Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ignorance in society essay
The importance of knowledge
Factors affecting the educational system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ignorance in society essay
Ignorance is the lack of knowledge or knowing. Being ignorant is being in denial, dumb, oblivious. Choosing to only learn about a certain part of something but not the rest. Being ignorant is to lack the knowledge of something. Ignorance is everywhere. Nobody knows everything there is that the world has to give us. We just know what we know until this point in our lives because we find it or because it is introduced to us by something or someone else. Just because everyone is ignorant does not necessarily mean that we are all dumb. Some people are smarter than others because they are more advanced on certain subjects or topics. Ignorance can be used to manipulate others that are not so knowledgeable of certain topics. It can be used to manipulate …show more content…
Ignorance can definitely be abused by anybody because you can confuse others, or you can manipulate to get something that you want because the other person doesn't have the other piece of information that you have. People often get angry when it comes to ignorance because to most people it means that others have a specific way of thinking, that they are close minded. It is used in everyday life to learn more. Everyday we learn something different. Usually with ignorance in mind it provokes anger because a lot of people today are ignorant in a way where they choose to keep their mindset to keep thinking a certain way rather than changing it to learn something more. It corrupts us by staying on the same level of knowledge, by not letting your brain expand to its capacity with several things that will be necessary one day. It attacks everyone because since everyone is different not everyone will understand you because they were taught differently. It can be prevented by teaching more and being able to want to accept new knowledge in rather than staying stuck. It is a common thing because it’s everywhere. Ignorance is given because there's just so much knowledge so we either mix things up or maybe the way we are raised we are only taught certain parts of
The paper titled “White Ignorance” written by Charles Milles talks about ignorance within the white race and how it is a multidimensional entity; it’s mentioned there should be a sociology of ignorance. The boundaries for what is deemed as white ignorance is laid out in the paper. These boundaries serve as reminders to the reader that ignorance is not limited to only white people, and that not all whites are ignorant. White ignorance builds itself beyond refutation, to the point where anything outside the ordinary norms of white supremacy over other races is ignored. Writers seeking to expose the blindness that comes with this type of ignorance have come up with examples to try to show their point of view. One such writer by the name of Herman Melville wrote a novel called Benito Cerono, in
We as humans tend to have an unquenchable thirst for knowledge. We look for knowledge about everybody and everything that surrounds us in our day-to-day life. Sadly though, we must accept that in the grand scheme of life we (as a society) tend to put pleasure above our quest for knowledge. The pursuit of knowledge tends to take time and energy, two things we call invaluable, and it also shows us things that might depress us. Contrastingly, ignorance takes no time and energy.
Knowledge helps people make conclusions, lets them be skillful, smart, and keeps them aware. People gather knowledge through experience, whether it's from school, mistakes, witnessing a situation, or trying new activities out. Including in “Fahrenheit 451”, the author, Ray Bradbury does an amazing job in explaining and describing to his audience of how society results in a setting without reasonable amounts of knowledge. People in the society of “Fahrenheit 451” begin to lose common sense after the books are prohibited to keep. In the novel 451 Ray Bradbury warns the audience that without knowledge people are manipulated easily. In reality knowledge is the key to surviving.
“Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives” ~ James Madison
Linda Alcoff utilizes “Epistemologies of Ignorance: Three Types,” enhances previous work already performed within feminist epistemology and elaborate a typology of ignorance’s. She proposes that there are three types of epistemologies of ignorance’s, the situation of knowers, the perception of viewpoint epistemology, and the third is a universal type. Knowledge and expertise that is known or unknown is utilized to provide a distinction between the powerful and the powerless. Alcoff also claims that traditional epistemology should not be used when assessing ignorance due to it being insufficiently reflexive. Alcoff view closely mirrors my own therefore this is not a critical argument but a concurring viewpoint enhancing her argument.
So, my question is, to what extent are we responsible for our ignorance. According to Aristotle, it seems that the ignorance must be related to specific circumstances over which the person had no control. For example, a person is not responsible for getting a friend some food that made him sick because he did not know that the food was
Ignorance is a lack of knowledge. People are so set on their ideas they set in the past, that they do not want to face the present or future. People that are racist and prejudice are ignorant. Ignorance is passed on and spread, therefore there will always be a person in America who are ignorant, and we will never achieve racial equality. Martin
Albert Einstein once said “A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. So is a lot.” Knowledge can be good because it makes one successful. Then, it can also be very bad such as a criminal being too smart for the police, he or she can keep committing crime. Too much knowledge is dangerous because it may harm many, which means that many die or get scarred for life because of one simple guy with an excess of knowledge.
In today’s society many technological advances have contributed to advanced communication. While these are advantageous and can improve communication across the globe, they have become a hindrance to critical thinking. With the advancement of technology throughout the world human beings are able to think less while still “functioning.” Literacy is thrown to the wayside and texting “lingo” runs rampant. Why read a book when you can watch the movie? Students are becoming less interested in language, reading, and writing and more involved with surfing the web for answers. This shift in the value of literacy opens the world up to many dangers that if not confronted and demolished could lead to a society unable to think for themselves.
"Anthem" by Ayn Rand portrays these sentiments. Within the book people are purposefully maintianed ignorant. Limiting knowledge would not create this society. It would only prevent the destruction of humanity.The limitation of knowledge would only be applied to extreme cases. Sciences relating life should remain elisive and vague. Such as the search for the Elixir of life. If only extreme searches for knowlegde are limited then society will continue progressing. It will not regress as drastically as
Ignorance is bliss as one who is ignorant does not fully understand all the issues occurring around him or her and is therefore somewhat innocent to them. In “Revelation”, by Flannery O’Conner, the main character Mrs. Turpin is ignorant of the fact she is the same as everyone else, but she has different classifications of people of which she is of the higher category. O’Connor uses “Revelation” as a tool to represent people who are both ignorant and not ignorant and what it almost takes for some people to fully overcome ignorance.
The free dictionary online defines knowledge as “an awareness, consciousness, or familiarity gained by experience or learning”. Power, on the other hand, means “the ability or official capacity of a person, group or nation to exercise great influence or control and authority over others”. In Voltaire’s “Candide”, Goethe’s “Faust”, and Shelley’s Frankenstein, the quest for more knowledge and power sets the stage for the story yet the characters, Candide, Frankenstein, and Faust remain unhappy after acquiring the much desired knowledge and power. It can be said, therefore, that knowledge, and even money, often times twists and corrupts the mind because of the control (power) it gives people over others.
As we entered the new millennium, Edward Said’s article, “The Clash of Ignorance”, appeared in the October 22 edition of The Nation, in 2001. His paper was a critical response to my thesis which first appeared in 1993, “The Clash of Civilizations?”. The following years saw many adopting his argument as a valid counter to my thesis. However, I believe that his argument builds more to the notion of the clash of civilizations stated in my paper, strengthening it, rather than weakening it. In this paper, I will discuss and address the arguments that he had put forward.
But when we consider ignorance along with agnosticism which is a mode of the intellective process, there is an obvious contradiction. Because ignorance is not just mere lack of a knowing, conversely, every ignorance is always a process of being ignorant of something quite precise. In other words, one who ignores knows in a particular form what it is that he ignores. For example, a person who has no knowledge on economics is not ignorant of what a Cobb-Douglas equation is, because he lacks information to such equations. Only the man who is told about Cobb-Douglas equations, and does not know what we are talking about because he does not understand the meaning of the words, only then is this man ignorant of what a Cobb-Douglas equation is.
Philosophy is defined as the love of wisdom and queen of the sciences. It is a field that relies on critical thinking to more thoroughly understand life, the nature of the mind, and even that which is beyond the physical, referred to as the metaphysical. This philosophical love of wisdom and sense of critical thinking is not evident in the character Cypher in The Matrix, who asserts that “ignorance is bliss.” Ignorance is the opposite of critical thinking. In one part of the movie, while eating a steak, Cypher states, “You know, I know this steak doesn't exist. I know that when I put it in my mouth, the Matrix is telling my brain that it is juicy