More handpicked essays just for you.
The existences of god
Discussion essay about the existence of god
Discussion essay about the existence of god
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In his article, "On Being an Atheist" Mccloskey gives a few contentions that look to support the non-presence of God, Atheism. This he does utilizing a few cases made by theists on a general level and in addition centering all the more on the Christian God. The cases are isolated into a few segments whereupon he lays his countering contentions. At the presentation, he gives a concise review of the contentions exhibited by theists, who he alludes to as "confirmations," guaranteeing that none of the evidences make enough avocation to accept that God does exist. Despite the fact that one of the verifications may not indicate the presence of God, all the evidences together give a solid confirmation to the presence of God acknowledging their accord or absence of disagreement. In any case, if the presence of God is focused around such demonstrates, his verifications or complaints that God does not exist are questionable, too.
On cosmological contention, the first contention he puts crosswise over is that the "negligible presence of the world constitutes no purpose behind putting stock in such a being [i.e., an essentially existing being]" (Mccloskey 51). The way that there are animals on the planet that don't know how they started to be is an implication that some being must have been there with a specific end goal to cause their presence or else, these animals might not be in presence since the trail couldn't be infinite(Evans and Manis 73). On the planet, very nearly everything event must be created by something, a tree may not fall if not slice or excessively old to stand. Along these lines, the presence of the universe must be reliant on a cause that was not brought on in light of the fact that the reasons are not boundless. As in...
... middle of paper ...
...e confirmation to his contentions. From the verifications gave by theists, it is clear they include and are incongruence with one another. On the first contention, he realizes that a maker existed by belligerence it is dislodged by development. This may not be genuine as indicated by the illustration given and also the way that everything that exists needs to have had a beginning. The reasons can't be endless, important there was a cause that was autonomous and not created by an alternate reason.
References
Craig William Lane. The Absurdity of Life without God. reasonablefaith.org, n.d. Web February 28, 2013.
Evans, C. Stephen and Manis R. Zachary. Philosophy of Religion, 2nd Ed. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2009. Print.
Keller, Timothy. The Reason for God. New York, NY: Riverhead, 2008. Print.
McCloskey, H.J. “On Being an Atheist,” Question 1: 51-54. Print.
Pecorino, Philip A. "Section 4: What is Religion?" Philosophy of Religion. 2001. 15 November 2007.
Charles S. Peirce published in the Hibbert Journal in 1908 an article titled, "A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God." The article sketches what Peirce calls, in a later comment, "a nest of three arguments for the Reality of God" (6.486). (1)
Mackie in his paper Evil and Omnipotence, constructs an argument against the idea of the possibility of a God existing that has the characteristics laid out by the main religions: Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. These characteristics include that God is omnipotent, or He is capable of stopping evil, and omni benevolent, or He wants to eliminate evil and He is entirely good. Mackie systematically goes through his logical thought process as well as his response to any type of criticism or alternative solution that might arise. The main point of his argument is to establish that God, as constructed by Christianity, Islam, and Judaism, could not possibly exist. It is one of the most highly regarded arguments towards atheism.
Richard Dawkins is one of the most celebrated atheists in today’s day and age. In Answering the New Atheism, Scott Hahn and Benjamin Wiker examine his most recognized book: The God Delusion. Is God a delusion? Or are atheists? Many have said “it takes more faith to be an atheist that a theist. “ Hahn and Wiker prove this in their description of Dawkins: “The problem with Dawkins is his against-all-odds insistence that...
Heschel, Abraham Joshua. Man Is Not Alone; a Philosophy of Religion. New York: Farrar, Straus & Young, 1951. Print.
In today’s culture, the idea of there is perfect and divine designer that made the earth and everything that entails with it, really pushes people away. Not only has this idea been conflicted about in today’s culture. It has been especially trivial in past decades, an example of this is seen by H.J. McCloskey. McCloskey wrote an article about it called “On Being an Atheist”, which attempts to defeat the notion that there is a God. McCloskey first addresses the reader of the article and says these arguments he is about to address are only “proofs”, which should not be trusted by any theist. He then goes and unpacks the two arguments that he believes can actually be addressed, the cosmological and teleological argument. McCloskey also addresses the problem of evil, free will, and why atheism is more comforting than theism.
...ature of God’s creation. The vastness of that which He’s created suggests that there will be things that humans won’t be able to logically sort out. This inability should not, however, be mistaken as proof that the A-Series or another complex entity does not exist. McTaggart’s argument lacks proof of his claim; he uses his opposition’s inability to form a definite refutation of his claim while he never really provides one himself.
Smart, Ninian. "Blackboard, Religion 100." 6 March 2014. Seven Dimensions of Religion. Electronic Document. 6 March 2014.
In conclusion, there must have been a necessary being which served as the first cause of the Universe. This necessary being can be referred to as God. I make this conclusion due to my understanding of the evidence given above and the fact that there are no reasonable arguments that beyond reasonable doubt can prove otherwise. In addition, it is my finding that the roots of the Cosmological Argument are firmly cemented in a posteriori observation (induction), as opposed to purely rational thought which is deductive. Knowing how this argument is classified is imperative because it is essential to understanding the structure of the argument and how it arrives at its conclusion.
The. 1987 Lopez, Kathryn Muller. Read Daniel: Negotiating The Classic Issues Of The Book. Review & Expositor 109.4 (2012): 521-530. ATLASerials, a Religion Collection.
Oxtoby, Willard G., and Alan F. Segal. A Concise Introduction to World Religions. Oxford, Canada: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Kohn, Risa Levitt, and Rebecca Moore. A Portable God: The Origin of Judaism and Christianity. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2007. Print.
Eastman, Roger. The Ways of Religion: An Introduction to the Major Traditions. Third Edition. Oxford University Press. N.Y. 1999
In this essay I will discuss both the strengths and weakness of the cosmological argument for the existence of God and conclude that the cosmological argument is a weak one. I will begin by outlining the simple version of the argument and its strongest criticism, which is the causal principle. I will then define contingent, necessary, dependent and independent and discuss the importance of these definitions. Following on from this, I will discuss the Kalam cosmological argument, which is an argument that attempts to avoid the criticism of the simple version by including a premise regarding the beginning of beings such as the universe. I will argue that, whilst the Kalam cosmological argument is shown to be successful to some extent, the
Barbour, Ian G. Religion in an Age of Science. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1990. Print. (BL 240.2 .B368 1990)