Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of the internet on our daily life
The impact of the internet on life
The impact of the internet on our daily life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of the internet on our daily life
The Internet is Forever After reading Jon Ronson’s article “How One Stupid Tweet Blew Up Justine Shacco’s Life,” published February 12, 2015, there are some critiques that can be made. First of all, a summary. The day started out as a normal day for Justine Shacco, a senior director of corporate communications. She was at the airport. She began tweeting about some people around her in the airport, saying things like “Weird German Dude: You’re in First Class. It’s 2014. Get some deodorant” and “Going to Africa. Hope I don’t get AIDS. Just kidding. I’m white!” (Ronson 1). She then turned off her phone for her 11-hour flight. When she landed, her phone was blowing up. Someone had found her tweet and it went viral. People were calling her out …show more content…
saying “I don’t know how she ever got a PR job” (Ronson 1). Everyone was ridiculing Justine for just a few tweets that were meant as jokes. Jon goes on to talk about how in the early days of twitter he was one of the people shaming. As soon as he began to realize the effect it had on people; he “began to marvel at the disconnect between the severity of the crime and the gleeful savagery of the punishment” (Ronson 1). Ronson began to wonder about the actual people that were behind these screens receiving this ridicule. Noting “sometimes, things need to reach a brutal nadir before people see sense” (Ronson 3). He scheduled interviews with Justine where she explained she just didn’t see how someone could take it as anything other than a joke. Eventually Justine got her life back on track, and realized fame wasn’t all it’s cracked up to be. Looking at the initial tweets that Justine made, it is hard for me to believe someone would post such things on the internet. While I do understand it is just a joke and meant harmlessly, I also know that people can take posts like that very literally because of how hard it is to convey tone over short pieces of text like those tweets. Personally, I will always think before posting anything on the internet especially since I don’t post often anyway. There are many instances in which people can be fired or not even hired because of posts they make due to thoughtlessness or a misinterpreted statement. Places of employment really do check those social media sites and see what kind of person you are before they hire you. It can either make or break the opportunity for you. Most people don’t realize how permanent all the posts they make are. Going along with what Ronson says about the incident “the furor over Sacco’s tweet had become not just an ideological crusade… but also a form of idle entertainment” (Ronson 1), goes to show that people find situations like this comical and just pile on because of the ability to remain anonymous among the crowd.
Ronson’s point about how there is a real person on the other side of this really gets to me. Because it really is easy to forget there is another person on the other side of it and that is what makes the internet a scary place. He even reflects on when he was one of the ridiculers, saying it felt “righteous, powerful, and effective.” Ronson soon switched sides realizing the error of his ways. He began seeking out people who were the victims of these attacks, he would interview them and get their side of the story. Most people were destroyed after being publicly shamed, some losing their jobs because of …show more content…
it. Ronson did research into public humiliation, finding records of it being used as a punishment used for crimes.
In his research he found record of a physician noting that “ignominy is universally acknowledged to be a worse punishment than death” (Ronson 3). And going along with that, I can absolutely see how that is true. You’ll always be remembered as the person who did something embarrassing or said something wrong. However, looking at the other side, it is also true that “everyone’s attention span is so short. They’ll be mad about something new [tomorrow]” (Ronson 4). It does seem like the internet finds something new every day to be mad about and finds someone new to ridicule. In later interviews with Justine, Ronson asks about how her life has been since it all happened. She responds that her life got turned upside down, and that it was hard to find work after it all. In the end, she got a job doing what she loves, in communications. Though not an easy journey because of the crowds of people who don’t forget. Justine realized that any spotlight on her was negative and that she was going to go on living her life with that in mind. Also, just the idea of the mob mentality where you can say anything, and then just blend into the crowd and everyone just piles on is a scary
thought. There is a real person on the other side of who you’re talking to online. It’s not a bad idea to also keep in mind that anything you post online can be seen by anyone and will inevitably be there forever. This could affect job opportunities, relationships, or even just day to day activity. Ronson makes some good points about how people must be considerate and less hateful of people online. For the most part I agree with him, he is very insightful and his writing style is easy to read. Overall, I liked the article and it was very relatable since social media is such a prominent part of our society and the fact that this situation could happen to anyone is so real. I can’t imagine being on the recieving end of all of that fury and ridicule.
In the article “ I Tweet, Therefore I Am” (2010), Peggy Orenstein explains that social media such as twitter can express who you are as a person and make you come to the realization of how your life is defined. Orenstein supports this explanation by giving her own personal experience on her twitter experiment. The author’s purpose is to point out that not all people who are hooked to social media have lost the disconnection of feelings along with relationships between people. Orenstein writes in a reflective tone for students and adults.
In “Unfollow,” Phelps-Roper’s experience and interaction with Twitter shows the effects of media technology on its consumers. Originally, the article identifies Phelps-Roper as a member of the Westboro Baptist Church who decided to take up Twitter after she read an article about a student who used his Twitter account to inform his friends that he was arrested while photographing riots. Phelps-Roper made a Twitter account in August of 2009 when Ted Kennedy died. This situation prompted the publication of her first tweet that celebrated Kennedy’s death stating “He defied God at every turn, teach rebellion against His laws. Ted’s in Hell!” When World AIDS Day Phelps-Roper realized her account began to reach numerous people because comedian Michael Ian Black, who had more than a million followers, had discovered her tweet on that day. Once her tweet was discovered by the comedian other people, such as “The Office”
For most everybody in the world, people tend to have two identities: one in reality and one online. Andrew Lam wrote an essay, called “I Tweet, Therefore I am: Life in the Hall of Mirrors”, in which he described how people are posting videos or statuses which is making social media take a turn. Instead of social media being a place to share very little information, people are now tending to post weird updates. Lam was describing an example where a boy that was going to surgery asked to have his picture taken because his arm got taken off by an alligator. Another example is when Bill Nye was speaking and collapsed from exhaustion. Most of the crowd took their phones out and recorded videos instead of helping Bill Nye out (540-541). With the power of the internet at everyone’s fingertips, most everyone is trying to make the most of it. With all
Whether walking down the street, at a party, or even looking through the App Store, chances are the name "Twitter ' has stood out. Twitter is a social media site that allows it 's users to post news updates in real time, socialize with other users, or even just to view the most recent events going on in the world. It can be used as a modern-day newspaper, a text-messaging service, or even a blog. In David Carr 's article, "Why Twitter Will Endure", the main topic of discussion is how long this utility would last among us. In his article, Carr clearly and eloquently expressed his views on why Twitter will endure, through the use of his own ethos and logos.
...ses a threat of humiliation and maltreating from other individuals that can have a detrimental effect on their lives. A person can go from being a normal school student to a laughing stock on a popular social network or even trend from a emotionally stable individual to a deranged, depressed critter who now hides in the shadows of society hoping never to be revealed. The informative thought of the re-occurrence of public shaming throughout history from Bennett allows the reader to question if this is an issue that is perpetual and something that will never go away. Furthermore, the author conveys the idea that publicizing oneself can be a burden; the darkside of Internet fame. Wrapping up her article, Bennett portrays a warning to the reader stating, “Shame...will always be with you”(115). Harassment from Internet fame can alter a person's life-forever.
In Stephens article, he tells how “Social media could serve as a source of live, raw information. It could summon people to the streets and coordinate their movements in real time. And it could swiftly push back against spurious media narratives with the force of a few thousand retweets”. He explains how technology can be used to push to change problems in our society and encourage us to get up and do something about it. Being able to use our capabilities if technology to fullest is “A huge reason for all this success is that, perhaps more than any other modern American protest movement, they’ve figured out how to marshal today’s tools”. In McKinnon’s explanation, she states how “To their credit, some companies such as Apple, Microsoft, Google and Facebook have joined forces with civil liberties groups in an attempt to persuade the Obama administration not to push anti-encryption measures that would enable government and law enforcement officials to access our secure communications”. This is goes with how technology can be used to make a difference just like what Stephen was saying in order to inform people on what’s going on. McKinnon explains how our social media servers have also taken a disagreement on invading our private lives. As it stands, any individual or
Immediately following this summarization, she jumps right into her accusatory tone, using the terms “soft outrage” and “hashtag activism” to explain what celebrities are doing by posting about these events on their various social media sites. Cupp coins the term early on in her article, retorting “… one only needs to look back at some recent examples of other horrifying atrocities to know that mere symbolism and solidarity -- what I call the weapons of "soft outrage" -- will not be enough to stamp out terrorism in Europe or anywhere else (par. 7). Later, she adds another made-up term into reader’s vocabulary, “hashtag activism.” She defines this by commenting “even though [#BringBackOurGirls] went viral… hashtag activism hasn 't proven very effective in the face of violent Islamic extremism” (Cupp, par.
In the essay “Where Anonymity Breeds Contempt” the author Julie Zhou demonstrates the negative impact Anonymity in the internet has had on human beings. Following with a convincing argument for unmasking these “trolls” of the internet.
The article is socially relevant in two ways. Firstly, the hashtag was on one of the most popular and widely used social media platfo...
As social media has become more relevant in my generation, I have begun to see just how hate speech has evolved over time. Recently, a video from a campaign movement was posted on our class canvas page that expressed different stand points on why hate speech should be stopped. I gained a stronger opinion on banning hate speech, especially now that people are finding ways to use fighting words anonymously and not within a political view. In this video one of the interviewee’s mentioned how people online have the mindset that they do not have to take responsibility for the crud words they say over the internet because it is anonymous and they are not saying it directly to someone’s face they cannot be punished. Things that are viewed and said over social media can come off as very offensive. I think a common thing that is misunderstood by many is that there are different forms of hate speech and using social media to hide your identity is just one of them. We need to address all forms of hate speech and not just the cases seen in public
Justine consequently later makes a choice which may not make her happier, but will make her feel better as a person, whether or not that choice was a good one is up to you. Mike White’s take on human nature and the mental drag of wanting a big change in your life is something that most viewers can relate to in some way. Watching “The Good Girl” triggers us to think what we would do in each of these situations, further pushing the burden of real life notions though us whilst
While at times some people may review the fact that public shame brings justice in the sense of “punishment,” that is assigned to the person. However public shame and its punishments never had a line drawn. Some people go too, bordering on death threats. This is the case in the article: “Is the Internet a Mob without Consequence?”, where Bolton writes: ““Within hours, people threatened to rape, shoot, kill and torture her. The mob found her Facebook and Instagram accounts and began threatening the same perils on photos she had posted of friends and family.
Not only these kids hurt others through the internet, but they bring the internet to life. What does this mean? After everyone has seen what the bullies had posted, comments, or said, they encourage it wherever they go by saying or laughing about it near the bullied kids; no one really tries to stop it. This brings physical bullying. There are...
In Sarah Nichol’s article “Cyber-Bullying and Trolling”, a view is expressed that social media does not cause bullying. According to Karyn Krawford, online anonymity has little to do with making bullies since most victims already know their attacker. In addition, often in real life, bullies and victims play the same role. As director of Cyborg Australia and expert on cyber psychology, Krawford has st...
Public opinion is often emotional rather than rational, so it is extremely easy to be incited and would possibly cause cyber bullying, which means to attack one person or a small group of persons by using offensive language. The damage caused by cyber bullying to a person is not virtual but real. An article from PR Newswire called “Cyber Hunting and Cyber Bullying” tells a st...