Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Background of racism in canada
Existence of racism in Canada
The oka crisis essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Oka Crisis, otherwise known as The Mohawk Standoff, is a major symbol of unresolved issues in Canadian history. The background and timeline of this crisis unfold racial tensions, police brutality, the commencement of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, and the initiation of ongoing issues of land disputes between the Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal peoples of Canada.
The Oka Crisis was a land dispute between the Mohawks, a tribe of First Nations settlers, and the town of Oka, Quebec. ‘It was the first publicized violent conflict between the Aboriginals and the Canadian government. It started on July 11th, 1990 and ended on September 26th, 1990, lasting for 78 days. This crisis commenced when the town of Oka wanted an extension to
…show more content…
a golf course to be built on The Pines, which belonged to a reserve called Kanesatake.’ (2) ‘This was problematic because The Pines was a traditional, territorial, sacred burial ground, where ancestors of the Mohawks were buried.’ (1) This event was a turning point for the way Canadians viewed Indigenous peoples, and the way they viewed themselves. The town of Oka had crossed a line when the development of the golf course began without the consultation of the Mohawks. ‘The mayor of Oka was unwilling to negotiate or discuss, therefore protests broke out. Seniors, mothers, children, along with Mohawk warriors took on the streets and blocked the Mercier Bridge. This barricade caused traffic congestion and blockage of major roads.’ (1) ‘The bridge was a vital link from the suburbs into Montreal, and as a result, the Mohawks seized it to put pressure on the government.’ (2) ‘The mayor of Oka asked Quebec's provincial police force, Sûrete du Quebec, to intervene. Armed forces were sent to dismantle the blockade, who reacted by utilizing concussion grenades and tear gas canisters.’ (1) ‘The Mohawks refused to surrender and got into clashes with the police and the military. They tried to negotiate an end to the protest; however, the siege ended when the Mohawk warriors burned their weapons and moved out of the area.’ (2) ‘The barricades made of dirt came down, and the police vehicles evacuated, in return for the cancellation of the golf course expansion.’ (3) ‘The crisis was well documented, and inspired many books and films. News organizations from the USA and Europe sent correspondents to cover the developing crisis.’ (1) This long event resulted in the deaths of two individuals, one of whom was a police officer, while the other was a Mohawk senior; however, this crisis helped set the tone for Indigenous resistance. Along with the tensions between the government and the Mohawks, there were also tensions between the town of Oka and the Mohawks, as well as tensions within the Mohawk community. ‘Local racial tensions escalated as white citizens demanded an end to this “ridiculous act.” However, a large solidarity movement arose to support the Mohawks, which limited the military violence by the government.’ (2) ‘Mohawks at Kahnawàike rallied to support their kin by also blockading the Mercier Bridge.’ (3) ‘Tensions within the Mohawk community emerged when a group of Mohawks decided to negotiate with the government, while the rest felt like there was no need to negotiate because the land was theirs and no compromise would satisfy them. They felt betrayed by their own people.’ (1) This is relevant in Canada today, but to a much smaller extent. Some non-Aboriginal Canadians feel like the Aboriginal community is asking for too much, while the majority of non-Aboriginal Canadians sympathize with their living conditions and the way they are being treated. Not only did the Mohawks face racial tensions, but also police brutality.
They suffered at the hands of the provincial police. “[The police] took my cousin Angus Jacob and brought him to the back of a barn and handcuffed him to a metal chair. They pulled his pants down and they started electrocuting his testicles to get him to talk,” said Serge Simon, grand chief of Kanesatake. (3) ‘Many protesters faced criminal charges, but most were not found guilty.’ (4) ‘An investigation held after the crisis revealed problems within the provincial police’s handling of the situation, one of which being prejudice from some members of the police force in Quebec towards the Mohawks.’ (8) Aboriginal peoples in Canada continue to face discrimination, and face criminal charges for crimes they did not commit. ‘Aboriginal people make up only 4% of the Canadian population, but approximately 23.3% of the federal inmate population is Aboriginal.’ …show more content…
(5) The unfairness that occurred, in terms of everything, led to the commencement of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. ‘This commission’s goal was to establish the foundations of a fair and honourable relationship between the Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal peoples of Canada. They raised awareness among Canadians regarding land claims.’ (3) ‘They also recommended solutions to controversial issues surrounding Aboriginal peoples. However, it was, and remains to be, problematic because the government is not required to follow their recommendations.’ (4) “The main policy direction, pursued for more than 150 years, first by colonial then by Canadian governments, has been wrong.” (4) The Mohawks went through a long process to get back their land, but the problem is: they did not.
‘Not only did the construction of the golf course continue while the Mohawks filed a legal protest (which was heard and lost), but they were never handed over the land by the federal or provincial government.’ (3) ‘The Privy Council said the Mohawks could not assert title over the land because they “had not been in the area for time immemorial.” They said Mohawk presence in the region did not pre-date European presence. However, this claim is flawed due to the fact that the government described Mohawks as “descendants of the Iroquois, Algonquians, and Nipissings,” all of whom used that territory prior to and since the arrival of the Europeans. The Kanesatake people, today, under Canadian law live on federal Crown lands reserved for their use, but do not live on lands clearly having status as an Indian Act reserve. There is no clear legislative regime applicable to provide administration of these lands.’ (7) The disputed territory remains an unsettled issue. The Aboriginal minority was victorious when Aboriginal and treaty rights were affirmed in Canada’s constitution, but this did not end their struggles and they continued to face
conflicts. In conclusion, the events that happened in, and led to, this crisis were absolutely ridiculous. The Mohawks were victorious, due to the fact that the golf course was never expanded, but they faced a wide variety of unfair treatment ranging from racial tensions to police brutality to issues of land disputes. This resulted in the starting of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. ‘Polls taken suggested that 70% of respondents believed the government had broken its treaty obligations to Aboriginal people.’ (4) Canadians are told that Aboriginal people must assume more responsibility for their own affairs, but this crisis shows that we, as Canadians, are not ready to accept their actions.
The Oka Uprising was initially a peaceful protest over the expansion of a golf course on Mohawk territory that turned violent after Quebec’s provincial police, the Sûreté du Québec, responded to the protest with tear gas and flash-bang grenades, eventually escalating to a gun battle between protesters and police. Years after the stand-off, revisionist military historians have praised the Canadian military for avoiding bloodshed because of their “personal commitment [and] calm and attentive approach to native reality,” in which they ought to be commended for “carrying the burden of peace” (Conradi 548). However, Robinson rejects this notion and instead proposes a re-imagining of the Oka conflict through the “adjustment” of First Nations people who fought at Oka with the “bombing of the last Canadian reserve” (Robinson 211). Through “carrying the burden of peace” the Officers are given the power to destroy any semblance of Indigenous tradition, such as the potlatch, and to violently corral all First Nations people to sectioned off “Urban Reserves”. By disrupting popular Canadian perception of law enforcement Robinson succeeds in creating a dystopian image of corrupted power that allows readers to sympathize with the subjection of First Nations people of
The Mohawk warriors at Oka did carry the burden of peace because they were peacefully protecting their land, there was no act of violence shown by the Mohawk warriors at Oka against the army, and in the end they had peacefully walked out without putting a fight. According to Marian Scott form the Montreal Gazette, the Mohawks had used the Pines, to graze their livestock and cut wood. Since the 18th century Mohawk members and Mohawk warriors have been protesting peacefully and pressing the government to recognize their land claims, but their requests would always be
The Calder Case was the spark that led to the Canadian government recognizing Aboriginals and their rights. Firstly, the aboriginals used the Calder Case to inform the government that they were taking away their rights. The Calder Case was launched after the Attorney General of British Columbia declared “that the Aboriginal Title, other wise known as the Indian Title, of the Plaintiffs to their ancient tribal territory...has never been lawfully extinguished.”1 The statement made by the government claimed that the Aboriginal Title did not exist in the eyes of the law and before the Calder Case, it allowed them to ignore Aboriginal land rights all over the country. In addition, The Calder brought the issues the Aboriginals were facing with land claims to the attention of the Canadian government. “According to Kainai Board of Education The case made it all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada where the court ended up rejecting the native's claims after being split on it's validity. However, the Supreme Court of Canada's recognition required new respect for Aboriginal land claims.”2 The Supreme Court of Canada's recognition of the Calder Case benefited the Aboriginals as the government was...
Members of the Canadian government and the Indigenous people signed Treaty 6 in 1876. Treaty 6 was “a formal and binding contract between two nations” that would help deal with important matters. Treaty negotiations included land, education, healthcare, government funding, and more. The treaty was created to help benefit both parties – the Canadian government, and the Indigenous people. However, the Canadian government broke this treaty many times. In the mid 1880’s there w...
The Grassy Narrows (Asubpeeschoseewagong) First Nation is an Ojibwa First Nation located north of Kenora, ON. The community has been fighting against environmental injustices imposed on them from various actors over the last 40 years (Rodgers, 2009, para. 10), involving issues with mercury poisoned fish (para. 1) clear cutting of their lands (para. 27) and subsequent degradation of their land, water and food sources. This essay will detail the environmental justice struggles of the Grassy Narrows First Nation, point out the unfair treatment and environmental racism they have been subject to and will also question the role that authority, power and litigation have played within the community.
This paper supports Thomas Flanagan's argument against Native sovereignty in Canada; through an evaluation of the meanings of sovereignty it is clear that Native sovereignty can not coexist with Canadian sovereignty. Flanagan outlines two main interpretations of sovereignty. Through an analysis of these ideas it is clear that Native Sovereignty in Canada can not coexist with Canadian sovereignty.
Fleras, Augie. “Aboriginal Peoples in Canada: Repairing the Relationship.” Chapter 7 of Unequal Relations: An Introduction to Race, Ethnic and Aboriginal Dynamics in Canada. 6th ed. Toronto: Pearson, 2010. 162-210. Print.
Manitoba Métis Federation, representing Métis in Manitoba, filed a claim asking for a declaration that the federal and provincial statutes, which affected the implementation of Manitoba Act provisions, were "constitutionally invalid” (Chartrand, p. 477, 1991). In Section 31 of Manitoba Act, 1870, it provided lands to the Métis people. Section 32 assured the settlers, Aboriginal or not, that their occupied lands in 1869 would not be “jeopardized” by the wave of newcomers (Sprague, 1980, p. 416). They had 2,000 documents supporting their claim that they are the rightful owner of the land (Galloway, 2013). After more than 40 years, the Supreme Court decided in favour of Manitoba Métis Federation (MMF) in its case against the Government of Canada (Galloway, 2013)....
LaPrairie, C. (1995). Community justice or just communities? Aboriginal communities in search of justice. Canadian Journal of Criminology. 37 (4), 521-535.
In this proposal our team seeks to explore the injustices within the Indian Act. To achieve this our proposed research will examine the target population being the aboriginal woman. The paper will further explore the oppressions faced by the aboriginal women within the Indian Act. In conclusion, this proposal will sum up the negative impact that the Indian Act had on aboriginal women and how it continues to oppress this population within the Canadian National discourse.
Canada likes to paint an image of peace, justice and equality for all, when, in reality, the treatment of Aboriginal peoples in our country has been anything but. Laden with incomprehensible assimilation and destruction, the history of Canada is a shameful story of dismantlement of Indian rights, of blatant lies and mistrust, and of complete lack of interest in the well-being of First Nations peoples. Though some breakthroughs were made over the years, the overall arching story fits into Cardinal’s description exactly. “Clearly something must be done,” states Murray Sinclair (p. 184, 1994). And that ‘something’ he refers to is drastic change. It is evident, therefore, that Harold Cardinal’s statement is an accurate summarization of the Indigenous/non-Indigenous relationship in
Generations of native people in Canada have faced suffering and cultural loss as a result of European colonization of their land. Government legislation has impacted the lives of five generations of First Nations people and as a result the fifth generation (from 1980 to present) is working to recover from their crippled cultural identity (Deiter-McArthur 379-380). This current generation is living with the fallout of previous government policies and societal prejudices that linger from four generations previous. Unrepentant, Canada’s ‘Genocide’, and Saskatchewan’s Indian People – Five Generations highlight issues that negatively influence First Nations people. The fifth generation of native people struggle against tremendous adversity in regard to assimilation, integration, separation, and recovering their cultural identity with inadequate assistance from our great nation.
Despite the decreasing inequalities between men and women in both private and public spheres, aboriginal women continue to be oppressed and discriminated against in both. Aboriginal people in Canada are the indigenous group of people that were residing in Canada prior to the European colonization. The term First Nations, Indian and indigenous are used interchangeably when referring to aboriginal people. Prior to the colonization, aboriginal communities used to be matrilineal and the power between men and women were equally balanced. When the European came in contact with the aboriginal, there came a shift in gender role and power control leading towards discrimination against the women. As a consequence of the colonization, the aboriginal women are a dominant group that are constantly subordinated and ignored by the government system of Canada. Thus today, aboriginal women experiences double jeopardy as they belong to more than one disadvantaged group i.e. being women and belonging to aboriginal group. In contemporary world, there are not much of a difference between Aboriginal people and the other minority groups as they face the similar challenges such as gender discrimination, victimization, and experiences injustice towards them. Although aboriginal people are not considered as visible minorities, this population continues to struggle for their existence like any other visible minorities group. Although both aboriginal men and women are being discriminated in our society, the women tends to experience more discrimination in public and private sphere and are constantly the targeted for violence, abuse and are victimized. In addition, many of the problems and violence faced by aborigin...
Comack, E. (2012). Racialized policing: Aboriginal people's encounters with the police. Black Point, Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing.
In the article, “ Dwight” Newman (2015): Of aboriginals, Metis, First Nations, Inuit and Indians (status holding and otherwise)”, it depicts massive struggles for