What did the Neanderthals eat?
The diet of humans today is unbelievably diverse. We have access to an almost endless selection of foods from around the world, ranging from exotic species of plants to animals from well beyond our own geographic region. Earlier Hominids, however, did not have access to such niceties and had to rely solely on their own means to acquire the food they consumed. Yet the types of food that were consumed by early hominids is a question that is still quite a mystery for many paleoanthropologists. Unlike physical characteristics of Neanderthals (such as bone structure) determining the diet of a Neanderthal that has been dead for over 40,000 years is challenging.
The first method that researchers have in determining
…show more content…
diet is that of Dental Microwear. This method involves looking at the various teeth of Neanderthals and examining the various ridges and marks on the teeth at a microscopic level. The level of information obtained by analyzing the pattern allows researchers to infer whether, by looking at the wear patterns on Neanderthal teeth, it is possible to compare them to the wear by modern hunter gatherer societies. By identifying such patterns researchers are able to roughly determine what type of food sources formed the mainstay of Neanderthal diet. The groups in which the dental microwear from Neanderthals was being compared to were divided into arid, tropical or carnivorous groups. Most of the results from the dental microwear analysis indicated that Neanderthals’ dental wear patterns were close to the wear patterns of modern carnivorous groups. This implies that the majority of their diet was indeed composed of meat. Yet researchers did note that the microwear was not identical in all cases and that there were relatively large differences between the specimens selected. These differences indicated that, like modern humans today, the diets of Neanderthals could have varied greatly according to climate and the availability of resources. Another important method of determining the diet of Neanderthal comes from isotope analysis of the bones specimens. This process involves drilling the bone to collect a specimen, this specimen is then analyzed for the carbon nitrogen and sulfur content. These levels are then further analyzed to ensure that the specimen contains enough collagen to perform a more detailed analysis. The specimens are then further evaluated for various isotopes that allow the researchers to determine what type of diet was consumed. The nitrogen isotope levels from the tests conducted allow researchers to determine approximately the trophic level of Neanderthals. From these tests scientists were able to determine that Neanderthals had similar isotope compounds as other top level predators such as hyenas. The results from both of these tests clearly indicate that the Neanderthal diet consisted heavily of meat.
Yet, these two tests don't tell the whole story. While all this research shows that Neanderthals definitely consumed meat, the question is exactly how much of the diet could be comprised of meat. The issue of how much of the diet was comprised of plants is a much more difficult question, namely because plants contain very little protein compared to meats and therefore are almost negligible when being analyzed using isotope analysis. What this means to researchers is that the difference in nitrogen isotope levels between a diet of 50% meat and one consisting of 80% meat is almost negligible. This void of information has led to a greater discussion on the benefits and consequences of a high meat diet in …show more content…
Neanderthals. The benefits of a diet high in meat are surprisingly numerous-- the meat consumed by Neanderthals almost completely consists of lean meat from terrestrial mammals which have very little fat (less than 5% in most cases), This combined with the number of other micronutrients such as Fe, Zn, and Vitamin B12 are easily obtained through such a diet. Furthermore, minerals such as iron are also more easily absorbed from meat than from plants. The drawbacks of such a diet, however, do include the fact that Neanderthals will have to exert approximately 10-15% more energy in obtaining the food. Additionally, the consumption of a diet so high in meat could lead to a potentially dangerous level of nitrogen buildup that could cause a condition known as rabbit starvation, caused by the inability of the liver to produce sufficient enzymes to break down food. These problems have all lead to a greater analysis on the role of plants in the diet of Neanderthals, as plant consumption would almost certainly alleviate some of the problems discussed above. The difficulty of determining the exact role of plants in Neanderthal diet is the lack of traceable evidence that plants leave behind in comparison to other food sources.
Yet the claims that plants constituted a larger part than previously suspected is not without a complete lack of physical evidence- in fact, at sites in Israel, remains of nuts and seeds have been found in caves believed to have been inhabited by Neanderthals. Additionally artifacts and tools show clear signs of wear that many researchers conclude were likely caused by grinding plants and nuts. Considering the constraints of a high meat diet mentioned earlier it seems that Neanderthals would supplement their diet of meat with plants. An interesting suggestion is that they utilized UGO (Underground Storage Organs). examples of these include: tubers, corms, bulbs, rhizomes and true roots. All of which contain high levels of carbohydrates which would greatly improve the nutrition of Neanderthals - furthermore UGO’s are fairly easy to access by Neanderthals given the tools they had to dig and skin them. Also due to underground nature of UGO’s they are also a resource that would not be fiercely competed against by other creatures. Additionally these UGO’s would be available to Neanderthals all year round and providing a good source of mineral nutrients including Vitamin C and
Calcium. It is impossible to determine exactly what type of diet our ancestors before us had- The lack of physical evidence left behind may prevent us for knowing for sure. Yet through a greater analysis and new research methods we now have much more insight into the overall diet of neanderthals. Only time will tell if new discoveries in this field are found and how new techniques will allow us to gain a new perspective on on the diet that shaped our species. SOURCES: Hardy, Bruce L. "Climatic variability and plant food distribution in Pleistocene Europe: Implications for Neanderthal diet and subsistence." Quaternary Science Reviews 29.5 (2010): 662-679. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379109003898 Wißing, C., et al., Isotopic evidence for dietary ecology of late Neandertals in North-Western Europe,Quaternary International (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.09.091 http://www.academia.edu/19683303/Isotopic_evidence_for_dietary_ecology_of_late_Neandertals_in_North-Western_Europe Richards, M. P., & Trinkaus, E. (2009). Isotopic evidence for the diets of European Neanderthals and early modern humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(38), 16034-16039. http://www.pnas.org/content/106/38/16034.full
Also, Neanderthal mtDNA is differs severely from modern human mtDNA. For example, Microcephalin is a gene for brain size during the development of the organism. Modern human brain sizes are significantly smaller than Neanderthal’s and so are their brain cavities. TAS2R38 is the gene that controls taste. For Neanderthals, having a bitter taste “system” could have kept them from poisoning themselves by accident.
I will first show the lack of validity and soundness to Howard’s claim that A) a vegan lifestyle is a healthier choice and B) his claim that one must switch to that lifestyle to enjoy these said benefits. To the claim made in A, Howard uses his own health problems he endured on his meat diet, and uses it as a constant variable comparing it to his now relative healthy lifestyle as a vegan. On first glance anyone who eats a calorie-laden, unbalanced diet and ends up weighing 300 pounds, as Lyman himself admitted, will have health problems regardless of his orientation to meat or vegetables. With this said his comparing analogy is inertly flawed and must be disregarded from the argument he presents. On march 8 before the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, Mary K Young, MS.,R.D,NCBA Director of Nutrition Research and Information, presented the benefits of eating meat. Using Data from the 1995 USDA Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (CSI) she confirms that red meat enhances one overall diet quality. Young goes on to point out that red meat is the number one source for protein, B12, and zinc, number 2 source for B6 and third greatest source for iron, niacin and potassium. She also pointed out that red meat alone has the greatest concentrates of iron and zinc together. Also included cited in Young’s report was the research recently published in the Journal of the American...
In the article,Rethinking the Meat-Guzzler, Mark Bittman discusses the devastating effects the meat diet has on the planet. As the population continues to increase, the consumption of meat also increases. According to the article, it states that “Americans are downing close to 200 pounds of meat, poultry and fish per capita per
The idea that early hominids were powerful players in the ancient is slowly slipping away. Evidence is emerging that our ancestors were not great hunters, but scavengers that roamed the savanna looking for leftovers. Pat Shipman, discusses how it would be possible for early hominids to survive as strangers and how this method of cultivation affected human evolution. Shipman, uses the marks that stone tools, and teeth would make on the bones of prey animals as evidence for her hypothesis. She theorizes that early hominids weren't mighty hunter, but cunning scavengers.
There is evidence to suggest that Homo neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens had coexisted for approximately 35-40,000 years, (Fagan 2010) from around 60,000 years ago to 25,000 years ago when they finally went extinct (Gibbon 2001). Anthropologists are still uncertain what the cause of their extinction was. This paper will analyze three main theories of Neanderthal extinction. The first theory is the competition theory, which claims that the Homo sapiens and Neanderthals had to compete for resources, ultimately leading to their demise. The second theory I will discuss is the climate change theory, which claims that Homo sapiens lived while Neanderthals died because they were better adapted to the climate. The last theory I will discuss is the possible “extinction through absorption” theory which claims the Neanderthal interbred with the Homo sapiens and became one species. In this paper I will also be comparing the technologies, and diets of both species. In addition, I will look at the anatomic relation between the Neanderthals and Homo sapiens, how their body shape and size differed, and if this gave any advantage to one side or the other. My thesis for this paper will state that Homo sapiens and Homo neanderthalensis had co-existed but the disappearance of the Neanderthal in Eurasia is due to the appearance of the more culturally advanced and genetically superior Homo sapiens and the failure of the Neanderthal to adapt in an evolving climate.
As emphasized again and again by author Robb Wolf in his popular book, The Paleo Solution: The Original Human Diet, “Agricultural diets of today make us chronically ill.” The Paleo Diet, by forcing us to eat more like our caveman ancestors, fixes all of our detrimental, highly-processed, ca...
Neanderthals are the reason why white people have survived in today’s society. They have not only survived though, they became the leaders of today’s world. White people are associated with colonialism, hockey, politics, and business. They are such masterful beings, there must have been a superior gene that has been passed onto them from the Neanderthals. These individuals are leading the world into a positive direction due to leadership skills, and likability. It is important that Neanderthals interbred with Homo sapiens to allow life of the present day white population. Neanderthals were pale, strong, suave creature who seduced Homo sapiens. Traits that many white people have. Thankfully, Neanderthal blood is still alive within white people making them sexy survivalists who have the ability to dominate the world today. This will be proven by looking at their genes impacting survival, humanities preference for them as mates and leaders, and leadership qualities through politics and business.
With the arrival in Europe of modern humans, with an advanced and sophisticated technology 40,000years ago, Neanderthals started to vanish. Around 35,000 years ago temperatures started to decline and the most recent Neanderthal remains are found south in isolated seaside caves in Spain. Some tools are 29,000 years old. Neanderthals were still living in Croatia as recently as 28,000 years ago and in southern Spain only 30,000 years ago. The Croatian population had some modern human anatomical characteristics. A fossil of a 24,500-year-old early modern human child unearthed in
Most of their evidence comes from the fossilized bones of Neanderthals and Cro- Magnons, or modern man’s ancestors (Shreeve, 150). There is a definite difference between their bone structures, and it may be a significant enough difference to divide them into species. There is a set of traits that distinguishes Neanderthals. Their general proportions are short, robust, and strong. Males and females of all ages have thick bones, and very pronounced muscle and ligament attachment sites. They also have distinct facial and cranial features. They have a large skull with no chin, a significant brow-ridge, and a large nasal opening (Shreeve, 49-150). They have large brains, around 1400cc, that protrude in the back, causing an occipital bun in the skull (Lecture, 4/19). Cro-Magnons on the other hand look more like humans do today. They are more slender and not as muscular, with chins and rounder skulls with slightly smaller brains among other traits.
Neanderthals and modern humans coexisted for well over 100,000 years. Then suddenly Homo neandertalensis began to die out and surrender the earth to Homo sapiens. Paleontologists and anthropologists have entertained several possibilities to the causes of this event: interbreeding among Neanderthals and humans, competition for natural resources, and Darwin’s theory of “survival of the fittest.” What the real cause has been has plagued scientists for years. Now, due to an international research team from Germany, those possibilities have been even further deduced, making it easier to pinpoint the exact reason Homo neandertalensis became extinct.
Focused on available modern foods, the modern Paleolithic diet consist of mainly grass-fed meats and fish, eggs, vegetables and fruits, nuts and different types of mushrooms. This diet forbidden diary, potatoes, refined sugar, legumes, processed oils and salt, unless natural sea salt. So, as you can see, the Paleolithic diet includes all food that caveman could find and Paleolithic diet is not just some another diet with false promises. This particular diet excludes all bad food habits, like bad processed food, sweet and candies and much more that directly influence on our health, but in very dangerous and wrong way.
Teaford, Mark F. "Diet and the Evolution of the Earliest Human Ancestors." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 5 Oct. 2000. Web. 19 Nov. 2015. .
metabolic and physiological functions when nine participants consumed a Paleolithic diet for ten days. “Even sh...
So what exactly did cavemen eat, and why should you eat like them? Modern man has advanced significantly in food production, we have discovered ways to make food in all shapes and flavors. We have so many options on what to eat, and so many opinions on what’s good for us and what I not good for us. From the consumer view, nutrition is chaotic at best. One day something is good for you, the next it can cause disease. Eggs increase cholesterol, Eggs do not increase your cholesterol. Pizza is a healthy food, Pizza is junk-food. With so many different methods and practices it can get rather confusing. Take the USDA food pyramid for example, his poster can be found in school cafeterias and hospitals across the country. However an article from Scientific American magazine that was written by scientists from the Harvard school of public health was actually condemning the dietary recommendations of the food pyramid. (Cordain & Friel, 2005) At one point and time there were 30 million Americans following the Atkins diet by eating more fat and losing more weight. However in utter contrast Dean Ornish says that fat and meat cause cancer, heart disease and obesity, and that we would all be better off by converting to vegetarianism. (Cordain & Friel, 2005) In other more well-developed scientific disciplines, universal paradigms help guide researchers to informative end points while they design their respective experiments and theories. For example in Geology the continental drift model established that all current continents were at one time joined as one large continuous landmass that eventually drifted apart to form our current continents. These concepts are not theories but undisputed facts that serve as an orientation for other inquiries r...
The hunter-gatherer diet had great variation of nutrients with increased amounts of animal products and also plant foods. As they transitioned to agriculture about 10,000 years ago, the great variety of foods was impossible to maintain. Instead, humans’ diet was primarily made of larger quantities of the fewer plants they domesticated, such as rice, wheat, and corn. As dietary diversity was in decline, the energy expenditure of growing crops was higher, especially in certain seasons. Nutritional deficiencies started to show up in populations where diet was based on one or two staples of food. Ancient bones show a variety of information about how nutritional status of humans was affected by the transition to agriculture. Claire Cassidy’s comparison between Indian Knoll hunter-gatherer and Hardin Village skeletons shows that tooth decay and porotic hyperostosis are more prevalent in humans who had agricultural diets (as cited in Wiley & Allen, 2013, p.90). Also, growth disruption is more severe and occurred for a longer period of time in the groups that relied on domesticating and growing their