Progression of the paleo diet The paleo diet is based off of how the pre-historic humans were thought to eat thousands of years ago. There diet consisted of meat, fish, poultry, fruits and vegetables. The diet avoids anything that pre-historic people did not have available to them. Although this diet does not meet the substantial amount of carbohydrates recommended by the government ("Paleo Diet - US News Best Diets"). The prehistoric people were still able to get the nutrients they needed to thrive and survive. The paleo diet was beneficial to the prehistoric people motivating growth and development into the culture, creatures and community known today ("Paleo Diet - US News Best Diets"). Altercations in the paleo diet practiced today. Of …show more content…
course there is no way to exactly replicate the way the prehistoric people ate. Their food was not polluted with genetically mortified organisms (GMOs), also some of the plants and animals gathered and consumed by pre-historic people have gone extinct. If the cavemen didn’t eat it then it is restricted from the diet. This being said, the prehistoric people had no dairy, sugars, coffee, or most of the conveniences known today. In some cases it is not possible for an individual to get the proper nutrients on the paleo diet with out supplementing vitamins. The prehistoric people did not have access to vitamins so there would be a breach in the diet. Most vitamins also contain high amounts of genetically modified organisms. The paleo advocates claim that sticking to the hunting and gathering method. Animal protein and plants are essential for human development ("Paleo Diet - US News Best Diets"). Nutrition for the Paleo diet does not correspond to government regulations.
That however does not mean that the diet does not provide necessary nutrients. Not every person can be classified under these regulations but it is a good system to get an idea of what one should be eating. Less is more; on average Americans surpass the recommended 2,300 milligrams of sodium. If one is of African-American decent or has hypertension, diabetes or chronic kidney disease, the recommended amount plummets to 1,500 milligrams ("Paleo Diet - US News Best Diets"). The paleo diet calls for no added salt, seeing that the pre-historic people had no access to salt or pepper shakers. Fat is a different story. On average on being on the paleo diet one consumes about thirty-nine percent from fat. The amount suggested by the government ranges from ten percent to thirty-five percent. Protein is on the higher end of the scale, averaging to be around thirty-eight percent being taken in on the diet. Again the government recommends around ten to thirty-five percent. This diet is very low in carbs, seeing that the foliage prehistoric people had available to them was usually difficult to digest. The average paleo diet consumes about twenty-three percent of daily calories from carbohydrates. According to the government forty-five to sixty-five percent of calories eaten a day should be from carbohydrates ("Paleo Diet - US News Best …show more content…
Diets"). Eastern Africa is thought to be the origination of the prehistoric humans. The earliest human remains were found at the Lake Turkana, Rift, Valley, Omo River part of Ethiopia and Tanzania. The remains date back 200,000 years (Sisson). Some food that was available in Eastern Africa 200,000 years ago may sound pretty familiar. The Rift Valley is home to many fresh water fish and shell fish. These animal food sources were essential for brain development. Docosahexaenoic and arachidonic acids are fatty acids that are present in early infant brain development. There are still women today eating fish from the Rift Valley. Studies show that their breast milk is rich in DHA and AA, which are omega-3 fatty acids that help improve pregnancy and early infancy outcomes (Sisson). Much of the first human’s nutrients came from aquatic animal sources of food. Although prehistoric people of Eastern African did not eat as many carbohydrates that America finds necessary today, they still got plenty of nutrients to thrive in the Rift Valley (Sisson). Once pre-historic people started to migrate away from the Rift Valley they still had to find nutrients elsewhere. Having access to large mammals and wild foliage was a major advantage to the migration. Although they faced issues of new illness. They soon harnessed fire, a tool that benefited human life in many ways throughout history. Before they had learned to cook their food, it was much harder to digest. There are also many different kinds of bacteria and parasites that can be distributed through raw meat. Bacteria and parasites can cause severe sickness and even death. With modern medicine in play, today viruses and bacterial infections still run rampant. An easy way to avoid the microscopic vermin is by applying heat. The discovery of fire as a tool assisted in longer life span and healthier pre-historic human guts. Raw food was also hard on the digestive system. The art of cooking has benefited both culture and the human body. By cooking the meat and foliage, digestion was much easier because when food heats up the partials expand and are easier to tear apart. Digestion now took up less energy; therefor prehistoric people did not have to spend as much energy hunting for food. Prehistoric people did not use as much energy digesting their food, so their need for calories were reuced. This causes them not to have to eat as much to sustain life. They could now save food for later. Eastern Africa climate is typically very hot, not the greatest for refrigeration of meat. The prehistoric people eventually developed a method of natural refrigeration. They would take the extra meat they had obtained, wrap it in leaves, and burry the meat about three feet deep next to a river bank. The substantial difference in temperature was enough to keep the meat edible for three to five days. The less work that the prehistoric people had to do the better off they were in the long run. Extra time gave prehistoric people an opportunity to exercise their brains ("HowStuffWorks "Eating Raw Meat: Bacteria and Parasites""). Human diets have always consisted of animal sources of food. Before humans learned to hunt and gather, they scavenged. Prehistoric humans would eat what ever caught their eye. They eventually moved on to killing small animals. Collectively evolving their hunting methods, they began to hunt cooperatively (Larsen). Hunting in groups made it possible to score larger animals, which means more meat (Larsen). Access to more food made it possible for the prehistoric humans to grow larger in size (Larsen). The manic change in diet caused the prehistoric people to change their way of life. They consumed less meat and relied mostly on domesticated grains. Farming also made it possible to stay in one place for longer periods of time. Along with eating less meat and more grains the result was a decline of health, such as poor dental health, increased iron deficiency, and increased bone loss (Larsen). This shows how essential the Paleo diet was to the prehistoric people. If a decline of health had occurred earlier, the world would be substantially different. Farming moved the pre-historic people toward the future. With their brains being slightly more developed learning flourished. If the pre-historic humans had eaten like the average American, there would have been too many health problems to make progress in life. Organic meat was essential source of key vitamins and minerals that the pre historic people needed. While farming grains may have caused health problems they were still an asset to human development (Larsen). The key to the prehistoric people’s diet was that they did not have genetically modified organisms that are in almost everything we consume today. Genetically modified organisms are commonly known as (GMOs), they are also in most food that Americans consume. If crops or livestock contain any kind of genetically modified organisms the substance is considered not to be organic ("Organic Foods: Understanding Organic Food Labels, Benefits, and Claims"). For a food to be considered organic it must follow specific guide lines. Organic crops must be grown in soil that contains no chemicals. If the soil has any modifications then it is ruled out of being organic ("Organic Foods: Understanding Organic Food Labels, Benefits, and Claims"). These organic crops must also be grown separate from genetically modified crops because of cross pollination. Bees can carry pollen of a genetically modified crop to an organic crop. Once the bee transfers the contaminated pollen, the once organic crop and the bee are both considered inorganic. As for livestock, they must be fed organic grass or given organic feed. They also must not be given any sort of steroids, growth hormones, or antibiotics. Any food that follows these guide lines are considered organic and are allowed to be labeled so. Organic foods are rich in antioxidants and are shown to be more beneficial than food grown with GMOs. One who has allergies corresponding to foods, chemicals or preservatives tend to decrease when following an organic diet ("Organic Foods: Understanding Organic Food Labels, Benefits, and Claims"). Effects of Genetically modified organisms on humans are uncertain. However the use of GMOs on conventional meat is known to strengthen antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria. When a bacteria strain becomes antibiotic-resistant, the bacteria is capable of fighting off the antibiotics ("Organic Foods: Understanding Organic Food Labels, Benefits, and Claims"). In some cases the bacteria can use the antibiotic as a tool to spread its self throughout the specimen. This gives organically raised livestock much more logical and responsible. While GMO livestock promotes the risk of infectious diseases such as mad cow disease. Organic live stock is clean and is a better option for people with food allergies. In addition to not being injected with extra hormones, organic livestock are raised like they would live in the wild. Allowing animals to roam freely opposed to being held in small cages is much more responsible. Raising animals this way alone help keeps the animals naturally healthy ("Organic Foods: Understanding Organic Food Labels, Benefits, and Claims"). Majority of foods Americans consume today have been grown using pesticides.
Pesticides can be absorbed from the outside of the produce to the inside of the skin. If one does not eat completely organic, there is no way to stay completely away from consuming chemicals. Pesticides also contaminate drinking water. Run off water from farms using pesticides contaminate rivers and have the potential to infiltrate drinking water supplies ("Assessing Health Risks from Pesticides | Pesticides | US EPA"). A simple way to avoid this is to filter your water a few extra times before you consume it. Scientists know more about the effect pesticides have on people than the effects GMOs do. This evidence is due to worker exposer. People who apply pesticides such as vegetable and fruit pickers. The Environmental Protection Agency known as the EPA, evaluates exposure workers have to chemicals. The EPA only registers chemicals that are shown to be safe if used properly. There are different ways to be exposed to pesticide, inhalation exposure, dermal exposure, and oral exposure. Testing is typically preformed on animals by pesticide companies in independent laboratories. While testing pesticides the EPA looks for a wide range of side effects such as eye and skin irritation to birth defects and cancer. The Federal Government also regulates pesticides, “to ensure that they do not pose unreasonable risk to human health or the environment.” ("Assessing Health Risks from Pesticides | Pesticides | US
EPA"). Genetics have a lot to do with diet. While we may not be exactly genetically the same as prehistoric people, we still have the same genetic bases. We have adapted to specific cultures and climates. Society today is adapting to GMOs and chemicals (Bryner). Although the effect of chemicals on future generations could be catastrophic. GMO infused foods are able to last longer. Being able to store food for longer periods of time could be very beneficial to solving hunger. The controversy of whether or not it is just to alter food. Some see it as “playing god” others see it as an opportunity to solve an everlasting problem. Science is progressing rampantly so the possibilities are endless. The study of genetic material is flourishing. Scientists can take a sample of a person’s blood, run it through a machine and see that person’s specific genetic make-up. Being able to look at a human’s genetic make-up will help doctors study a wide range of diseases. Knowing the chances of having a disease could make one take extra precautions to avoid it. A simple diet change could help one ward off a disease such as diabetes without ever having to go any kind of treatment ("GMO versus NON GMO - The Shocking Corn Comparison - Underground Health"). A major problem in America is obesity. Many people over eat, eat junk food, or do not exercise. Seth Doane states in his article “Battling Obesity in America” that, three out of every four children are either overweight or obese.” Being overweight automatically increases ones chance of disease by sixty percent. By simply eating a well-balanced diet and exercising, many of America’s health problems would be greatly reduced. My personal experience with weight loss was life changing. I had been obese most of my life, finally I decided it was time for a change my freshman year of high school. Changing the way one eats is changing the way that one lives. From my freshman year in high school to my junior year I had lost forty pounds. I chose to eliminate meat from my diet at first. I avoided refined sugars and drank only water. The human body becomes addicted to having sugar and too much fatty foods. Going cold turkey off of everything made me sick. The human body can detoxify itself from all of the substances that are not needed. For that to happen the person must stop putting the toxins in their body. Going organic helps a lot in this process. Not having the extra chemicals makes it much easier for the body to heal itself.
Recently my brother started a modified Paleo diet. The Paleolithic diet claims to be based on the eating habits of Paleolithic humans during the Paleolithic era. For his own nutritional needs he has chosen to combine the Paleo diet and parts of the bulletproof diet created by Dr. David Perlmutter. He has been talking about how great his diet is and that he’s never felt better. My older sister Mar-y-sol argues that while the Paleo diet has some good ideas such as reducing the amount of processed wheat we consume (because the modern diet has far too much processed wheat) it is an out of balance diet and that it goes to the extreme. She prefers to eat a healthy balanced diet with everything in moderation or the omnivore’s ideal diet . These points of view seem valid so I decided to find out what makes a diet healthy.
As one of the newest, hottest diet trends to circulate around the United States, the Paleo Diet is essentially a high-protein, low-carb diet based on the speculated diets of our caveman ancestors. With its emphasis on poultry, lean meats, whole fruits and vegetables, as well as nuts but not grains, legumes, dairy, or anything refined or processed, the theory behind the diet is simple. As quoted by an online review by U.S. News & World Report: “if the cavemen didn’t eat it, you shouldn’t either.” Since our hunter-gatherer fore-bearers never had to eat the highly-processed, antibiotic-and-hormone-heavy food we eat today, they were much healthier, lived more active lives, and never suffered from the “disease of civilization” so many people in the U.S. and around the world deal with today.
The typical American diet is about 50% carbohydrate, 15% protein, and 35% fat, which is over the dietary guidelines for the amount of fat (below 30%), below the guidelines for carbohydrate (above 55%), and at the upper end of the guidelines for the amount of protein (below 15%) recommended in the diet. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_pattern_diet). Not only is the Standard American Diet completely lacking in terms of the quantity of macronutrients being consumed, but the quality of the foods that most Americans are eating is extremely poor as well. The Standard American Diet is high in animal fats, low in fiber, low in complex carbohydrates, and low in plant-based
has had an affected human health and native species. Being resistant to pesticide and herbicides, the plant’s DNA is split and combined with other DNA through genetic engineering, which is impossible in nature. Eating these genetically altered and processed foods can lead to increased risks of disease, cancer, and even death. Most of the time, we do not even know that we are eating these harmful toxins because they are infused with our foods. There are many farms in California that are able to grow just about anything due to the weather and fertile soil. Although we live in an area known for growing a diverse variety of food, GMOs are starting to, if they have not already, take over. Not only are these genetically modified foods dangerous to the environment but they also have a huge negative effect on animals and humans.
The Paleo food diet strives from the foundation of eating non-processed foods; instead, eating lean proteins, fruits and vegetables, and healthy fats are consisted in the diet. It is a belief that “if a caveman didn’t eat it, neither should you…” (Wolf 2017.) The diet also considers the way humans are genetically
All of these reasons might help explain the popularity of the Paleo Diet, they do not explain why it became popular when it did. One factor that might explain the timing of this fad is the rise of social media. Though Cordain’s book was released in 2002, the diet really took off in the late 2000s, by which time social media sites had become extremely popular. As previously discussed, Food preference has an important role as a signifier (Sahlins 1976, 169-172). This is especially true of the Paleo Diet, given that the chief benefits it offers over other diets is what it communicates about the participant to other members of society. Social media made it much easier for people to communicate these signals to a large group of people, as the person
Nutrition is a very controversial and confusing topic. One day coffee is bad for you, but the next day it is good. Alcohol is detrimental for our health one day, but the next day red wine is the elixir of life. There are dozens of diet plans and they promise a leaner and healthier body. There is the 3-Hour Diet that involves constantly eating small portions of anything we want to eat. The latest diet craze, the Paleo Diet, is based upon eating foods that our “hunter-gatherer ancestors” would have thrived on during the Paleolithic era. And there is the Blood Type Diet, the South Beach Diet, the Macrobiotic Diet, the Mediterranean Diet, and the list goes on. But who and what should we believe? Well, there is an optimal diet for humans and the answer might surprise many.
As compared to all the other fad diets out there, the Paleo Diet is one that is principled and based on ancient history which makes it absolutely unique. Also, this form of diet does not promote starvation or crash dieting; rather you are taught how to basically improve on your food choices to get the best results.
Yet, these two tests don't tell the whole story. While all this research shows that Neanderthals definitely consumed meat, the question is exactly how much of the diet could be comprised of meat. The issue of how much of the diet was comprised of plants is a much more difficult question, namely because plants contain very little protein compared to meats and therefore are almost negligible when being analyzed using isotope analysis. What this means to researchers is that the difference in nitrogen isotope levels between a diet of 50% meat and one consisting of 80% meat is almost negligible. This void of information has led to a greater discussion on the benefits and consequences of a high meat diet in
In 1985, scholars S. Boyd Eaton and Melvin J. Konner published a paper in the New England Journal of Medicine entitled ‘Paleolithic Nutrition’ that provided insight to he evolution of human nutritional requirements. Although...
As time has progressed, there has always been an overarching need for high amounts of crop production throughout the world. With the rapid rate of population growth, the need for crops and other sources of nutrients is only increasing. In order to meet these high demands and increase yields, farmers and other agriculturalists have started implementing the use of pesticides. These chemical mixtures are being used in order to prevent, destroy, repel or mitigate any pests from destroying growing crops. However, using pesticides on crops can create massive amounts of pollution, negatively affect an individual’s health, and can spark biodiversity loss within an ecosystem. According to Michael C.R. Alavanja, “Over 1 billion pounds of pesticides are used within the United States (US) each year and approximately 5.6 billion pounds are used worldwide”. With all this in mind, it is clear that pesticides should not be made available to farmers and agriculturalists, and should
Paleontology inspires an affluence of interest by the population about ancient life and helps all of us to know about our origins and how our world with humans came to be. According to the University of California Museum of Paleontology, paleontology is defined as the study of what fossils tell us about the ecologies of the past, about evolution, and about our place, as humans, in the world. Paleontology includes understanding from biology, geology, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, and even computer science to understand the activities that have led to the origination and ultimate destruction of the different types of organisms since life emerge. Paleontology is a prosperous subject, drenched with a long and interesting past and an even
In general, veganism is understood as eating strictly vegetables and abstaining from animal products altogether. Anthropologists believe, according to their studies of many human fossils around the world, that sixty five million years ago most humans ate mainly plant foods, being more likely gathers than hunters. In fact, the human digestive system resembles this early vegetarian condition from other plant-eaters in the coprolites and rudimentary tools discovered through archaeological findings at primitive human settlements. As climate changed, physical structure also changed: the discovery of fire and the increase of brain size modified diet to include meat products. These facts, argue proponents of banning animal products, illustrate that humans are not meant to be meat eaters.
They used every part of the animal they hunted for survival. However, now we have all kinds of clothing, housing, and are not constantly being hunted by other animals, so eating their meat is simply a luxury. Before man figured out how to hunt larger animals, plants and grains were consumed. This was not a drawback and man lived on fine. Going back to this lifestyle would transform the world into a cleaner place, and could help the world eventually obtain an organic lifestyle, which would be beneficial for the
This diet consists of: seafood, meats, fruits, vegetables and nuts. According to Loren Cordain, the author of The Paleo Diet, “The diet decreases the body’s glycemic load, expands the vitamin and nutrient consumption, has a healthy ratio of saturated and unsaturated fats, and consists of a good balance of fat, protein and carbohydrates.” (2). This diet is all about eating fresh foods and foods directly from nature. There are many things you cannot eat when you are on this diet. Some examples are: grains, dairy and processed food. Processed food is anything that comes in a jar, box or bag. I feel as if this diet is hard to stick to nowadays because most people find it convenient to just heat something up or grab a snack and go. There are many advantages as well as disadvantages to the paleo diet. Some advantages include: losing weight, no chemicals or additives, and a larger intake of iron and protein.” (Bonci 1). This diet will definitely make you feel better about yourself as a result of weight loss and consuming healthy food. Along with these advantages there are just as many disadvantages. Some of these disadvantages include: no grains or dairy which are essential for energy, strong bones and health, you can potentially have a nutrient imbalance, it is a hard diet for athletes, picky eaters and vegetarians and these foods tend to be more pricey (Bonci 1). I am a