Opportunity cost is the benefits one could have gained if another option was chosen. The opportunity cost associated with bethel’s online program would be meeting new friends. In a traditional setting, one can attend study groups with classmates to help one another. Students also miss out on the opportunity to have that human interaction with the professor. Another cost would be the opportunity to join organizations. I know some of us may not be thinking about things like fraternity or sorority or other groups, however, that is a big part of traditional school settings that many people such as myself would take advantage of. I myself played several sports in high school as well as college and if given the opportunity would do it again. …show more content…
Saving money not having to purchase books, gas to travel, and having a full-time job. “ Trading with others frees up time and resources to do other things that we do better”( ). Should Bill Gates hire a housekeeper to clean his home… Yes! The reason being is that the opportunity cost of him cleaning his own home would be the missed opportunity to work on other projects for his company. “ Trading with others frees up time and resources to do other things that we do better”( ). The Houskeeper should clean the home because she has a comparative advantage. The housekeeper is more cost-efficient than Bill Gates. If Bill Gates spent time cleaning his, let’s say ten bedroom home, he would probably take a couple of days trying to do compared to the housekeeper who does it for a leaving would take a probably a day. I should defiantly clean my house. I can clean my home better than anyone one else. I know where everything goes and it would not cost me anything to do it. Bill Gates trade-off off is different from mines because he makes millions of dollars a year. His time spent working on maintaining that salary is valuable. I, on the other hand, do have the time and resources to perform the task
Money Hurts College athletes attend post-secondary schools in order to receive an education and to participate in sports. “Student athletes participate in an organized competitive sport sponsored by the educational institution in which he or she is enrolled. Student athletes must typically balance the roles of being a full-time student and a full-time athlete” (“Student athlete” 1). Additionally, some people believe athletes should receive a salary. However, paying college athletes hurts the school, the sports, and the athletes.
A football prodigy will choose a school best fit for him regardless if he gets a bigger bid. For example, if the football prodigy had a choice to go to a school where they had a better business program because he wanted a backup plan incase he did not get drafted or there was something unfortunate to end his football career, he would choose a that school instead of a school that presented a bigger amount but did not have as a business program as the other school. In my opinion, paying those student athletes in the highest revenue earning sports will encourage them to do better in the classroom. There is an uncertain future for college athletes, very few reach the professional level and these student-athletes are sacrificing their time and bodies to reach this goal. Underclassmen are keen on making the leap to become professional athletes because the graduation rates of college athletes are not very encouraging. With no extra money for these student-athletes, they may also turn to fast (usually illegal) ways to earn money, such example may be to sell drugs. So paying student-athletes might be a way to keep these athletes eligible and safe.
Hypothetically, as athletes recognize that they can get an education, play college sports, and also get paid like an employee, they will start transitioning away from the lesser schools while creating a pool of players in the top schools. Not only would that turn out to be a horrible situation for minor schools, but this also means that college sports’ would not be exciting to watch when the top four schools fight it out, in the tournament each year. Eventually, ratings and ticket sales would go down due to the loss of unpredictability in games. College athletics are only a portion of the negatives that come out of paying student athletes, the athletes themselves are also in virtue of disorder. Not only would college athletics find itself in jeopardy, another negative of giving a college student a paycheck comes to mind.
Learning to set goals and achieve them as a student-athlete will help them become a well-rounded individual. Student-athletes should not be paid to play and the amateur status should remain as it has for generations. Student-athletes have not matured enough at this stage of life to be able to handle all of the additional responsibilities that would be forced upon them with the professional status. Put the almighty dollar aside and let student-athletes be student’s first, amateur athletes second, allowing them to grow and mature into tomorrow’s effective leaders.
A common denominator that successful people share is the involvement of playing a varsity sport in high school. Every high school in the United States is different, however all encourage students to get involved. Most commonly, students decide to join sports. High school sports can cause profitable effects because students live healthier lives, achieve higher grades and learn life lessons.
When students have to pay to play on their high school team, they not only have to do that, but also pay for any other expenses for that sport. A high school sport can cost a great deal of money without paying to play. Paying for warm-ups, gear, and other related equipment, can add up very fast along with paying to play for a sport. “Paying for equipment, facilities, uniforms, transportation, and coaches’ salaries results in a cumbersome financial burden.”(Cerling & Herman,
The pro and cons of paying a student-athletic will exist no matter what. Pros would be that the athletes will be able to support their self at school. Supporting their self could be from food, laundry, to social life around campus. Some cons would be if the student is spending the money on unnecessary things that could possibly harm them. Another con would be if the amount of money would make the student-athletic a target in the public eye. When looking at paying an 18-24-year-old student it's a lot to consider and think about.
Most schools deem it acceptable for student-athletes to miss class for nationally-televised games. Some people say that athletes get “full” scholarships that cover their education but those same "full" scholarships do not always entirely cover tuition and cost of living. Student-athletes are still expected to be upstanding in school, despite their overloaded extracurricular schedule. Paying college athletes could also solve a significant problem of athletes quitting schools and colleges. Some student athletes drop out because even though they get money from the school for books, they still need money to for food and other stuff. Most of them can't get a job because they busy with school and practice or games for the sports that they play. Most student athletes choose the school they go to because the school offers them a full scholarship which some of them think that the scholarship pays for more than just their
This mindset would cause many big-name athletes to stay in school and in turn would also help the schools. If many of the big-name athletes would stay in school, revenue for the schools would go up. People would want to go see these prime athletes, and many viewers from home would tune in on their televisions to watch these athletes. At the end of the day it would turn out to be a win-win situation as the universities would gain even more revenue, and the athletes would be paid. Now, many people would say, “the universities are paying for their education, why should they still receive money?”
It will encourage students to try their best to accomplish superior grades. It opens their eyes in a different perspective on behavior as well as stronger scholastic peer relationships. It gives students activities excluding school work, because teenagers generally focus their mind on unacceptable actions. Parents commonly show passion along with appreciation when their child/children play a sport. They get to have a closer relationship and be elaborate with them more often than normal. Frequently, students do not care about their reputation or acknowledge the adults’ opinions on themselves; but in my opinion, playing sports and being mostly involved with their schools presents an improved character while in school and once they graduate. I was once told that “Sports do not build character. They reveal it.” Additionally, self-esteem in high school is hard to come by, occasionally sports help! Sports cause you to interact with other people and uplift you to do better. It presents a sharpened perspective on your schoolwork, career, future, and life altogether. In some cases, playing a sport can benefit you in an enhanced form. Scholarships can be a broad opportunity for valuable players with a good education on their shoulders. As well as, college recruitment can be another option. Money is hard to come by for college and if that seems to be a struggle for a student playing a sport can help tremendously. That
One of the major advantages of an online degree program is the flexibility it provides to someone working a demanding job, living geographically removed from a college campus, or that simply finds it most convenient for a host of other reasons. These challenges of the modern workforce have in fact been the big driver behind the exponential rise in online degree programs over the past decade. Furthermore, the flexibility provided by an online degree program enables tailoring a program matched to personal learning style and pace.
Many would disagree with me and say that high school sports actually have more benefits than negativities for a student. For example a student in sports would be more active which would make them fitter and healthier. A student that in a team sport would make more friends which would improve their social skills and increase their
...alance my time. For example working for two hours and then spend one hour with friends. This would enable me to get my work done or meet my targets and fullfil other demands.
“The rate at which enrollments for online classes and education programs is expanding much faster in both the developed and developing worlds than at traditional universities,” claims Reed Karaim. He also states that “Online courses offer the benefits of greater convenience and also a lower total cost. (Karaim, “Expanding Higher Education”). With more online courses being offered on sites such as Udemy and Lynda as well as top universities such as Harvard and MIT, there is less incentive for students to seek education from universities
Many students say online courses are convenient. Online courses allow students to plan according to their schedule, and the time and location that best works for them. Although online education may seem more “easier,” students should look at the cons of online education. In the feature article "Face-Face or Online Instruction? Face-Face is Better," the author, Arleen R. Bejerano, claims online courses take the students away from the college community and confines them to their home. The students no longer have interaction with the college community, which may cause them to miss out on some important opportunities. This may affect their possibility of succeeding to achieve a degree. The author suggests some students may become discouraged from learning independently, from facing challenges in academics, and fall behind or