Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Patriarchy detailed essay
Women in ancient times
Women in ancient times
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Patriarchy detailed essay
In our modern society men are in control of most resources and tend to have more power. This raises a question, has it always been this way? Is patriarchy natural, meaning it is set in our genes, or is it historical? In the first section of Worlds Of History Kevin Reilly provides various sources to try to prove his point that patriarchy is historical. He takes sources which show that in each stage of food production, those being hunter gathering, horticulture, and plough based agriculture, had different genders in power. An article by The Economist discusses a French historian’s description of how power shifted from females to males after the adoption of the plough in Mesopotamia. When putting together the sources from Kevin Reilly and the article from The Economist a full and coherent argument is made to prove that patriarchy is historical.
In hunter gatherer communities, men and women seem to have an equal amount of power. In his second source, Reilly provides part of a story from a present-day !Kung woman named Nisa. Though this may not be an accurate representation of people who lived over ten thousand years ago, her story is one of the closest resources we have today. In this tribe it seems as though age is more important than gender, “When adults talked to me, I listened.” (Shostak 11) Nisa says as she begins her story. The passage “My mother said, ‘Nonsense. When I tell you I’m going to give you a husband, why do you say you want me to marry him? Why are you talking to me like this?’” (Shostak 12) demonstrates that men were seen as an object that was given to a woman in marriage. This shows that women did in fact have power over men. However, men did have power too, “That’s when my father said, ‘No, don’t do all the talking...
... middle of paper ...
...king at each period of agriculture both the magazine and the book have shown that due to a shift in power from male to female in all three stages patriarchy can in no way be considered natural.
Works Cited
Boulding, Elise. “Women and the Agricultural Revolution”. Worlds of History: A Comparative Reader. Vol. One: To 1550. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2004. 16-20
Lerner, Gerda. “The Urban Revolution: Origins of Patriarchy”. Worlds of History: A Comparative Reader. Vol. One: To 1550. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2004. 21-28
Shostak, Marjorie. “Nisa: The Life and Words of a !Kung Woman”. Worlds of History: A Comparative Reader. Vol. One: To 1550. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2004. 10-16.
Reilly, Kevin. Worlds of History: A Comparative Reader. Vol. One: To 1550. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2004. 1-28
“The Plough and the Now” The Economist. 23 July 2011: 74.
Shostak’s ethnography, Nisa: The Life and Words of a !Kung Woman, is a collection of memories and life events recounted by a !Kung woman named Nisa in the early 1970s, and translated to English by Shostak, and published along with Shostak’s own observations and research on !Kung
The 19th Century is an age that is known for the Industrial Revolution. What some people don’t realize is the effect that this revolution had on gender roles in not only the middle and upper classes (Radek.) It started off at its worst, men were considered powerful, active, and brave; where as women were in no comparison said to be weak, passive, and timid (Radek.) Now we know this not to be true, however, back in the day people only went by what would allow ...
Cott, Nancy F. The Bonds of Womanhood: "Woman's Sphere" in New England, 1780-1835. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1977.
Throughout history, it is clear that men are usually seen to be advantaged by the logic of domination while females tend to be disadvantaged. Whether it be in the workplace, household, or even the bible men have always been inferior to women. Through history, cultural norms and stereotypes gender roles were created and have been present throughout society. Although it is believed that males are more advantaged than females the texts Eve and Adam: Genesis 2-3 Reread by Phyllis Trible and The Creation and Fall of Man and Woman explain how men and woman are in fact equal and maybe even disadvantaged by these cultural arrangements. Therefore, throughout history it is clear that gender discourses would allow one to believe that men are advantaged
In a patriarchal society men normally have the power. This power is generally handed down generation to generation as seen in Sundiata where the lineage of the first kings of Mali is explained generation by generation (Niane 3). It can also be seen in The Romance of Tristan and Iseult when “[T']he barons, Andret, Guenelon, Gondoine, and Denoalen pressed King Mark to take to wife some king's daughter who should give him an heir...”(Bedier 26). In these examples men generally have the primary power. However, there is an argument to be made that women, in both Sundiata, and The Romance of Tristan and Iseult have some significant power in their society.
Gender roles have been a predominant factor in our world since the early emergence of human societies whether they are positive or negative. They are based on expectations that societies have over the people in them. The Epic of Sunjata, shows us how men and women are treated almost equally in different forms. Women are praised for their ability to birth leaders, which is similar to the early Greek Society. In most societies, women are treated less equal than men. This was prevalent in the early Indian society. No matter the gender role, it has been shown that any society cannot survive without both men and women.
Most classical society’s political and social organization revolved around the idea of patriarchy, a male dominated social system. This system exacerbated the inherit difference between men and woman and assigned gender roles based on these observations. Men were generally regarded as superior to woman therefore given greater religious and political roles as well as more legal rights. As the natural inverse, women were subordinated and seen as week; their main roles reproductive and domestic. Information about patriarchy in the classical era, though abundant, was, for the most part, written by men, therefore history does not give us an accurate depiction of women’s viewpoints. Four societies of the classical era, India, China, Greece, and Rome, adopted a patriarchal system, however, due to many factors, each developed identifiable characteristics.
This journal highlights advances women made in the seventeenth century. Upham goes into great detail about certain leaders in the advancement of women such as Catherine Trotter, Mary Pix, and Aphra Behn.
Boston: Bedford Books, 1998. 1467 - 1471.
Lewis, Jan. "Women and the American Revolution." OAH Magazine of History, Summer 1994, 23-26. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25162982 (accessed February 20, 2011).
National Women’s History Museum, (2007), Women’s Changing Roles as Citizens of a New Republic, retrieved from: http://www.nwhm.org/online-exhibits/education/1700s_2.htm
French, Katherine L., and Allyson M. Poska. Women and Gender in the Western past. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 2007. Print.
Prior to the use of agriculture, life was extremely different for women. The information that historians have obtained is limited, but there are certain aspects of Paleolithic society that have been discovered and point towards a more liberal lifestyle for women. Generally, a woman’s job was to gather food and tend to her children while her male counterpart hunted. These simple divisions allowed both men and women to play significant roles in hunter-gatherer society, which further allowed women to be held in equal if not greater esteem then men. According to Elisabeth Gaynor Ellis and Anthony Elser, authors of World History: Connections to Today, women also held...
Anna Freud, the founder of child psychoanalysis, once said, “It is only when parental feelings are ineffective or too ambivalent or when the mother's emotions are temporarily engaged elsewhere that children feel lost” (“Anna Freud”). In this case, the children, Romeo and Juliet, get lost and confused, leading to their ultimate deaths. While they cannot live without each other, they also cannot live with each other either, since they end up dying together from all the conflicts piling on top on each other. Since Romeo and Juliet do not really have any parental influence in their lives, they do not know how resolve their conflict of star-crossed love. Due to miscommunication, conflicting viewpoints between parents and adolescents, and a lack of involvement in their children’s lives, Shakespeare shows through Romeo and Juliet that adults are ineffective in saving their children’s lives.
Norton Anthology of World Masterpieces. Ed Mack, Maynard et al. W. W. Norton and Co., New York, NY. 1992. The 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary 1551 - 1621.