Oh Brother Where Art Thou Character Analysis

The Odyssey and O Brother Where Art Thou are considered a representation of each other in some ways and prove more similar than it is commonly thought. Although the overall persona of each portrayal is quite different, it still illustrates the same message. A good lesson to be learned from this comparison is to contemplate your actions to prevent bleak situations from occurring. The characters in these tales had to understand the consequences by experiencing it themselves. Acknowledging the time period that these voyages took place in, they didn't have anybody to teach them proper ways to go about situations.
Hermes, God of Thieves, could be considered a major character in Homer’s “The Odyssey”. The Coen Brothers, director and producer of the film “Oh Brother, Where Art Thou”, took the idea to take characteristics from Hermes and gave the thieving qualities to George Nelson, the cunning thief in their movie. That’s not all the Brothers borrowed though; The events involving Nelson are extremely similar but different in all the right ways. For example, “The Odyssey” states that Odysseus’ crew killed other people's

cows. On the other hand, the film makes Nelson go on a full blown shootout with the police and kills the farmers livestock in the process. Although the ending of Nelson had a humorous twist in the film, making it so that the farmers were the ones to execute him instead of the police as everyone would have predicted. In addition, the Brothers deviate from this epic by changing events in a more comical way of speech while the Odyssey remains in a more neutral context.
The 1900’s were a significantly tough time for society as a whole as during that era.

Reason being, The Great Depression took over and controlled the lives of many all across the globe. Bringing awareness of topics such as this, provides a visual realization of situations that many Americans endured throughout this journey. The film contributes the scenes to be interpreted in the Great Depression time period, without actually stating that the setting was there. Undoubtedly, the Coen Brothers did a phenomenal job incorporating the emotional and heart wrenching ambiance of The Great Depression that is somewhat overlooked. For example, the movies overall setting and the behavior of the citizens made the concept of this tragedy become realistic to the modern day eye by showing what it was actually like to be living in that situation while trying to get

by.
Despite the differences, The Cyclops is portrayed by Dan Teague, the maniacal villain in the motion picture. Furthermore, the one eyed Cyclops’ features were added to Teague’s appearance and crude personality. In both versions, the adventurous pairings infuriated Teague in unrelated separate manners. As a matter of fact, it's safe to estimate that a vast majority of society wasn't shocked that the Cyclops made their travels inconvenient. In Particular, the movies variation included aggravating Teague by ruining his KKK ritual. In the novella, Odysseus’ crew unbeknownst to the Cyclops, helped themselves to his shelter and food, which really got on his nerves. Nevertheless, the Brothers alternated these stages, considering the fact that both actions of each party concluded in a main villain becoming absolutely livid.
Therefore it has been established that ignoring potential outcomes could result in a delayed arrival at the desired effect. After having gone through many almost unbelievable things, both the epic and the movie involved sets of characters that went through many challenges but in the end they got what they originally hoped for. The groups in both tellings had good intentions, however the procedure of making this dream a reality was held up because of the previous decisions they made. In conclusion, these men faced several obstacles such as: evil villains, environment, and ultimately wanted to get home to their loved ones.