Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths and weaknesses of organizational culture
Positive and negative effects of organizational culture
Positive and negative effects of organizational culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strengths and weaknesses of organizational culture
Organizational culture is the values, traits and behaviors of how an employee or a group reacts to situations, influenced by the organization. In the military, an Infantryman and a Medic have two different cultures. Infantryman that is not in leadership positons are taught to obey orders, “don’t think just do.” It is not until they are a team leader or squad leader that they start making basic level decision, but these decisions never supersede their bosses decisions or commanders intent. If they cannot follow direction, this could result in accidents, injuries or even death. As a medic, from the beginning of our training, we were taught to assess a situation, make multiple courses of action in an instant and make quick decisions, especially in the …show more content…
If we do not react, and make educated decisions Soldiers will die. The military created a culture of strong decision makers in medics and great doers in Infantryman. This does not mean that an Infantryman cannot lead, but their leadership skills based on their superior’s leadership style or leaders that they admired. Another example of Organizational culture is, the Army Values, which are loyalty, duty, respect, selfless service, honor, integrity, and personal courage. The Army instills these values in every Soldier, which guide our behaviors, traits and factors of how we react to situations.
Shafritz discussed four types of cultural manifestations: “Culture forms; formal practices; informal practices; and content themes,” (Shafritz, Ott, & Jang, 2011, p. 368). Culture forms include the use of jargon, the types of architecture, dress code, and rituals in an organization. An example of how a dress code affects culture forms is how military members cut their hair. You can see a distinct difference in how a Marine cuts their hair verses, how an Army Soldier cuts their hair. In the Army, Army Regulation 670-1, Wear and Appearance of the Army Uniforms and Insignia guide our dress
The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief analysis of the United States Army’s organizational structure and its culture and how these two elements impact its workers, associates and affiliates. This paper will first examine the Army’s history, development and structure to highlight the origins of the Army’s culture. Secondly, a brief history of the Army’s organizational development will be followed by a close examination of its philosophy and supporting beliefs. Lastly, this paper will discuss the role of the Army’s leadership, their response to critical issues and the organizational structure of the Army. An analysis of the army’s top leaders will help the reader to understand the Army culture more thoroughly in the context of the Army’s organizational structure. More specifically this section of the paper will examine the Army leadership’s response to the current geo-political environment and other related issues. In conclusion, this paper hopes to highlight the Army’s overall functioning from an organizational standpoint and emphasize that idea that the Army is like a functional corporation. This will be accomplished by addressing various key questions throughout this text.
Kotter lists reasons for why organizations fail to change the organizational culture. One of the reasons is neglecting to anchor changes firmly in the corporate culture. In the context of the Army as a corporation, the ideals of MC have not taken hold because subordinate leaders are not adhering to the principles of MC at the lowest levels; particularly allowing their subordinate leaders to exercise disciplined initiative and accept prudent risk. The Army has created a leadership culture driven by oversight from the highest levels of leadership to ensure that their directives are executed with little deviation. This type of leadership is very risk averse and stifles the subordinate leaders ' desire to take any initiative to implement an alternate plan of action dictated by the conditions on the
“Functionalism … holds that social phenomena persist if they contribute to social stability.” (Brym and Lie 2012:5). Military culture has a crucial role in promoting social stability and harmony. First of all, the military culture value is one of valuable social assets. In daily life, “loyalty” is not specific to loyal any certain organization. “Loyalty” is a broad concept. It can be generally understood as integrity, because the integrity means to be loyal to the promise. Thus, from this perspective, this value is helpful for improving the social integrity and the sense of social security.
The similarities between organizational culture and organizational climate within the Army are convergent since it is a virtue-based institution vis-a-vis Army Values. These values shared throughout culture and climate domains aid young Soldiers in further understanding of Army norms introduced during Basic Training while maintaining the moral compass of more experienced Soldiers performing leadership or management responsibilities. Furthermore, organizational culture and organizational climate share a purpose in developing peer-to-peer and leader-subordinate relationships so that innovative, yet disciplined, behavior leads to career progression and additional leadership opportunities. Lastly, Army leaders communicate their expectations of Army culture and climate through their actions and messages. This strategic communication effort reaches everyone in the institution or organization including families and supporting civilians.
The Army Ethic is what defines us and guides us in our duty and mission performance and all aspects of our lives. The Army ethic should be at the heart of all Soldiers both on and of duty. That is why we serve the American people. And the ethics are revealed in the Army values, creeds, and ethos. All this promotes honorable service to our nation. The Army professional sets the example and it’s what the American people expect from the soldiers that serve our nation. We must continue to serve with honor to promote trust with the people and to uphold our oath that we swore to defend the constitution of the United States. We should demonstrate character and pride with how we serve with integrity and with ethics in every day aspects.
The military culture is truly a society of warriors who heavily rely on each individual to master the ability of handling stress under the most extreme circumstances. Personal sacrifice in order to ensure mission success is paramount within the military culture. Due to this mindset, which is heavily reliant on demonstrating resilience through adversity and displaying inner strength, individuals diagnosed with a mental illness face an extraordinary battle amongst their peers.
The role of a human resource sergeant in the Army profession is well-defined by the non-commissioned officer (NCO) creed “we are professionals, non-commissioned officers, leaders” (SFC Earle, Brigham, 1973). We build a camaraderie in our profession that is unlike any other. Not all can say that they are experts, it requires years of training in that field to become a professional. In our profession, we must earn the trust of many, such as subordinates, colleagues, clients, and the nation. We are merely servants, here to serve the Soldier and their Family. Soldier’s take pride in the service that they provide.
Organizational culture is the system of shared beliefs and values that develops within an organization and guides the behavior of its members, while organizational structure is an expression of social and economic principles of hierarchy and specialization (Kinicki, 2015). Both the culture and the structure of an organization are important things for management to understand in order to successfully set and achieve an organization’s goals. Companies who excel in highly competitive fields can attribute their successful economic performance to a cohesive corporate culture that increases competitiveness and profitability. This culture is best utilized in an organization that has the necessary structure to allow its employees to coordinate their actions to achieve its goals.
I will, however, try to give the essence of it instead. The Army’s culture is “the body and soul” (TRADOC, 2010, p. 9) of the organization. It is the shared values and practices that shape all Soldiers and inspire future Soldiers to join, and for current members to perfect their craft. Better said, to move from novice to expert – a professional. While the Army culture is the body and soul, then the heart of the Army is its ethics.
The Army is an American Profession of Arms, a vocation comprised of experts certified in the ethical application of land combat power, serving under civilian authority, entrusted to defend the Constitution and the rights and interests of the American people. To be able to answer the question, “What it means to be a Profession?” one must first ask themselves, “What is the definition of Profession?” A Profession is defined as a paid occupation, especially one that involves prolonged training and a formal qualification. The key words that stick out are prolonged training and formal qualification.
In the U.S Army all soldiers are taught everyday to live by the Seven Army Values. Loyalty, Duty, Respect, Selfless Service, Honor, Integrity, Personal Courage short for “LDRSHIP”. U.S soldiers are taught to memorize and train these Seven Values. They are taught that these Seven Values must play an important role in their lives. They are also played outside the army and in their personal lives. In some cases some people do not understand or realize the importance of these 7 army values. In many ways these 7 values make us leaders, and being strong leaders representing these 7 values are what make others look up to us it also sets us to become great role models towards the young and sometimes old citizens.
The concept of organizational cultures was first raised in 1970s, and soon became a fashionable topic. Organizational culture is the shared beliefs, values and behaviours of the group. Theorists of organizations believe that organizational culture represents the pattern of behaviours, values, and beliefs of an organization. Hence, studies around organizational culture have been seen as great helpful and essential for understanding organizations and their behaviours. Additionally, organizational culture has been considered to be an important determinant of organizational success. Therefore, leaders and managers pay more than more attentions on this topic, focusing on constructing and managing organizational cultures.
Organizational culture can be defined as a system of shared beliefs and values that develops within an organization and guides the behavior of its members. It includes routine behaviors, norms, dominant values, and a feeling or climate conveyed. The purpose and function of this culture is to help foster internal integration, bring staff members from all levels of the organization much closer together, and enhance their performance.
Organizational culture can be defined as the glue that holds an organization together through a sharing of patterns of meaning. The culture focuses on the values, beliefs, and expectations that members come to share (Siehl& Martin, 1984). Organizational culture helps to contribute towards achieving the organizational goals, decision making processes, job satisfaction, employee motivation etc. It helps in uniting the employees of an organization.
The concept of organizational culture is one of the most debated topics for researchers and theorists. There is no one accepted definition of culture. People even said that it is hard to define culture and even more change it. It is considered a complex part of an organization although many have believed that culture influences employee behavior and organizational effectiveness (Kilmann, Saxton, & Serpa 1985; Marcoulides & Heck, 1993; Schein, 1985a, 1990).