Oedipus Flaws

909 Words2 Pages

Sophocles’ Oedipus the King is a Greek tragedy and is the second of The Three Theban Plays. It follows the story of King Oedipus of Thebes as he realises that he has fulfilled a prophecy which made him unwittingly kill his own father, Laius, and marry his mother, Jacosta. ‘Hamartia’ is a personal error in the protagonist’s personality, which brings about their tragic downfall. It is often described as a tragic flaw, however it is more accurately translated as ‘an error in judgement’ or ‘mistake’. The hero who commits these so-called wrongdoings may not intentionally be doing so, which is the case when it comes to Oedipus the King. ‘Hubris’ is also something of importance when it comes to discussing Oedipus’ character. ‘Hubris’ is the excessive …show more content…

It is apparent throughout the play that Oedipus has an excessive amount of pride and a large ego, which is evident from the start of the play where in his introductory speech he declares “Here I am myself – you all know me, the world knows my fame: I am Oedipus” (Sophocles, 1984, line 7-9). The fact that Oedipus introduces himself in this way displays to the audience exactly how highly he regards himself and how much importance he deems himself to have. This conceit, including his disrespect, recklessness and even stubbornness, is the root cause of the many tribulations he encounters and subsequently results in his downfall. The attitude flaunted by Oedipus resonates throughout the play. We see it in its entirety when no one confesses to the murder of Laius and Oedipus bursts into a rage at Tiresias, shouting “You scum of the earth, you’d enrage a heart of stone…out with it once and for all!” (Sophocles, 1984, line 381-383). This boldness displayed by Oedipus allows the audience to single-handedly see precisely how he behaves and how his ego overtakes him. When it comes to his downfall, as suggested by Dodds, “the hamartia of Oedipus did not lie in losing his temper with Tiresias; it lay quite simply in the parricide and incest” (Segal, 1984, pg.180), however it is impossible to disregard Oedipus’ hubris due to it being one of the main characteristics of his personality which led him to commit these heinous acts, whether it be in …show more content…

The moment Oedipus decided to ignore the power that the Gods possessed, he placed himself in a position of failure. From a young age Oedipus had wondered about his parentage, and when told about what had been prophesised for him, he consciously attempted to evade his fortune by convincing himself he was smart enough to outwit his destiny. By trying to escape the inevitable, Oedipus had in fact ran right into the fate that was meant for him. The audience deem the Gods, especially Apollo, to be evil due to the decision made about destroying Oedipus and his family for no apparent reason. In the play, we see that Oedipus and Jacosta discuss the level of trust that should be given to the Gods, and when the prophecies come true, it sparks a justification for the audience and for the Gods, due to the topic of the Gods and prophets being under attack at that time in fifth-century BC Athens. For the audience, it is evident that he “had one of those fatal hamartiai that all tragic heroes have, as we know from Aristotle. And since he had a hamartia he could of course expect no mercy” (Segal, 1984, pg.177). The concept of ‘no mercy’ also resonates when discussing the power of the Gods. Oedipus deliberately ignoring the ability of the Gods warrants the retaliation of them with no compassion for him. Oedipus discovers his fate in the worst way, and at the end of the play the audience are

Open Document