Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of distributive justice
Organisational justice construction
The importance of distributive justice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of distributive justice
LITERATURE REVIEW: The term ‘organisational justice’ refers to the extent in which a company’s employees perceive the workplaces policies, procedures, interactions and outcomes to be of a fair and just nature (Baldwin, 2006). Coetzee’s (2005) institutional research displayed proof that these perceptions – positive or negative – have a major influence on employees’ overall attitude, behaviour and work ethic which, consequently, reflects on the organisations external reputation and success. Work psychologists have highlighted that the concept of organisational justice is revolved around three distinct, but overlapping components; distributive, procedural and interactional justice (Ambrose & Schminke, 2007). Distributive justice pertains to the distribution of workplace outcomes and decisions, such as promotions and pay rises. Distributive justice violations occur when these decisions are unfairly dispersed due to bias or other unjustifiable circumstances. Procedural justice deals with the process that was used in order to come to these decisions. Violations of this component could occur when the steps and reasoning in which a decision was made are deemed prejudice or unfair. Lastly, interactional justice is associated with the quality in which an employee was treated throughout the decision making process. Bies and Moag (1986) detail that truthfulness, respect, propriety and sound justification are the primary elements of interactional justice and by eliminating any one of these from employee-employer communication will result in both a communication breakdown and a breach of organisational justice. An employee’s perception of positive organisational justice is generally based on whether the procedural selection process to reach t... ... middle of paper ... ...if the applicant is not able to perform to the organisation’s standards. For example, if a promotion job description and trial period had been applied to my situation then 1. Provide a controlled, welcoming and nonresponsive means for employees to access help and talk about any potential or one-off cases of organisational injustice 2. Implement an ‘open door’ policy. This will enhance the feeling among the employees that they have the opportunity to have a voice within the company and will feel more obliged to come to management with issues. Accessibility, efficiency and impartiality should be underlined throughout all managerial decisions and new decision-making policies. 3. Develop a standard feedback system. This will be beneficial in the case of dissatisfaction from applicants that are not content with the outcome of either their performance or the outcome.
There was evidence shown that the unfair dismissal requirements were the furthermost conflicting and inconsistent from the manager’s perspective. The Fair Work Act applied unfair dismissal requirements for entirely workers, regardless of the population of workers in the business (Chapman, 2015). The Fair Work Act presents two cases that dismissal could be reasonable, including other dismissal and summary dismissal. In the first case, the law offers a sequence of stages such as concluded checklist, copies of notice, declaration of dismissal and a witness announcement with signature that managers must follow with the intention to reduce the problem (Chapman, 2015). In the second case, managers may dismiss a worker without notice due to theft or fraud. As the consequence, the amount of cases in relation to unfair dismissal has risen significantly since the Fair Work Act implemented as law. In addition to the growing records of cases in relation to unfair dismissal, the judgements from Fair Work Australia showed some contradicting clarifications of the Fair Work Act (Chapman, 2015). According to an example, a business in Albury- Wodonga had dismissed an employee due to the breach of occupational and safety laws after an employee continually denied to wear safety glasses at work (Sloan, 2011). However, after checking the worker’s reinstatement, the Fair Work Australia stated that the worker had a family and he has found it challenging to
Bennett-Alexander, Dawn D. & Hartman, Laura P. (2001). Employment Law for Business (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Primis Custom Publishing. Downloaded February 4, 2008 from the data base of http://www.eeoc.gov
One of the most striking examples of this is the substantial numbers of individuals who have been sacked (and also in consequence lost their medical care) because their employer’s lawyers were afraid that remarks that these individuals had made might lead to some other indignant and affronted employee suing the employer for allowing them to be subjected to a ‘hostile work environment’. A member of a legally privileged ‘minority’ might well then be awarded vast damages for some trivial remark. In consequence employers now even snoop on conversations and e-mails between two friendly consenting employees lest they contain a comment which might be unco...
With all discrimination aside, what’s important is to show some honest respect, ethics, value, and loyalty to every employee.
As Stadnyk, Townsend & Wilcock (2010) state, occupational justice is based upon the idea that individuals all have different needs, which are expressed through their occupations with the belief that all humans are occupational beings (Stadnyk, 2010). Through this approach, occupational justice or injustices can be seen within the contexts of geographic location, individuals and communities. Based upon moral, ethical and political ideas of justice, occupations are culturally defined and influence participation (Stadnyk, 2010). The framework of occupational justice uses structural and contextual factors to describe occupational outcomes in relation to occupational justice and injustice. Occupational injustice is defined as, “some members of society
There are a range of strategies managers could use to minimise instances of dysfunctional discrimination occurring in their workplace. These selected strategies aim to reduce the frequency of dysfunctional discrimination, rather than the severity. Some of these strategies include; a discrimination audit, enforced policies, selection procedures, and providing an effect complaint handling system.
I discovered how sticking to one’s morals should be the topmost priority for everyone involved in business, whether personal or professional. Regardless of what the consequences may be, the intensity of the problem, and the complexities it may bring, sacrificing one’s integrity should never be an option, as integrity goes hand-in-hand with the morals of an individual (Duggan & Woodhouse, 2011). They further go on to say that having individuals take part in building a code of ethics that supports employee integrity, they will act ethically. Also, I believe that companies should place more emphasis on the moral behavior of their employees, and clear-cut policies should be set regarding such ethical situations. Furthermore, I realized how serving justice while making decisions really helps in the long run, and that opting to go for the ideal rather than they deserved is not always the best option, and could hurt a company in more than one
The Fairness or Justice Approach: the decision progress should treats everyone the same unless there is a justifiable reason not to, and does not show favoritism or discrimination;
A negative work environment can make employees feel irritable, anxious and defensive. This can cause poor productivity, lack of motivation and poor communication in the workplace which in turn can cause problems for the company. An employer’s abuse of power can cause mental or emotional distress on employees and also disrupt the workplace. Examples of employers abusing their position include humiliation, undermining, disrespectful language, discriminatory comments, yelling and intimidation. When employees are surrounded by this on a daily basis it can affect their self-worth. Employers can resolve these issues by allowing open lines of communication and by not giving employees the impression that it is acceptable to act negatively and disrespect fellow employees.
Every employee wants maximise their salaries and benefits based on particular skills and the rewards available in different employment. Most employees also want to continue their employment (ACCA F9). However, when sexual discrimination was happened in a company, there...
...onship between the employer and the employee. Employers who recognize this and proactively use strategies to promote employee involvement and fair employment practices will be likely to reap the organizational rewards of doing so.
Thompson, P & Mchugh, D 2002, Work organisations: A critical introduction, 3rd edn, MacMillan Palgrave, New York, viewed 4 April 2014, http://site.ebrary.com.ezproxy.uow.edu.au/lib/uow/docDetail.action?docID=10038997&p00=organisational+behaviour.
What exactly is workplace discrimination? (Statistic) It can be defined as a less favorable treatment towards an individual or a group of individuals at work, usually based on their nationality, skin color, sex, marital status, age, sexual orientation, or other defining attributes. It can appear as a denial of certain rights, negligent treatment, deliberate harassment or work results and achievements, and so on. A person can be discriminated by their coworkers or by the employer. Thesis: Gender inequality in the workplace is an ethically historic and significant issue which requires adequate solutions because it leads to unethical discrimination of women, minorities, and those who are members of the LGBT community. As a rule, discrimination
Work plays an important role in our daily life, it is considered much more huge part of our personal life. During our daily work we make many relationships throughout our career history. Sometimes these relationships become lasting, and sometimes employment discrimination might happen. This relationships that we thought it last could be cut off by the devastation of claims of discriminatory treatment. Discrimination in the workforce has been an issue since the first people of workers in United States in the present day and as well in the past. Some employees were subjected to a harsh working conditions, verbal abuse, denial of advancement,, and many other injustices. There was also the fact that certain employees were being treated differently than other employees.
Suffield, L., & Templer A. (2012). Labour Relations, PH Series in Human Resources Management, 3rd Edition