Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
+ impact of organization culture on employee behaviour
Impact of organisational culture on employee behavior
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction: Information security has become one of the most pressing issues government agencies, corporations and organizations deal with. Organizations have heavily invested in securing their information from unauthorized access. This investment comes in the form of building physical and virtual infrastructures, as well as training employees in the best practices of information security (Ifinedo, 2012). Despite such efforts, employee’s compliance with information security guidelines within an organization has been one of the driving factors jeopardizing the security of information owned by an organization. Therefore, understanding what predicts compliance with information security policies presets a great opportunity for organizations …show more content…
This organizational atmosphere is viewed as a potential explanatory factor of employees’ conduct. This can be viewed by decomposing the organizational environment into policies, regulations, interactions between management and lower ranks; then inspecting relationships between these components and employees’ behavior (Son, 2011). As a whole this holistic environment may be seen as a force driving a particular behavior within the organization. Employees process the inputs around them gathered from the various components of organizational environment and behave in ways influenced by such inputs (Son, …show more content…
For instance, organizational environment as a whole was seen to drive the conduct of employees. More recent research differentiated between the various components and even suggested the distance of multiple organizational environments within a single organization (Al-Omari, Deokar, El-Gayar, 2012). It tried to connect a particular environment with a specific behavior. For instance, one study investigated the morale environment effect on workers’ perceived motivations for their work. It found that organizations with a transformational organizational environment tended to have employees with higher scores of work motivation (Al-Omari, Deokar, El-Gayar, 2012). This analysis utilizes the particular environment of information security as a potential predictor of employee’s compliance with information security
Security helps the organization meet its business objectives or mission by protecting its physical and financial resources, reputation, legal position, employees, and other tangible and intangible assets through the selection and application of appropriate safeguards. Businesses should establish roles and responsibilities of all personnel and staff members. However, a Chief Information Officer should be appointed to direct an organization’s day to day management of information assets. Supporting roles are performed by the service providers and include systems operations, whose personnel design and operate the computer systems. Each team member must be held accountable in ensuring all of the rules and policies are being followed, as well as, understanding their roles, responsibilities and functions. Organizations information processing systems are vulnerable to many threats that can inflict various types of damage that can result in significant losses (Harris, 2014). Losses can come from actions from trusted employees that defraud the system, outside hackers, or from careless data entry. The major threat to information protection is error and omissions that data entry personnel, users, system operators and programmers make. To better protect business information resources, organizations should conduct a risk analysis to see what
Robbins , Stephen P. and Judge, Timothy, A. Organizational Behavior. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. Prentice Hall. Pearson Custom Publishing. 2008 Print
The Different Ways Organizations Can Be Structured and Operated There are four major ways a company - organization can be structured and operate. P.C.G (o) Ltd I would dare say that is structured and operates with the functional structure. In order to make it clear and understandable I am analyzing here below the four ways that organizations can structure and operate. We will observe that all four structures have there advantages and disadvantages. In order also to assist you understand better the differences of the four ways that organizations can be structured see in Page 4 & 5 Figures 1,2,3 which are the layout of the organization charts for each structure: 1.
This report will research a variety of organisational behavior theories.The following report will start with comparing and contrasting different the organisational structure and culture within Siemens to another organisation. Other parts of the report will focus on individual behavior,organisational theory,motivational theories and the impact of team work on organisational performance.
the risk of security incidents and breaches is reduced by encouraging employees to think and act in more security conscious ways;
Kolb, D. A., Osland, J. S., Rubin, I. M., & Turner, M. E. (2007). The Organizational Behavior
Ivancevich, J., Konopaske, R. & Matteson, M. (2011). Organizational Behavior and Management. NewYork, NY: McGraw Hill.
Staff behaviors control the performance and capabilities of an organization. Most workers display productive or counterproductive productive behaviors that have effect on workers, clients, and programs. The ability to control these behaviors is a necessary part of delivering exceptional services. Many workers automatically adopt behaviors that fit in with the best interest of the organization. Although these behaviors are common, some employees fail to follow order and create havoc for others around them. Productive behavior allows workers to perform daily functions whereas counterproductive behaviors develop issues that are costly. Good behavior contributes to goals and objectives set by the organization (Britt & Jex, 2008).
Ivancevich, John, Knopaske, Robert, Matteson, Michael, Organizational Behaviour and Management (10 edition (January 30, 2013). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Controlling is the fourth management function and its purpose is straightforward- to make sure that actual performance meets or surpasses objectives. It is well used for decision making and problem solving. Effective control depends on other management functions and it gives feedback to them. These functions are planning, organizing and leading. Planning sets directions and allocates resources. Organizing puts people and material resources together in working combinations. Leading motivates people to use these resources in the best way. Basically, the function of controlling is to make sure that the right things happen in a right time and in the right way.Control helps that overall directions of individuals and groups are consistent with short-range and long-range organizational plans. Also, it helps to ensure that objectives and accomplishments are coherent with one another throughout an organization. Moreover, it helps maintaining fulfillment with essential organizational rules and policies. Good example where we can see role of control is in helping to protect individual rights to become equivalent with employment opportunities at work. The control process practiced by managers includes four steps: 1) establish objectives and standards 2) measure actual performance 3) compare results with objectives and standards and 4) take actions if necessary1. The controlling process starts with establishing performance objectives and standards which means that the controlling process begins with planning. Performance objectives should be defined and associated with specific measurement standards for determining how well they are accomplished. Standards are the targets of performance. The next step of the control process would be measur...
George, J.M. & Jones, G. R.(2005). Understanding and managing organizational behavior (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.
Individuals behave in a given manner based not on the way their external environment actually is but, rather, on what they see or believe it to be. An organization may spend millions of dollars to create a pleasant work environment for its employees. However, in spite of these expenditures, if an employee believes that his or her job that assigned to them is lousy and feel unsatisfactory, that employee will behave accordingly.
The organization is made up of quite a significant number of departments, which assists the business to meet its objectives and mission statement. These departments are filled with employees who are still considered to be individuals, with various personalities, beliefs, cultures, values and social norms. As a result negative situations are bound to occur, which often lead in deviant workplace behaviour. According to Robbins, Judge, Odendaalm and Roodt (2009) deviant workplace behaviour can be defined as, “voluntary behaviour that violates significant organizational norms and, in so doing, threatens the wellbeing of the organization or its members.” (p.536)
The environment contributes resources to the organisation only if the organisation returns desired goods and services to it.
Management has come to the conclusion of observations made that Misbehavior is a major disadvantage. This causes a disruptive working environment ending in many problems. Evidence has been researched and proven to members of organizations that purposely sabotage processes, steal company property, harass others, cheat the government, or mislead customers. Not only does the business have a major negative effect but also, employers, and the community. We have to ask ourselves, what factors and thoughts are driving these employees to act out in such a troubled manner? What kinds of personal and cultural factors influence such acts of intentional misbehavior? Definition of Organizational Misbehavior is, “any intentional action by members of organizations that violates core organizational and/or societal norms.” The apparent fact to consider in this definition is the use of Intention. Three types of organizational behavior include: (a) OMB Type S, misbehavior that intends to benefit the self; (b) OMB Type O, misbehavior that intends to benefit the organization; and (c) OMB Type D, misbehavior that intends to inflict damage. From research done, I saw that people who engage in OMB Type S are primarily motivated by self-interest consideration, whereas those that perpetrate OMB Type O do so mostly because of strong identification with and loyalty to their organization. Now that I have explained what each type is and what draws these actions, there is a need of procedures to fix. Prevention, Control, and Response to each individual situation by Managers is of great magnitude. What it all comes down to is, managers being fully alert and aware of each employee and addressing the problem as soon as it arises. They need to be careful in the approach and pay special attention to the type of organizational misbehavior to properly handle it and prevent from happening