More handpicked essays just for you.
Resilience for children and young people
Resilience for children and young people
Resilience for children and young people
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
"I'm sorry that I'm not sorry for believing that everything in life should be earned and I'm not about to raise two boys to be men by making them believe that they are entitled to something because they tried their best...'cause sometimes your best is not enough," linebacker for the Pittsburg Steelers James Harrison (Kozicka). Ever since competitions have existed, prizes have always been given out; the winner receives the big award, while the losers receive a participation award. Why does it seem that there is a fear of sending home a child "empty handed."(Wandschneider)? Although there are some benefits to children receiving participation trophies, they are greatly outweighed by the negative aspects.
Awarding a child with a confidence-boosting
…show more content…
Praising children for innate talents can make handling failure more challenging. On the contrary, praising effort encourages them to enjoy the activity more, work harder, and deal with failure in a more resilient way. Giving an award to a child for unwavering determination and dedication should not be viewed as wrong. Kids comprehend that the concept of a participation award is not the same as winning (Fadar). Therefore, regardless of the outcome, children deserved to be rewarded.
Just as there are many positives to the concept of participation trophies, there are also many negatives.
Parents feel they need to reward their child in every aspect of their life and if they fail to do so, their child else will suffer from lack of self-confidence.
Doing this would only add to the emerging culture of selfishness (Kozicka). The original idea behind participation trophies was that they would provide kids a boost of confidence that would push them to do more challenging things. However, today approximately 20 years of research proves this assumption to be false. It promotes a false sense of accomplishment, and instead of boosting their esteem, narcissism can occur
…show more content…
Praising a child's intelligence can decrease their performance and motivation, making cheating to succeed more likely after failure (Kozicka). How can children be expected not to be a 'sore loser' if they are never exposed to the feeling of failure?
After the downfall, children will then be embedded with a sense of fear of failure.
Around ten years ago, a teacher in Great Britain suggested that the word "failure" be abolished from educators' vocabulary, and instead use "deferred success." Doing this would prevent children from being exposed to failure, which would implant a sense of fear (Ray).
Parents do not like seeing their kids fail, but without allowing them to face it, they cannot mature. Failure should not be feared, but instead viewed as a coach, friend, and an instructor (Ray).
Effort should be encouraged, regardless if they fail in the process. Children will then be able to recognize that failure should not be feared, but embraced (Ray).
Giving awards to children for merely showing up is not preparing them for the harshness and reality of the future
After reading Failure is Not an Option by Nathan Wallace, we ponder whether failure is beneficial or not. However, after reading the passage, we stumble upon a quote where Wallace says “Failure is always an option. Failure can lead to great learning and progress when a specific failure is analyzed through the lens of a growth mindset.”
Some people may argue that if everyone gets a trophy, everyone will be happy. That might be an understandable concern, however, according to people on blog.sportssignup.com, “By acknowledging everyone with the same award we’re actually celebrating no one and even undermining the efforts of those who really deserve to be recognized.” Similarly, it makes the kids who work really hard feel like there efforts were equal or worse than the efforts of those who do not try hard and do not work hard. On the other hand, if everyone gets a trophy than winners are no longer special. Kids should play sports because they enjoy playing them, not because they want a trophy. It is like one of those arcade games at the movie theater, you keep playing until you win. Another way to say this is, sports were made because they wanted to let people have fun and try to compete, but now sports is turning into the concept of everyone is a winner. Kids and adults feel like we are ruining what sports are supposed to be. In summary, many citizens think that kids should not get trophies for participation because only kids who work hard deserve
L. Hefferman’s article “ In Defense of Participation Trophies: Why they really do teach the right values?” it states “ An award is not really an award if everyone gets it.” (Today.com) In another article by Ashley Merryman called “Losing is Good For You” it says “Awards can be a powerful motivators but nonstop recognition does not inspire children to succeed. Instead, it can cause them to underachieve.” (New York Times Sept. 2013) It is clear, by not giving participation awards it make the children who do get awarded feel more special than if everyone gets one. Obviously, not giving participation awards to everyone gives more of a boost of self-esteem to the people who do get
For example Carol Dweck, a psychology professor at Stanford University in California, said in the article “Should Everyone Get a Prize?” written by Brenda Iasevoli that, “‘The trophy has to mean something,’ Dweck told TFK. ‘If we give a trophy to everyone, then the award has no value.’” This shows how if everyone gets a prize, there is no point in getting one at all. It means nothing to have it when everybody has one as well. Additionally, Dr Michelle Anthony an author and psychologist and Karen Coffin a coach who writes about youth sports agreed in the article “Should Everyone Get a Trophy?” written by Lauren Tarshis that “... trophies can lose their meaning when everyone gets one.” This explains how it is senseless to get the trophy because it no longer means anything to the child who receives it. As a result, giving everyone a reward takes away the
Participation is literally defined as “the state of being related to a larger whole” (Merriam-Webster) but that basic criteria is not always met. Participation trophies may seem harmless and do indeed have the child’s best interest in mind, but they just simply don’t translate to good adult qualities. If “everyone’s a winner” one is left to wonder how a child is going to learn
Have you ever gotten a trophy for just participating? Well, participation trophies are teaching kids the wrong message. Kids need to learn how to work hard for what they want, kids also need to see that you can’t always get a trophy for third place. We can not teach kids that they always will get rewarded for losing. Most kids don’t want a trophy for losing. They want to get a trophy for being the best. Do you really want a trophy for just for participating think about it.
When you look at those trophies sitting in your room on your shelf, do you really feel that you deserved all of them? Many kids get trophies all the time and some can even be earned by just showing up. If you are just showing up you really aren’t working hard. This is a big controversy for kids who plays sports right now. Let's be real, not everyone deserves a trophy. Do you really think you earn every trophy you get? First of all, if everyone gets a trophy there isn't a game going on, you have to learn how to lose, it’s an important life lesson, and you have to really earn a trophy or it takes away the point of the game
Scientists and psychologists argue that rewarding effort is beneficial because it provides positive reinforcement. Nowadays the norm is to hand out trophies to everyone on youth sports teams as long as they're on the roster. This is controversial because some believe this teaches kids that losing is okay because they will still get rewarded. This is incorrect because losing is okay and there are more important influences to a child's development. This shows why we should continue awarding kids with participation trophies in youth sports.
Children rely on their parents growing up. Parents wanting the best for their kids is a generally well known concept in 2016, but where should the line be drawn? When should a child be allowed to fail? Helicopter parents are parents that will obsess to make sure that their child will not fail, and because of this, the child can miss out on many social, physical and general life lessons a normal child with healthy parenting would receive. Although parents should want to be involved in a child's life, they should also let their kids learn from their own mistakes and let them have the same opportunities as a child with healthy parenting.
Trophies are meant to encourage children as they start out in sports, but not to depend on them. How is a child going to learn the importance of losing and not giving up if awarded for everything he or she does? The kid that works hard and wins will lose the desire to do his or her best, if everyone becomes the winner. When children are starting out in sports and learning the basics, the reward isn’t so important; therefore, presenting awards at this time could be more effective (Henson). Once a young person has learned the basics of sports and what it
Not everyone should receive a trophy. This is because not everyone is willing to put in the effort that it takes, of works hard enough for it. Working hard to achieve goals is important in life. People have been debating whether or not all kids should get participation awards. But not everyone should be given an award. Not everyone should receive a reward.
It should nearly be a given that this phrase rings true, “Participation trophies and classroom rewards should not be given out for every event that children do because it can give them false self-esteem that could hurt them later, create inabilities to handle failure and diversity that could lead to mental-health issues, and give children a sense of entitlement.” Trophies are not benefitting the children as those people will say they are. Too many rewards have given children a false sense of self-esteem which then leads to our children being narcissists and being susceptible to having false confidence, which will almost surely damage them later on in life. Participation trophies are also linked to the mental health issues of anxiety and depression. This presents the problems of increased risk of self harm and nervous breakdowns throughout the entirety of their lives. Participation trophies also give children a sense of entitlement. This may be the most damaging effect of participation trophies that has been studied. The sense of entitlement that is given to these children makes them unwilling to work hard and take pride in what they do, but instead enforce that taking the easy task and not doing your best at it is perfectly fine. While that may be fine in the stage of life they are at now, it will not be fine when it comes time for them to enter the workforce and get a job. Not only will they not be able to work to the best of their abilities, but they will also be more prone to either being fired or turned down from a job. Once this happens on an every child basis then companies will be forced to hire people that do not do the job that they are supposed to. So instead of rewarding children for showing up, society
Participation trophies are made to boost children’s self confidence and to encourage them to try new activities even though they are new and have no experience in the newly found activity. The trend for participation trophies is hard to pinpoint but people are saying, “that it spiked during the second half of the twenty century” (Aaron Stern). Mr. Stern continued to explain that the trophies were once used for struggling community, and taught the kids that they were valued and to remember that fact. The problem facing society now, is whether or not participation trophies are doing the opposite of what they were intended for. In a New York Times piece, four debaters take on the situation of whether the trophies are hurting or benefitting our
There is a misconception that competition is bad, if a child can experience the thrill of winning and the disappointment of losing, they will be well equipped for the reality of life. Competition provides stimulation to achieve a goal; to have determination, to overcome challenges, to understand that hard work and commitment leads to a greater chance of success. Life is full of situations where there are winners and losers; getting a job; a sports game; not getting into a desired college. People need to learn how to cope with disappointment and then to look forward to the next opportunity to try again. Competition also teaches us to dig deep and find abilities we never knew we had. The pressure to win or succeed can often inspire more imaginative thinking and inspire us to develop additional
i did track and Field for 3 years straight, and every year i used to get upset about this, how everyone gets a trophy at the end of the season, despite their amount of effort they put in . Stanford University psychologist Carol Dweck has "said our society has gone overboard in giving kids praise, particularly when it focuses on an innate ability - “you’re smart” or “you’re a natural at this sport” - rather than on effort."(The Mercury News. 25 Sept. 2015, www.mercurynews.com/2015/09/25/should-kids-in-sports-get-trophies-for-just-participating/.)