Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Fantasy vs reality
It is highly debatable whether one can experience true raw emotion when engaging with fictions. Whether in the form of a film, novel, play or any known fiction, it is evident that most people develop an emotional response and are affected by a multitude of scenarios including ones that provoke fear, excitement, heartbreak, and grief. It is undeniable that as humans, most people develop an emotional response when engaging in fictions, but whether these emotional responses are real and rational is uncertain. Through analyzing the paradox of fiction and each of its three premises, and evaluating various theories presented by Colin Radford, Kendall Walton, and Noel Carroll on the validity of emotional responses whilst engaging in fiction we are …show more content…
Sainsbury (2010) on the “paradox of fiction” begin to generate the paradoxical assumption that our emotional responses to fiction are irrational. Firstly, in order to experience and express real emotions such as anger, happiness, frustration, excitement, etc. relevant belief is required. Such that one must truly believe the persons or scenarios presented existed at one point or another, for example one can only experience fear if what is being presented is truly perceived as threatening or dangerous. Radford (1975) supports this premise in arguing that our ability to become emotionally engaged and connected to fictional characters and scenarios is irrational, incoherent and inconsistent. For example, Radford explains “it is not only seeing a man’s torment that torments us, it is also, as we say, the thought of his torment which torments, or upsets, or moves us,” such that if we truly believed someone was in danger we may interject or intervene (1975, p. 68). However, while watching a film in a cinema we may experience feelings of angst or anger in witnessing a woman being attacked in an alleyway, yet while we are moved by such a setting, it does not influence one to jump up and call the police or interject and stop the film to save the
Jonathan Gottschall in his article,'' Why fiction is good for you ,'' he begins with question in his article is fiction good for us ? as it's known we spend most of time in our life by read novels , watching films , tv shows and other . Most of these things may affect us in a positive or negative way . Jonathan in his article show us that '' fiction seems to be more effective at changing beliefs than nonfiction, which is designed to persuade through argument and evidence through studies that show us when we read nonfiction, we read with our shields up. We are critical and skeptical. But when we are absorbed in a story, we drop our intellectual guard '' ( Gottschall 3) . He also states in conclusion,'' Reading narrative fiction allows one
Everyday we observe people’s contrasting opinions. Whether it be in politics, school, or in one’s personal life, emotions are often a major factor when it comes to expressing one’s ideas. In writing, an audience must be aware this, and decide for themselves if an author is being bias or equally representing all sides to a situation. In both Into the Wild and In Cold Blood, the authors form distinct opinions about their main characters and believe family structure heavily influenced their future.
The paragraph above does show how the readers’ emotions are in turmoil because of the sort of double standard created when the story is t...
Everyday is a challenge and we experience things that we like and we don’t like. There are things we always want to leave behind and move forward; however, we cannot. As humans if we are told not to do something, we want to try it anyway to see the outcome. In the same manner, if we are told about a movie being scary we go out of our comfort zone to experience it and then later be frightened. Stephen T.Asma mentions,“Monsters can stand as symbols of human vulnerability and crisis, and as such they play imaginative foils for thinking about our own responses to mence” (62). When we watch horror movies, we force ourselves to imagine the wrong and undesirable. These thoughts in our head cause us to believe that our own obstacles are likely to cause a threat or danger to ourselves. In the same manner, horror movies can be represented as obstacles in our life that we don’t want to go through and we do it anyway to feel good about our own situations that they are not as bad as others. Stephen King also depicts, “We also go to re-establish our feelings of essential normality; the horror movie is innately conservative, even reactionary.”(King 16). Horror movies may put us in a mindset where we feel safe and more comfortable with our own situations but explore our options in worse situations. It gives us an example of what people did in their fright time and how we should confront each and every
While fiction deals with things, people and situations which have never existed, it may very well be inspired by real factual data. A history professor might recommend his students to use a fictional novel in order to get better insight regarding a situation. History records facts, not feelings. Fiction might present feelings and therefore allow the history student to understand the impact of happenings and to grasp the humanity which lies behind the factual data. Chatos story might be fictional, yet it is safe to assume that many Chatos have really existed and still exist. Statistic data and factual recordings may be insightful, that being said we might state that fiction serves history as an emotional
To begin, I will give a brief overview on the effect emotions have on our media viewing experience. In particular, I will be examining the work of Noem Carroll and Carl Plantinga. Second, I will give a brief overview of the research that connects political humor viewing to positive outcomes including increased political knowledge, and the ability to learn various view points as well as greater understanding of one’s own viewpoint. Though, I understand that their is a raging debate between cognitivist and non-cognitivist. My goal is not to take a position on the debate, but I am merely going to give a brief overview of the literature on film and emotion. On one hand, Carl Plantinga argues that emotions can be defined as "Concern Based Construals.” To highlight this meaning, let us imagine that as I am writing this paper, I hear loud noises, as this is going on, unconsciously, my heart rate increases and respiration increase and I begin to develop the emotion of fear. This is similar to Noel Carroll’s theory of emotion, if not complimentary to Plantinga’s view. Carroll would say that emotions act as searchlights to help us focus on the perceptions necessary to deal with the current experience. Plantinga would concede that many of the affects associated with emotions occur in the cognitive unconscious. So, Plantinga is not saying that, “Emotions are mere judgements,” As Robert Solomon would claim, but emotions are driven by experience based on one’s personal perception. In other words, Plantinga is saying the these construals are based on one’s personal experiences, whether conscious or not. However, something should be said about Construals in of itself, th...
Have you ever been plunged into a book, where your emotions are being drug around into real world problems, enabling you to understand life’s difficulties and empathize with others? According to “Perrine’s Literature Structure, Sound & Sense” by Greg Johnson, Thomas Arp, and Laurence Perrine, this is exactly what literary fiction does. “Literary fiction, however, is written by someone with serious artistic intentions who hopes to broaden, deepen and sharpen the reader’s awareness of life (Johnson).” Literary fiction can be observed through the story “Hunters in the Snow” by Tobias Wolff, as the text is throwing your emotions around through suspense, revealing new information that
The mix of emotions has been evident throughout the course of the play. Not only is this healthy confusion beneficial, but it is imperative to the success of the literary works as a whole. Just as Troy Maxson demonstrates, humans are made up of an array of contrasting emotions. Conflicting emotions can often be confusing, but in the end they often lead to a profound
Owens and Sawhill use pathos to evoke the feelings of their readers. This method establishes
Film and literature are two media forms that are so closely related, that we often forget there is a distinction between them. We often just view the movie as an extension of the book because most movies are based on novels or short stories. Because we are accustomed to this sequence of production, first the novel, then the motion picture, we often find ourselves making value judgments about a movie, based upon our feelings on the novel. It is this overlapping of the creative processes that prevents us from seeing movies as distinct and separate art forms from the novels they are based on.
'Once upon a time' is undoubtedly the traditional way to start a story, likewise how “happily ever after” generically finishes one. However, I have found that my interest lies between these lines, watching how a story emotionally engages a reader. Literature enhances reality, embarking readers on a personal journey where we genuinely talk to the characters, feel the setting, and believe the narrator. It feels so real that we let ourselves get lost within it. It was my extensive reading into both my A-level material and classics like Russell’s ‘Blood Brothers’ that sparked my desire to develop these ideas further at university and enhance my writing ability.
Relations between sympathy-empathy expressiveness and fiction have become a significant issue in the debate on the emotional responses to the film fiction. Due to their complexity many scholars found it useful to diagram them. With his essay, “Empathy and (Film) Fiction”, Alex Neill tries to develop new theory for analyzing the fiction and, especially, the emotional responses from the audience on it. The project of this essay is represented with an aim to show the audience the significant value of the emotional responses to the film fiction. From my point of view in the thesis of his project he asks a simple question: “Why does the (film) fiction evoke any emotions in the audience?”, further building the project in a very plain and clever way. Tracing the origins of this issue, he distinguishes between two types of emotional responses, sympathy and empathy, as separate concepts in order to understand the influence of both types of emotional responses to fiction. However, relying mostly on this unsupported discrepancy between two concepts and the influence of the “identification” concept, Neill finds himself unable to trace sympathy as a valuable response to fiction. This difficulty makes Neill argue throughout the better part of the text that empathy is the key emotional factor in the reaction to (film) fiction and that it is a more valuable type of emotional response for the audience.
reader to feel many emotions and forces the reader to question his or her own
Reader-Response theories propose that works of literature exist in a mutual relationship between the reader and author. The meaning that a reader extracts from a text is a simultaneous result of both the author’s intent, and the reader’s interpretation of it (Roberts, 149). With this theory, there is an inherent subjectivity associated with the analysis of any work of literatur. An author may have a specific meaning to the story but another person can read the story and create his or her own interpretation that is just as meaningful as the author’s original ideas. Put another way, meani...
Movies are a great version of storytelling because they make stories more relatable and memorable. Storytelling is one of the most powerful capabilities humans possess. It can be used to motivate, dominate, and influence people. The scope and power of storytelling has grown immensely from its roots in stories told over the campfire. It now covers every dimension of human emotion and endeavor. This makes stories incredibly relatable and influential in that one can relate to the emotions that are being depicted and can, if wanted to, be influenced by the decision the character made. Before movies were invented, people relied on speaking and “the written word” to hear stories. Each person visualized the story’s characters, sets, and actions differently. Moviemakers have moved a step further in the way of storytelling. They take it upon themselves to physically set up the sets, give faces to the characters, and sh...