Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of organizational restructuring
The impact of organizational restructuring
The impact of organizational restructuring
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of organizational restructuring
Organizational crisis can come in many different forms. It can range from a natural disaster such as a tornado, earthquake or tsunami, to a manmade disaster such as a terrorist attack, to an internal disruption such sudden downsizing and shifts in leadership. Although there are several different definitions of crisis, one of the most adequate definitions defines crisis as a situation that incorporates an element of surprise to decision makers and employees, a threat to high-priority goals, and a restriction of time available for response (Hermann, 1972 & Choi, J. N., Sung, S.Y., & Kim, M. U., 2010). Regardless of the type of crisis, the amount of disturbance, disruption, and chaos can cause rifts in the organizational culture and work environment …show more content…
As market values declined and organizations lost money, many organizations, experienced declining assets and sought a number of options to relieve the financial strain. As a result, organizations were forced to downsize and layoff individuals just to maintain existence and survival after the economic financial crisis. In 2009, employers laid off about 2.1 million workers in 11,827 private nonfarm extended mass layoff events. The numbers of layoff events and separations in 2009 registered their highest levels since annual data became available in 1996 (U. S. Department of Labor, 2010). Within an organization, layoffs are crises that are triggered by external factors. Like most crises, layoffs agitate the organizational culture and create disturbances that cause for shifts in workloads, declining employee morale, and increased insecurity and anxiety. Even in this type of crisis, organizational leaders need to be able to make sound decisions, limit chaos, and retain organizational character and …show more content…
Organizational leaders have a special responsibility to help safeguard their organizations and its stakeholders from the adverse consequences of a crisis (Santos, Mello, & Cunha, 2016). As organizations work to restore financial stability and rebuild their workforce, they are also exploring better investment opportunities that provide more protection to their assets, which are not just limited to monetary value, but also specific to retaining those employees that remain after the downsizing and layoffs. In membership driven companies that rely heavily on external partnerships, those organizations must also work diligently to rebuild those partnerships with stronger promises of protection and added security so that the members are fully confident in the services that the organization
The Oka Crisis was a land dispute in Canada between the town of Oka, Quebec and the Mohawk community of Kanesatake. In 1989, the mayor of Oka, Jean Ouellette, had announced that the remainder of pine trees near Kanesatake would be removed to add an additional nine holes onto a private, members-only golf course club and the development of sixty condominiums. Three years earlier, the Mohawk people filed a land claim for that area, but had been rejected because it failed to meet key criteria. The development plan was the start of the crisis because that land is a sacred grove and burial ground to the Mohawk people. This resulted in a protest by the Mohawks against the court decision to allow the start of the golf course construction.
Crisis is an event that is unplanned, unwanted, and dangerous and leads to hard decision making. There are many different types of crisis such as economic crisis, mental health crisis, situational crisis, social crisis, adventitious crisis and many more. Every type of crisis affects people more than we think and know. There is always someone who loses and who gains during a crisis. People who lose are usually the ones who are affected the most such as losing a job, losing a family member or someone close to them, losing their homes and sometimes even their own lives. The people who gain are usually the rich people who prey on the poor and usually gain from making money and the poor’s lives miserable.
Echterling, Presbury and McKee (2005) define crisis as a turning point in one’s life that is brief, but a crucial time in which, there is opportunity for dramatic growth and positive changes, as well as the danger of violence and devastation. They further state that whatever the outcome, people do not emerge from a crisis unchanged; if there is a negative resolution, the crisis can leave alienation, bitterness, devastated relationships and even death in its wake; on the other hand, if the crisis is resolved successfully a survivor can develop a deeper appreciation for life, a stronger sense of resolve, a mature perspective, greater feelings of competence, and richer relationships.
...g by; First, I would make sure that their is plenty of feedback for the employees. As our text suggests, "Without feedback, learning can not occur"(Crandall, W., Parnell, J. & Spillan, J. (2013). Secondly, I would make sure that I have a great crisis management team that are well trained and drilled. Thirdly, we would have a strategy and plan for crisis events. Also, It is very important to make sure that your team members are all confident in their ability to make good decisions for the company. So many times, people are afraid to make decisions. This leads to scapegoating within the departments, and the whole blame game. That doesn't get anybody anywhere.
Two important perspectives in the organizations literature have been prominent over the past several decades: organizational ecology and the new institutionalism. Ecology is often centered around the demography of organizations e.g. firm creation and mortality, while institutionalism seeks to explain organizational behavior based on the social and cultural construction of legitimacy. Ecology tends to explain the diversity of organizations we observe, institutionalism their resemblances (Lee, 2012). Despite these differences, organizational ecology and new institutionalism have much in common, as they both developed as challenges to rationalist approaches. The integration of these two traditions can be leveraged to develop valuable insights
Downsizing, restructuring, rightsizing, even a term as obscure as census readjustment has been used to describe the plague that has been affecting corporate America for years and has left many of its hardest working employees without work. In the 1980’s, twenty-five percent of middle management was eliminated in the United States (Greenberg/Baron 582). In the 1990’s, one million managers of American corporations with salaries over $40,000 also lost their jobs (Greenberg/Baron 582). In total, Fortune 500 companies have eliminated 4.4 million positions since 1979 (Greenberg/Baron 627). Although this downsizing of companies can have many reasons behind it and cannot be avoided at times, there are simple measures a company can take to make the process easier on the laid-off employees and those who survive with the company.
The Oka Crisis of 1990 can be considered a defining moment in Canadian history. During an 11-week stand off, Canada watched as Mohawk Warriors fought for the right to autonomy over sacred burial and hunting grounds. The people of Oka had agreed to allow the Provincial government to expand a 9-hole golf course to an 18-hole golf course on the Kanesatake sacred land. The situation escalated when the Aboriginal Peoples created barricades around “The Pines” to keep police and construction crews out. During one of the protests, a police officer was shot and tensions began to rise. During the 78-day stand-off, tear gas was employed by the authorities, and Mohawk Warriors were stoned. The Oka Crisis of 1990 was shortly after the Meech Lake Accord
The Oka Crisis, otherwise known as The Mohawk Standoff, is a major symbol of unresolved issues in Canadian history. The background and timeline of this crisis unfold racial tensions, police brutality, the commencement of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, and the initiation of ongoing issues of land disputes between the Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal peoples of Canada.
The Oka Crisis is a historical violent event that occurred in 1990 between the first nations and the Canadian government. It all began on July 11,1990 when the decision of the expansion of a golf course on land that the Mohawk of the Kanesatake had claimed fir years was announced by the mayor of Oka, Quebec (Robinson, 2017). This led to a 78-day standoff between the Mohawk protestors and officials of Oka, later involving the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP). The protestors had built a barricade to show their ownership of the land, but the police continued to attack with tear gas and concussion grenades (Robinson, 2017). The issue relating to the criminal code is the death of “Cpl. Marcel Lemay, who died during a bungled police raid on a
There are many definitions for what is considered to be a crisis. Alan Jay Zaremba, author of the textbook ”Organizational Communication,” combines several definitions of the word to conclude that a crisis is “an incident that occurs unexpectedly, could damage an organization’s reputation, values, and/or performance, and requires effective communication. (Zaremba, 2010) In the case of the Nuance Group, their current situation completely blindsided the organization, was a nightmare for their reputation, and communication was now the key element in restoring their image. This was indeed a crisis.
Economic growth and employee turnover is one of the most critical issue facing corporate leaders today. As a result there is a shortage of skilled workers. We have explored several aspects of the workforce stability. The employee retention issue continues in the face of unprecedented churning in the employment market. Human Resource Managers are provided with a wide range of tools to control employee turnover. Workforce stability can be a HR Manager’s competitive advantage in these turbulent times. This is one of the hottest topics for corporate leaders in all fields in the United States and globally.
Voluntary and involuntary turnover have an effect on organizations. Rapid changes in job descriptions, organizational structures, and inter-organizational competitiveness increase the importance of studying turnover and its relationship with organizational change. According to Leana and Van Buren (1999), "the loss of key network members can severely damage an organization 's social fabric and perhaps eradicate its social capital altogether." When businesses lose a high number of employees, problems can occur, costing the company time and money. Some of the costs incurred are associated with training, drug testing, physicals, and orientations to hire replacements that may take several months to learn the job and to achieve competency. There is a saying, “Good help is hard to find---and harder to keep”. This saying refers to good organizations trying to reduce turnover when the competition for retaining good employees is intense.
The communication process is not something that begins when a crisis rears its ugly head rather it is a process that takes place in preparing for a crisis before it happens. While the term crisis represents a blanket term used to describe many situations, each situation is unique, thus presenting different obstacles to overcome. However, with a well-established advanced plan in place an organization places itself in a position to overcome and work around obstacles. The development of a comprehensive crisis management plan is one achieved through effective communication where each member of the crisis management team has an advanced shared understanding of his or her role and responsibility during a time of crisis (du Pr'e, 2005).
The idea of change is the most constant factor in business today and organisational change therefore plays a crucial role in this highly dynamic environment. It is defined as a company that is going through a transformation and is in a progressive step towards improving their existing capabilities. Organisational change is important as managers need to continue to commit and deliver today but must also think of changes that lie ahead tomorrow. This is a difficult task because management systems are design, and people are rewarded for stability. These two main factors will be discussed with reasons as to why organisational change is necessary for survival, but on the other hand why it is difficult to accomplish.
Layoffs are one means by which an organization can reduce expenses with the intent of improving its bottom line. Despite being typically performed as a last resort, layoffs often have a negative impact on the remaining workforce. As a manager, there are numerous areas for concern in managing the workforce going forward. The human costs related to downsizing are “immense and far-reaching” with one of the most profound being survivor syndrome according to Hanson (2015, p. 187). Also known as survivor’s guilt, this condition relates to the emotions felt by those still employed and some of the effects include decreased motivation, moral, and job satisfaction, as well as an increased proclivity to search for other employment. This volunteer turnover being another grave concern for managers, and retention of the remaining workforce is usually dependent on their existing perception of the organization and its culture (Sitlington & Marshall, 2011). Also relayed by