as catching a star. But the creators of the renowned Matrix, siblings Andy and Lana Wachowski, with the co-authorship of Tom Tykwer, managed to create a movie that brings the ideas of the book to life by adding a spark of their directive creativity and a touch of emotional strength.
“...a certain morning early in the month of June, the year of grace 1751, when I took the key for the last time out of the door of my father's house.” This quote is from the book Kidnapped. It takes place in the beginning of the book when David Balfour leaves his father's home to start his journey to his uncle Ebenezers house. This part of the story is an example of one of the many differences and similarities between the book and the movie. The purpose of this essay is to compare and contrast the movie Kidnapped and the book, also called Kidnapped. After thoroughly reading and annotating the novel and watching and taking notes on the film, it is clear to see that the book is much more detailed.
I cannot say that I prefer the novel over the movie. The novel has so much more story that was not placed into the film. I watched them movie before reading the book so I already had a preconceived idea of the characters. The novel leaves so much more to the imagination and really paints the dark picture of what it must have been like for people during this era in the South during the Civil War. The movie does a fantastic job as well but I don’t think it is as in depth, which is expected because of the length of the novel. The novel is over 1,000 pages and the film is 238 minutes, making it the longest movie at the time it was released, (1939). There are some very notable di...
...have the same emotional and interesting results to me as the novel. A reason for this may have been because if the director followed every minor detail of the novel the film would be too long to be shown. I believed that the novel conveyed the background information in a better manner giving the reader insight to setting, history and the nature of characters and their relationships clearer. A reason why I liked the novel better is that there were missing events in the film, therefore when viewing the film I was confused as it skipped events. Another reason why I believe the novel was better is that my imagination was a core aspect whereas when I viewed the film the surroundings, characters and everything overall was already presented. I quite enjoy the aspect of imagination and the details of events in the novel therefore to me I believe that the novel was better.