Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Climate change debate
Climate change debate
Debating topics global warming
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Climate change debate
Reflection on the Papal Address to Congress
Taylor Bernosky
Monmouth University
Abstract
This paper reflects on the papal address to congress focusing on the Pope’s concern for climate change. The article used will relate the ethics and politics of climate change in relation to the papal visit. The paper will then relate that article to the readings and topics discussed in our Scientific/Political Climate Change course.
Reflection on the Papal Address to Congress During Pope Francis’s visit to the United States, he addressed a joint session of Congress. In his speech he touched on some of the current topics in American politics such as abortion and same-sex marriage. He talked about them in such a way that he did not refer to the topics by name, but related the context to them. However, the one topic that he did refer to specifically was climate change. When referring to climate change he said that Congress has a very important role. He said that there needs to be an effort to redirect
…show more content…
It is very scary that there are representatives elected into Congress that reject climate change or its degree of severity, and won’t listen to the scientists who have dedicated their research to this problem. Even some of those who do believe about climate change to a degree, say that it is too expensive of a problem to handle or that we shouldn’t worry about our country instead we should be worried about China who is more of an offender. This relates to the “Up and down with ecology – the “issue-attention cycle” “ article that we went over in class; in that once people discuss the cost of something it deters people’s interest (Downs, 1972). This is what some of the Republicans in Congress are trying to do – take the focus off of climate change by saying that it is too costly or deflecting the
Many people’s opinions are influenced by political leaders and their beliefs, which can have a negative effect on science’s efforts. Mere word changes have shown to make a difference in people’s willingness to pay for taxes that they don’t necessarily support or are even aware of. The use of storytelling has shown to be a powerful means in communicating science to the public as well. Although education and science understanding are not directly correlated with the acceptance of climate science, there is evidence that shows that a brief explanation of greenhouse effects “enhance acceptance across the political spectrum”. Researching source credibility has also boosted the political acceptance of certain scientific information.
Climate Change is costing the world millions of dollars and is the biggest issue facing society today. Climate change is causing greenhouse gases to build up, ice caps to melt, etc. Some people believe climate change is not a big issue. For instance in the article “Gospel of The Climate Change Deniers” it is stated, “Barton a guy who called Al Gore ‘totally wrong’ about global warming and advised people to get shade to adapt to rising temperatures” (Kroll). Although, this is an appealing mindset, it is illogical because climate change has many more effects than just warmer temperatures. For example, Frank Ackerman: an economist known for his work in environmental economics and Dr. Elizabeth A. Stanton an environmental economist and
Mr. Gore’s speech was given in New York University on September 18, 2006 to bring awareness to the issue. Al Gore uses scientific background and research to persuade the audience by appealing to pathos, logos, and ethos used by his esoteric diction that contributes to the consequential tone to create an effective argument for global warming.
Climate Change has become an incredibly controversial topic because of the bid to win votes. As with any successful political party, capital and supporters are needed to fund and support campaigns and activities to secure votes. The Democratic and Republican parties have taken opposite sides of the ring regardless of scientific proof. In relation to global warming, the Democrats represent the environmentalists in the green corner and the Republicans represent the current energy tycoons in the red corner. The two opposing parties are simply trying to one up each other with each rhetorical combination thrown. The more irrational or misconstrued the rhetoric, the more the crowd rooting for each fighter reacts and the more independents rally to
One of the most controversial topics of today that affects the entire globe is climate change. Climate change is the change in global or regional climate patterns, which is greatly attributed to the increasing levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide produced by the use of fossil fuels. The video, “Climate Change 101” with Bill Nye, by National Geographic and the article, “Climate Threat to Wildlife May Have Been Massively Underreported”, written by Kacey Dreamer, do a fantastic job at bringing forth this controversial affair and how it is a huge issue, by which greatly effects the environment and the wild life on this planet. Both the article and video, on climate change, are very effective at expressing their argument by effectively using the
On Thursday May 7th Pope Francis and the Catholic Church had announced that they would forgive anyone how has had aborted. However still sticking to the belief that abortion is a sin Pope Francis and the Vatican bid on this to catch up with modern times. He would be sending out his Missionaries of mercy to pardon any women how have aborted a child. In addition to that he would also be reaching out to the doctors and the nurses who help perform abortions. Which will start in the so called Holy Year of Mercy which will be acknowledged on December 8, 2015 through November 20,215. However some think doing this would cause misperception among the Catholic community. But, others like Italy’s Cardinal Velasio de Paolis has said he’s the pope of mercy
As such, Pope Francis discussed the issues of global warming and climate change which he describes as “… a global problem with serious implications, environmental, social, economic, political and for the distribution of goods; it represents one of the principal challenges facing humanity in our day.” By the same token, Pope Francis mentioned of the loss of biodiversity and issues regarding water-related resources. He conferred about the former as an impending concern, due to the fact that these creatures are being exploited as mere “resources”, contrary to their intrinsic value as the creatures of the Earth. In addition to the aforementioned statements, Pope Francis also raised the issue of the prevalence of weak responses to the recurring dilemma that our common home is facing as of the moment. Accordingly, he expressed his deep concern towards this issue. Furthermore, He professed that although there has been many efforts contributed by the sciences to resolve man-made problems, there has been a decline in terms of changing bad habits and eradicating lavish lifestyles which could are also factors that affect the current condition of our
For these reasons, global warming stands as one of the most daunting policy issues facing our world today. This is compounded by the debate over the very existence of climate change. While countless sources of empirical evidence testify to the very real presence of climate change the world over, considerable denial of the phenomenon still exists. The argument has been made that evidence about climate change is a gross overstatement, or in some cases, a complete fabrication. Despite the evidence to the contrary, many interest groups with considerable political clout have successfully perpetuated the argument that documented changes in the environment are a product of natural cyclical changes in climate, and are not associated with human activities. However, even the acceptance of this particular brand of reality is no grounds for the disregard of environmental consciousness. Even if one accepts the premise that recent climate change is not resultant of human activity, the rationale behind environmental conservation remains ...
Climate change is the main topic of this Encyclical. Climate change is portrayed in a way that reflects the current scientific consensus today. Hans Joachim Schellenhuber, a leading climate scientist, was a scientific adviser to the Pope while writing Laudato Si’.
The modern Papacy goes far beyond just religion. The Pope is also a political figure with the power to sway key events in the world. Oftentimes, religion and politics mix and therefore it becomes the duty of the Pope to give guidance to world’s Catholics. Pope Pius XI, in 1924, told students in Italy that the Pope is not to be politically neutral. He said, “When Politics come near the Altar, then Religion, the Church, the Pontiff have not only the right but the duty to give directions and indications to be followed by Catholics."
The audience can be persuaded through their emotion (Cockcroft and Cockcroft, 2005). High pathos makes the audience more likely to be persuaded (Dlugan, 2007b). On the one hand, in this speech, Leonardo invoked the fear of audience by quoting the scientific community’s prognosis, ‘If we do not act together, we will surely perish’. Later in the speech, he listed the specific actions and asked the leaders for action. He also cited the statement of the chief of the US navy, ‘climate change is our single greatest security threat’, which also trigger the fear of the audience. On the other hand, Dicaprio said solving this crisis is not a question of politics, but our moral obligation, which can inspire a strong sense of responsibility and mission. Through triggering audience emotion, Dicaprio can make his audience act together and face the crisis of climate
Closer: I hope everyone realizes our climate change and can help slow down the process. We can all take action today, small steps add up, if we all do our parts in cleaning up our planet.
Similar to St. Benedict, the Pope refers how climate change impacts humans and species. One statement he states in verse forty-four
but it’s opposition arises from politics, not science. Undoubtedly, the media is a major influence in the dilemma. The democratic links between mass opinion and policy allow a conspiracy-believing public to steer policy away from addressing climate change (Douglas & Sutton, 2015).
The Earth is currently locked in perpetuating spiral of climate change. While the global climate has unarguably been changing since the dawn of it's manifestation, the once steadied ebb and flow of climate change has become increasingly more unpredictable.The risk of rising sea levels, and drought plaguing the fresh water supply, during the time that flooding and sporadic storm conditions turn once fully inhabited regions into uninhabitable death traps. Climate change catalyzed by human's increased production of carbon dioxide, is more noticeable than ever in our recorded history (United States, 2014 National Climate Assessment). Thankfully however, with the changing weather conditions due to carbon related emissions, the change in public opinion about their personalized influence on climate change is also increasing. Kevin Liptak Jethro Mullen, and Tom Cohen note that In reaction to the most recent governmental report on climate change, even the U.S. government believes that a stronger approach needs to be taken to correct our self-generated cataclysm.