Observations Upon Experimental Philosophy: Margaret Cavendish

496 Words1 Page

Margaret Cavendish firmly promotes her judgements of the ideology of early scientific practice formed from philosopher Francis Bacon during the seventeenth century through her text: Observations Upon Experimental Philosophy. Cavendish overrules Bacon’s scientific method and revises it with her improved scientific methods composed from her natural wit. Margaret Cavendish critiques Bacon’s scientific method by examining the origin of scientific knowledge during the seventeenth century and focuses on the misuse of scientific technology and manipulation of nature that lead to fallacies and consequences in society. Cavendish opposes scientific knowledge during the seventeenth century due to its artificial information learned …show more content…

Discovering new knowledge is essential to the scientific method because new knowledge is the key to manipulation of nature in order to benefit the good of mankind. Cavendish’s criticism beings with the misuse of scientific technology. She repeatedly asks her readers— “what advantages it to our knowledg?” (4). It is evident that scientists spend both time and labour into the use of scientific technology; Cavendish believes that a scientists time and labour is being wasted because of scientific technology. Through Cavendish’s point of view, scientific technology uselessly creates “fallacies, rather than discoveries of Truth” (4). Cavendish reveals a controversial ambiguity in Bacon’s work: manipulation of nature is aimed to benefit all common people, but, “the inspection of a Bee, through a Microscope, will bring [a gardener] no more Honey” (4). Scientific technology cannot be accurately utilized because “sense deludes more then it gives a true information” (4), which is why Cavendish revises the use of technology as counterproductive and suggests “regular reason is the best guide to all Arts” (4). The symbol of human senses supports Cavendish’s argument that aspects of natural overrule artificial. Cavendish links scientific knowledge and its fallacies through the lens of a royal female, thus changing the basic scientific information society is accustomed

Open Document