Life And Death In Samuel Beckett's Waiting For Godot

1036 Words3 Pages

In Samuel Beckett Tragicomedy Waiting for Godot he begs the question of life and death. Throughout the commotion of the play Becket addresses the age old debate of the afterlife and if people willingly pass this life to enter into Gods kingdom or if God calls them. Beckett introduces characters such as Estragon, Vladimir, and Lucky to illustrate the different types of perspectives that man has taken on this debate. In Beckett’s tragicomedy he introduces a man who is aware of his staidness, but is unwilling to change his ways. When another character Pozzo claims that he does not “seem able … to depart” Estragon quickly voices his ideology as he says “such is life.” In the absurdness of the play his words appear to be nonsense, but when examined …show more content…

Didi believes in a higher power and is not sure why, but his actions lead the reader to believe that he knows there is more than just a tree and a path, but there is something holding him back. Didi is waiting for God to pick him up and call him to something rather than his existentialist counterpart Estragon who wants to write his own destiny. Vladimir’s philological beliefs become evident when he asks himself if he “was sleeping while the others suffered? [and is he] sleeping now?” In the context of the play this question seems irrelevant, yet in the context of life these thoughts can be profound in meaning. Vladimir questions if he helped or hinders the morality of others was he a perpetrator of pain or a protector of peace. Among the apparent nonsense of the play there is a repetition of lines that are initiated by estragon and answered by Vladimir countless times in the play. Estragon says “Let 's go.” Vladimir replies “We can 't.” Estragon questions “Why not?” Vladimir answers “We 're waiting for Godot.” Estragon remarks an “Ah!” Vladimir appears to have the answers just as man attempts to make sense out of life, but is that the best course of actions. Should mankind be the ones in charge or should man surrender to an Invisible God or should man created their own destiny or should man attempt to adhere by the …show more content…

Lucky a man of little words shocks the audience when he gives the longest speech in the play which at a glance makes no sense, but upon investigation Lucky could perhaps bestowed the reader with the most profound ideology in the play. Among all the gibberish Lucky expresses his thoughts: “Given the existence…of a personal God… outside of time … who loves us dearly… and suffers... with those who… are plunged in torment… for reasons unknown… as a result of the labors left unfinished.” Lucky answers the question Beckett and Roland Barthes and countless other authors have attempted to answer, and Lucky answer is simple. The reason is unknown the reason why literature is the question minus the answer is unknown the reason people are fearful of death is unknown the reason people are existentialist or essentialist is unknown. Beckett teachers the reader through lucky that for some questions the answer or reason is unknown. Seven times lucky repeats for reasons unknown. There are seven vices and virtues why? For reasons unknown. Seven days of the week why? For reasons unknown. Each time lucky proclaims “for reasons unknown” is another time for the audience to remember that nothing is certain and before they know it they will be called or wonder to a place outside of time for reasons unknown and their labors abandoned and left

Show More
Related

  • Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot and Tony Kushner’s Angels in America

    1423 Words  | 3 Pages

    From the moment that the curtain rises, Waiting for Godot assumes an unmistakably absurdist identity. On the surface, little about the plot of the play seems to suggest that the actions seen on stage could or would ever happen. At the very least, the process of waiting hardly seems like an ideal focus of an engaging and entertaining production. Yet it is precisely for this reason that Beckett’s tale of two men, whose only discernable goal in life is to wait for a man known simply as Godot, is able to connect with the audience’s emotions so effectivel...

    Read More

  • Comparing the Human Condition in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead and Waiting for Godot

    1328 Words  | 3 Pages

    In ‘Waiting for Godot’, we know little concerning the protagonists, indeed from their comments they appear to know little about themselves and seem bewildered and confused as to the extent of their existence.  Their situation is obscure and Vladimir and Estragon spend the day (representative of their lives) waiting for the mysterious Godot, interacting with each other with quick and short speech.

    Read More

  • An Analysis of Mortality in Hamlet by William Shakespeare

    2189 Words  | 5 Pages

    In his tragedy Hamlet, William Shakespeare explores and analyzes the concept of mortality and the inevitability of death through the development of Hamlet’s understanding and ideology regarding the purpose for living. Through Hamlet’s obsessive fascination in understanding the purpose for living and whether death is the answer, Shakespeare analyzes and interprets the meaning of different elements of mortality and death: The pain death causes to others, the fading of evidence of existence through death, and the reason for living. While due to the inevitable and unsolvable mystery of the uncertainty of death, as no being will ever empirically experience death and be able to tell the tale, Shakespeare offers an answer to the reason for living through an analysis of Hamlet’s development in understanding death.

    Read More

  • Freedom to Choose in Waiting for Godot, Slaughterhouse-Five, and Iraq

    1484 Words  | 3 Pages

    abandoned the conventions of the classical play to concentrate on his important message to humanity. Using his pathetic characters, Estragon and Vladimir, Beckett illustrates the importance of human free will in a land ruled by science and technology. He understood the terrors of progress as he witnessed first hand the destruction caused by technologically-improved weapons working as a spy during WWII. In his tragicomedy, Estragon and Vladimir spend the entire time futilely waiting for Godot to arrive. They believe that this mysterious Godot will help them solve their problems and merely sit and wait for their solution to arrive. Beckett utilizes these characters to warn the reader of the dangers of depending on fate and others to improve one's existence. He supports this idea when Estragon blames his boots and not himself for the pain in his feet, and Vladimir responds, "There'...

    Read More

  • Pozzo and Lucky: Progression of Time

    1227 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the play Waiting for Godot written and translated by Samuel Beckett, readers follow along as characters, Didi, and Gogo, are seen waiting for someone by the name Godot, in which they never show, and time is very rarely mentioned in the play, besides thru very few encounters with Pozzo, and Lucky, and the mention of night and day. As the play progresses Didi and Gogo start to lose faith in what they're waiting for, and as Pozzo and Lucky grow old, they achieve less, and become more useless. Therefore in the play, Beckett uses the progression and development of Pozzo and lucky’s relationship as well as themselves in order to portray the lack of faith in humanity, and the lack of purpose for life.

    Read More

  • Samuel Beckett’s Waiting For Godot: A Critical Allegory of Religious Faith

    1043 Words  | 3 Pages

    Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot has been said by many people to be a long book about nothing. The two main characters, Vladimir and Estragon, spend all their time sitting by a tree waiting for someone named Godot, whose identity is never revealed to the audience. It may sound pretty dull at first but by looking closely at the book, it becomes apparent that there is more than originally meets the eye. Waiting for Godot was written to be a critical allegory of religious faith, relaying that it is a natural necessity for people to have faith, but faiths such as Catholicism are misleading and corrupt.

    Read More

  • The Frontier of Existence in Beckett’s Waiting for Godot and Ionesco’s Rhinoceros

    2044 Words  | 5 Pages

    This essay will explore the frontier of existence in Beckett’s Waiting for Godot and Ionesco’s Rhinoceros

    Read More

  • Time and Repetition in Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett

    999 Words  | 2 Pages

    Life is made up of different routines and schedules that are followed by the ordinary human being daily. In ‘Waiting for Godot’, Samuel Beckett uses time and repetition consistently throughout the play to demonstrate how these routines and habits are key elements in the course of life itself. The three main devices Beckett uses are the illogical pass of time, the lack of a past or a future and the absurdity of repetition in both dialogue and actions within the main characters and their surroundings.

    Read More

  • Waiting for Godot: Who is Godot?

    577 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot two characters, Estragon and Vladmir are waiting for ‘Godot’ in which Beckett does not explain. Along with Estragon and Vlamir comes Lucky and Pozzo another two figures who add a bit of nonsense into the play to distract the reader from the real issue, waiting for Godot. Simply who or what is ‘Godot’, is the question that Beckett’s play raises. It is easy to say that Godot is a Christ figure or God, hopefully Beckett would not make it that easy. So who/what is Godot? One may say that the characters are just waiting for someone or something to make sense of the world that they are in. The characters hopelessly wait day after day for this ‘Godot’ to come, and yet it never arrives. One must look into each character to find out who it is that Godot is searching for.

    Read More

  • Summary of Samuel Beckett’s Waiting For Godot

    865 Words  | 2 Pages

    Soon they are done talking and try to find another topic for discussion. Vladimir finds Lucky's hat and tries it on. He and Estragon spend a while trading hats until Vladimir throws his own hat on the ground and asks how he looks. They then decide to play at being Pozzo and Lucky, but to no avail. Estragon leaves only to immediately return panting. He says that they are coming. Vladimir thinks that it must be Godot who is coming to save them. He then becomes afraid and tries to hide Estragon behind the tree, which is too small to hide him.

    Read More

  • Waiting For Godot And The Beast In The Jungle Analysis

    1216 Words  | 3 Pages

    Time acts as an unmovable object or barrier for the two men and by waiting so long for Godot it presents the main conflict faced by the two men. They have to endure waiting by this tree so that they may finally realize the true purpose of why they have been waiting so long for one man to make their acquaintance. They are waiting to realize their purpose in life and their purpose for wasting their life waiting for one man. Every character in Waiting for Godot has very faulty memory, which presents an issue for the characters because they cannot remember what they did yesterday and they proceed to have almost the same exact day every single day. The two different acts in the play represent two different days for Vladimir and Estragon and yet at the same time the two days are almost exactly the same. On both days two men named Pozzo and Lucky approach Vladimir and Estragon. Both times they encounter each other they treat it as if it is a first impression and they have never met before. Even the boy who serves, as Godot’s messenger does not remember encountering the men the previous day, even though it is apparent that this action is also a part of the never-ending cycle Vladimir and Estragon

    Read More

  • Christianity in Waiting for Godot

    975 Words  | 2 Pages

    Irish-born French author Samuel Beckett was well known for his use of literary devices such as black comedy in his various literary works. Written during late 1948 and early 1949 and premiered as a play in 1953 as En attendant Godot, Beckett coupled these devices with minimalism and absurdity in order to create the tragicomedy known to English speakers as Waiting for Godot. True to its title, Waiting for Godot is the tale of a pair of best friends known as Vladimir (Didi) and Estragon (Gogo) who are waiting for the character the audience comes to know as Godot to appear. Throughout Beckett’s play Waiting for Godot, Samuel Beckett alludes to the monotheistic religion of Christianity through symbols, dialogue, and characters to reveal the heavy invisible influence of God in the daily life of man.

    Read More

  • Importance Of Symbolism In Waiting For Godot

    804 Words  | 2 Pages

    Humans spend their lives searching and creating meaning to their lives, Beckett, however, takes a stand against this way of living in his novel ‘Waiting for Godot’. He questions this ideal of wasting our lives by searching for a reason for our existence when there is not one to find. In his play, he showcases this ideology through a simplistic and absence of setting and repetitious dialogue. Beckett’s ability to use these key features are imperative to his ability of conveying his message of human entrapment and existence.

    Read More

  • Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot as an Existentialist Play

    4413 Words  | 9 Pages

    The play, Waiting For Godot, is centred around two men, Estragon and Vladimir, who are waiting for a Mr. Godot, of whom they know little. Estragon admits himself that he may never recognize Mr. Godot, "Personally I wouldn't know him if I ever saw him." (p.23). Estragon also remarks, "… we hardly know him." (p.23), which illustrates to an audience that the identity of Mr. Godot is irrelevant, as little information is ever given throughout the play about this indefinable Mr. X. What is an important element of the play is the act of waiting for someone or something that never arrives. Western readers may find it natural to speculate on the identity of Godot because of their inordinate need to find answers to questions. Beckett however suggests that the identity of Godot is in itself a rhetorical question. It is possible to stress the for in the waiting for …: to see the purpose of action in two men with a mission, not to be deflected from their compulsive task.

    Read More

  • Waiting For Godot Analysis

    1289 Words  | 3 Pages

    Although Samuel Beckett's tragicomedy, Waiting for Godot, has no definite meaning or interpretation, the play acts as a statement of hopelessness regarding human existence. Debate surrounds the play because, due to its simplicity, almost any interpretation is valid. The main characters, Vladimir and Estragon, are aging men who must wait for a person, being, or object named Godot, but this entity never appears to grace the men with this presence. Both characters essentially demonstrate how one must go through life when hope is nonexistent as they pointlessly attempt to entertain themselves with glum conversation in front of a solitary tree. The Theater of the Absurd, a prevalent movement associated with Waiting for Godot, serves as the basis for the message of hopelessness in his main characters. Samuel Beckett's iconic Waiting for Godot and his perception of the characteristics and influence of the Theater of the Absurd illustrate the pointlessness and hopelessness regarding existence. In the play, boredom is mistaken for hopelessness because the men have nothing to do, as they attempt to occupy themselves as, for some reason, they need to wait for Godot. No hope is present throughout the two-act play with little for Estragon and Vladimir to occupy their time while they, as the title indicates, wait for Godot.

    Read More

More about Life And Death In Samuel Beckett's Waiting For Godot

Open Document