Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Waiting for Godot critical analysis
Biography of samuel beckett and the theater of the absurd
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Waiting for Godot critical analysis
Samuel Beckett wrote Waiting for Godot between October 1948 and January 1949. Since its premiere in January of 1953, it has befuddled and confounded critics and audiences alike. Some find it to be a meandering piece of drivel; others believe it to be genius. Much of the strain between the two sides stems from one simple question. What does this play mean? Even within camps where Waiting for Godot is heralded, the lack of clarity and consensus brings about a tension and discussion that has lasted over sixty years.
I will look at what I have determined to be the three most predominant interpretations of the play, including anti-Christianity, existentialism, and nihilism. By also examining Beckett’s life and influences, I believe that a well-rounded set of possibilities will be presented. Finally, I will use sources to work my own argument. I believe this play is inherently about nothing, and that it is us as readers that over-complicate it. Because we search for meaning in everything, Waiting for Godot has to mean something, otherwise it does not fit into what we find comfortable or acceptable. I will start by delving into Samuel Beckett’s background.
One of the more bizarre bits about Beckett’s life was that he claimed to have vivid prenatal memories. According to James Knowlson, author of the only authorized Beckett biography entitled Damned to Fame: The Life of Samuel Beckett, these memories were not pleasant. He writes, “Yet the memories that, as an adult he claimed to have of the womb, deriving probably from the period shortly before his birth were associated more with feelings of being trapped and unable to escape, imprisoned and in pain (Knowlson 23-24).” This sense of being forcibly held in stasis and wanti...
... middle of paper ...
...odot: tragicomedy in 2 acts,. New York: Grove Press, 1954. Print.
Gordon, Lois G.. Reading Godot. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2002. Print.
Knowlson, James. Damned to fame: the life of Samuel Beckett. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996. Print.
Shobeiri, Ashkan. "Beckett's Atheism in Waiting for Godot and Endgame : a Proof for Absurdism." International journal of Humanities and social science 1.27 (2011): n. pag. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. Web. 9 May 2014.
"Matthew 25." The Holy Bible: New International version : containing the Old Testament and the New Testament.. East Brunswick, NJ: International Bible Society, 1984. 31-46. Print.
Valentine, John. "Nihilism and the Eschaton in Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot." Florida Philosophical Review [Orlando] 16 Dec. 2009: n. pag. Florida Philosophical Review. Web. 30 Mar. 2014.
From the moment that the curtain rises, Waiting for Godot assumes an unmistakably absurdist identity. On the surface, little about the plot of the play seems to suggest that the actions seen on stage could or would ever happen. At the very least, the process of waiting hardly seems like an ideal focus of an engaging and entertaining production. Yet it is precisely for this reason that Beckett’s tale of two men, whose only discernable goal in life is to wait for a man known simply as Godot, is able to connect with the audience’s emotions so effectivel...
Jacobsen, Josephine and Mueller, William R., The Testament of Samuel Beckett, Faber and Faber Ltd., London, 1966
The plots were different. The dramatists believed that the human existence is absurd and they used comedy in their plays such as ,Beckett's Waiting for Godot,(1953) (Drabble3). Beckett has tackled political themes in his plays such as, Catastrophe (1982), and What Where (1983) which deals with torture and totalitarian. Beckett's plays are not intellectually understood. Besides, irony was used in his works and his plays are closed compositions. The characters from the beginning until the end remain the same without development. In the Absurd Theatre the writers selected strange names for their works in order to reflect their rejection of the norms and the conventional values (Innes428-31). As for the Naturalistic Theatre, it rejects the natural laws. The naturalists and the realists share the same idea that the issues of the middle and lower classes should be tackled in the literary works. The writers at that time focused on the influence of the economic and material environment (drabble
Existentialism, when reintroduced in the twentieth century, became increasingly secular. Mirroring the societal changes caused from both world wars, writers, as well as the general population, began to stop the search for faith, and look inward searching for practices that led to self-fulfillment. Existentialist, play write, Samuel Beckett, openly ridicules believers in his play Waiting for Godot (Beckett). Making fools of those who cast their cares to a higher power Beckett started an existential revolution. The epitome of modern, existential, theory is displayed in the characters who lead lackluster lives. Atheistic existentialists believe that there is no all-powerful being that controls the universe, but that humanity lives in a state of chaos in which individual assigns purpose to life. Existential atheists do believe that, however, that, “…if God does not exist the...
“Perceiving Rockaby – As a Text, as a Text by Samuel Beckett, as a Text forPerformance.” Lyons, Charles R. Comparative Drama, 1982-1983 Winter; 16 (4): 297-311.
Kern, Edith. “Drama Stripped for Inaction: Beckett’s Godot.” Yale French Studies. Vol. 14. Yale University Press, 1954. 41-47. JSTOR. 22 Mar. 2004. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0044-0078%281954>.
abandoned the conventions of the classical play to concentrate on his important message to humanity. Using his pathetic characters, Estragon and Vladimir, Beckett illustrates the importance of human free will in a land ruled by science and technology. He understood the terrors of progress as he witnessed first hand the destruction caused by technologically-improved weapons working as a spy during WWII. In his tragicomedy, Estragon and Vladimir spend the entire time futilely waiting for Godot to arrive. They believe that this mysterious Godot will help them solve their problems and merely sit and wait for their solution to arrive. Beckett utilizes these characters to warn the reader of the dangers of depending on fate and others to improve one's existence. He supports this idea when Estragon blames his boots and not himself for the pain in his feet, and Vladimir responds, "There'...
Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot has been said by many people to be a long book about nothing. The two main characters, Vladimir and Estragon, spend all their time sitting by a tree waiting for someone named Godot, whose identity is never revealed to the audience. It may sound pretty dull at first but by looking closely at the book, it becomes apparent that there is more than originally meets the eye. Waiting for Godot was written to be a critical allegory of religious faith, relaying that it is a natural necessity for people to have faith, but faiths such as Catholicism are misleading and corrupt.
In Samuel Beckett Tragicomedy Waiting for Godot he begs the question of life and death. Throughout the commotion of the play Becket addresses the age old debate of the afterlife and if people willingly pass this life to enter into Gods kingdom or if God calls them. Beckett introduces characters such as Estragon, Vladimir, and Lucky to illustrate the different types of perspectives that man has taken on this debate.
Beckett, Samuel. Waiting For Godot. 3rd ed. N.p.: CPI Group, 2006. Print. Vol. 1 of Samuel Beckett: The Complete Dramatic Works. 4 vols
The setting is the next day at the same time. Estragon's boots and Lucky's hat are still on the stage. Vladimir enters and starts to sing until Estragon shows up barefoot. Estragon is upset that Vladimir was singing and happy even though he was not there. Both admit that they feel better when alone but convince themselves they are happy when together. They are still waiting for Godot.
Irish-born French author Samuel Beckett was well known for his use of literary devices such as black comedy in his various literary works. Written during late 1948 and early 1949 and premiered as a play in 1953 as En attendant Godot, Beckett coupled these devices with minimalism and absurdity in order to create the tragicomedy known to English speakers as Waiting for Godot. True to its title, Waiting for Godot is the tale of a pair of best friends known as Vladimir (Didi) and Estragon (Gogo) who are waiting for the character the audience comes to know as Godot to appear. Throughout Beckett’s play Waiting for Godot, Samuel Beckett alludes to the monotheistic religion of Christianity through symbols, dialogue, and characters to reveal the heavy invisible influence of God in the daily life of man.
Humans spend their lives searching and creating meaning to their lives, Beckett, however, takes a stand against this way of living in his novel ‘Waiting for Godot’. He questions this ideal of wasting our lives by searching for a reason for our existence when there is not one to find. In his play, he showcases this ideology through a simplistic and absence of setting and repetitious dialogue. Beckett’s ability to use these key features are imperative to his ability of conveying his message of human entrapment and existence.
Although Samuel Beckett's tragicomedy, Waiting for Godot, has no definite meaning or interpretation, the play acts as a statement of hopelessness regarding human existence. Debate surrounds the play because, due to its simplicity, almost any interpretation is valid. The main characters, Vladimir and Estragon, are aging men who must wait for a person, being, or object named Godot, but this entity never appears to grace the men with this presence. Both characters essentially demonstrate how one must go through life when hope is nonexistent as they pointlessly attempt to entertain themselves with glum conversation in front of a solitary tree. The Theater of the Absurd, a prevalent movement associated with Waiting for Godot, serves as the basis for the message of hopelessness in his main characters. Samuel Beckett's iconic Waiting for Godot and his perception of the characteristics and influence of the Theater of the Absurd illustrate the pointlessness and hopelessness regarding existence. In the play, boredom is mistaken for hopelessness because the men have nothing to do, as they attempt to occupy themselves as, for some reason, they need to wait for Godot. No hope is present throughout the two-act play with little for Estragon and Vladimir to occupy their time while they, as the title indicates, wait for Godot.
Even though there are many opinions that sustain that “Waiting for Godot” is a comedy more than a tragedy. For Example, Aristotle set the guidelines for tragedy in “Poetics” and he said “Tragedy is not an imitation of persons but of actions and of life, there could not be tragedy without action, but there could be without character.” Samuel’s Beckett play is all character, no action, so it is a comedy, even if occasionally tragic. It is true that the dominant impression of the play is serious and tragic, but the comic elements occupy a considerable position in the play.