Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of the environment in shaping behaviour
Role of the environment in shaping behaviour
The role of heredity and environment in behavior
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of the environment in shaping behaviour
Stanley Yelnats is the main character in Holes. He is a very unfortunate kid that has really bad luck. He is sent to a summer camp for a crime that he didn’t commit. He has the option to either go to jail, or to go to the summer camp. He chooses to go to the summer camp because the authorities make it seem like its not that bad. Stanley thinks the camp has a lake in which they would get to swim in the 95+ degree weather. When Stanley gets to the camp, he finds out that its not what he expected it to be. He is soon forced to dig holes along with all of the other juvenile deliquents. This is hard for him because of the extreme heat and dry land.
The reason Stanley has bad luck is because his family is cursed. When Stanley was little, his great
…show more content…
grandfather Elya, made a promise to a gypsy that once a pig that he had grew strong, he would carry the gypsy up a mountain while singing her a song that she had tought him. When Elya’s lover failed to love him back he got on a ship that was going to America and forgot all about that promise he made. He soon begins to wonder about the promise he made because of his failure in life and his terribly bad luck. Elya knows that the gypy’s son lives in America but he could never find him. Long before Stanley got sent to camp Greenlake, the town is a magnificent place full of trees, water, and residents.
At this time, a school teacher named Kate Barlow falls in love with a black onion seller named Sam. When people of the town realise that a white woman was in love with a black man, they killed Sam and set the schoolhouse on fire. Kate become an outlaw and starts robbing and killing people while kissing the men she killed leaving a red lipstick imprint on her victims. She ends up killing Stanleys grandfather and burying his money somewhere but she died before she could tell anyone where it was. The day after Sam was killed, rain stop falling and Greenlake dries up.
There isn’t that many differences between the book and the movie. The main thing I noticed is that in the movie Igor Borkov (Stanleys best friend at the camp) plays a big part. In the book, he is mentioned very little. Also, when Sam dies in the book, Kate is with him in the boat. In the movie, Kate is standing on the side of the look and watches him get shot. Another difference I noticed is that in the movie Sir’s truck is silver while it a candy red in the movie. The last difference actually stood out pretty well. In the novel version, Stanley is pretty obese and in the movie he is fairly
skinny.
The movie and the story had some of the same characters but some weren't exactly the same. The movie introduced many different characters and changed some of the others. For example, the movie had the plant lady and had the mentor of Anderton as the founders of Precrime while in the book, Anderton was the only founder of Precrime. Also, Witwer wasn't blond he had black hair and Kapler wasn't named Kapler he was named Crow. In the story they had the red head Fleming who did not exist
In both the novel and movie focus on the war. The war influences the characters to enroll.Also, the main setting is at the Devon School. However, in the novel Gene visits Leper at his house but in the movie Leper lives in the woods.In the novel Gene is coming back to the Devon School 15 years later.However, in the book he is coming to Devon as a new student.Therefore, similarities and differences exist in time and setting in the novel and the movie.In the novel and the movie there are similarities and differences in events, character, and time and setting.
In the movie, it is told in a third person point of view and the characters look a lot more different than how they do in the book. The movie goes by much quicker than the book. Also Pony goes straight home after the church burns down.
Usually movies try to take the story to a different level or by adding parts or just try to change it to a completely different story. Some of the differences between the movie as to the book are some little and large differences. They might also try taking little parts away that will change how the readers see the story characters. An example of that would be Walter not smoking in the movie (Pg 115). Walter usually smokes because he is stressed or just as a way to relax. Walter also does not get punched by Mam...
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
The differences in the movie and the book might have been intentional. If audiences were to read the book, watch the movie, and reach conclusions, I think they would have great understanding of what’s inside them both. For example, a scene in the movie in which Atticus tells his children why it is a sin to kill a mockingbird was not in the book; from that scene, I inferred on how that became the initial title of the book. By using both resources, I was able to gather information and grasp its contents tighter.
One major difference in the movie that was not in the book was the starting scene of the movie was set in the moor with Sir Charles being attacked by the Hound. In the book the starting scene was when Watson and Holmes had just found a walking stick that had the initials C.C.H. on it. I think that the movie starting scene was more informative because it let you know about what was happening and it also gave some more suspense to the film.
Each version also has the main characters boarding up the windows. Anyone who thought the birds won’t attack are usually found dead, but in the movie they are found with their eyes pecked out. Also, both the story and the movie have REALLY bad endings! They aren’t very similar, but they both leave you hanging. When you see a movie or read a book you want to know what happens to the main characters. In these two, you didn’t get an ending. They left you hanging and for some people that ruins it all.
I have only included what I have to believe are largely important plot gaps and differences in the movie version in comparison to the book one, and so I apologize again if I have missed any other major ones. Forgive me, please.
Holes is about a boy named Stanley who is sent to a correctional camp for boys called Camp Green Lake. The boys are required to dig one five-by-five-foot hole per day in the 90 degree weather in order to help build their characters. In doing this, Stanley discovers that they aren't just digging for character. They are digging to uncover something for the warden: a treasure. In his attempt to uncover this treasure, Stanley observes and experiences the inhumanities that go on at Camp Green Lake.
One thing that can make a book good is characters. In the book, there were many more animals in the farm. The movie did not show many animals except for the main animals. Even thought this is a small difference, it can be noticeable. In the book, Mollie was a character.
Holes is a book about a boy named Stanley Yelnats who is convicted of stealing a famous basketball player’s shoes. His punishment for stealing a basketball player’s shoes is going to detention camp. Stanley believes that this all happened because of an ancient family curse or fate. This is true because both bad luck and fate led to detention camp where he turned his bad luck around once and for all.
In the beginning, Stanley was a wimpy and shy kid who had a low self esteem which made him a sad and depressed character in the story. Stanley was shy, awkward and his self esteem was low because he grew up being made fun of by Derrick Dunne. He was made fun of because he weighed a lot and was big kid. He had no friends and felt left out. (Sachar 7 and 23 ) Stanley was cursed and had bad luck.
He is 14 years old, overweight, bullied, and just plain unlucky. He is homeless, smart, and a fast digger. Still don’t know who I’m talking about; it’s Stanley ‘Caveman’ Yelnats IV and Hector ‘Zero’ Zeroni. These unlikely duo are the heroes of the book Holes by Louis Sachar. Today, this essay will tell you the differences and similarities of these two best of friends. From the difference between Stanley and Zero to how are they alike, both physically and mentally; I’ll list them all!
As a punishment, for 18 months he has to go to camp Green Lake, a camp for boys where you have to dig a 5 feet deep, 5 foot in diameter hole everyday. By digging holes, Stanley is supposed to be learning how to be a better person. The purpose of him digging the holes is to build character. “You know why you're digging holes? Because it's good for you.